Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;159(5):1961–1967. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.002

Table 1.

Methods of Predicting In-Flight Hypoxemia

Method Pros Cons
Resting oxygen assessment
Pulse oximetry Noninvasive, inexpensive, accessible Single point value may miss significant hypoxemia with exertion
Arterial blood gas Inexpensive Uncomfortable
Exercise testing
6-Minute Walk Minimal equipment required, widely used measurement in other pulmonary disease Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia
50-Meter Walk Assesses patient during exercise, not just at rest Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia
Cardiopulmonary exercise test Provides thorough evaluation of cardiopulmonary system Time consuming, limited availability, expensive
Pulmonary function testing
Spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity Widely available, gives additional information on pulmonary disease Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia
Predictive equations
Calculation from point oxygen saturation determined by pulse oximetry or oxygen saturation Inexpensive, quick, simple to use Lack of agreement between equations, poor predictive ability
Altitude simulation
Hypoxic challenge test Good ability to predict inflight hypoxemia Time consuming, may not be readily available at all centers
Hypobaric chamber Most closely mimics inflight environment Very limited clinical availability, primarily used for research, expensive, time consuming