Table 1.
Methods of Predicting In-Flight Hypoxemia
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Resting oxygen assessment | ||
| Pulse oximetry | Noninvasive, inexpensive, accessible | Single point value may miss significant hypoxemia with exertion |
| Arterial blood gas | Inexpensive | Uncomfortable |
| Exercise testing | ||
| 6-Minute Walk | Minimal equipment required, widely used measurement in other pulmonary disease | Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia |
| 50-Meter Walk | Assesses patient during exercise, not just at rest | Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia |
| Cardiopulmonary exercise test | Provides thorough evaluation of cardiopulmonary system | Time consuming, limited availability, expensive |
| Pulmonary function testing | ||
| Spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity | Widely available, gives additional information on pulmonary disease | Poor ability to predict inflight hypoxemia |
| Predictive equations | ||
| Calculation from point oxygen saturation determined by pulse oximetry or oxygen saturation | Inexpensive, quick, simple to use | Lack of agreement between equations, poor predictive ability |
| Altitude simulation | ||
| Hypoxic challenge test | Good ability to predict inflight hypoxemia | Time consuming, may not be readily available at all centers |
| Hypobaric chamber | Most closely mimics inflight environment | Very limited clinical availability, primarily used for research, expensive, time consuming |