Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Nov 10;70:101495. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101495

T helper type (Th1/Th2) responses to SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A (H1N1) virus: From cytokines produced to immune responses

Elahe Aleebrahim-Dehkordi a,b,, Bahareh Molavi c, Melika Mokhtari d, Niloofar Deravi a,e, Mobina Fathi e, Tara Fazel f, Mehdi Mohebalizadeh a,g, Pooneh Koochaki h, Parnian Shobeiri i,j,k,l, Ali Hasanpour-Dehkordi m,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC8579696  PMID: 34774738

Abstract

Cytokines produced by T helper cells (Th cells) have essential roles in the body's defense against viruses. Type 1 T helper (Th1) cells are essential for the host defense toward intracellular pathogens while T helper type 2 (Th2) cells are considered to be critical for the helminthic parasites' elimination swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus, a disease led to an epidemic in 2009 and rapidly spread globally via human-to-human transmission. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused a global pandemic in 2020 and is a serious threat to the public health. Pulmonary immunopathology is the leading cause of death during influenza and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics and pandemics. Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 cause high levels of cytokines in the lung. Both inadequate levels and high levels of specific cytokines can have side effects. In this literature review article, we want to compare the Th1 and Th2 cells responses in SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1.

Keywords: Cytokines produced, Immune responses, T helper type, Viral infections, SARS-CoV-2, H1N1

1. Introduction

The immune environment heavily dictates the type and the magnitude of an antibody response. Particularly, the differentiation of naïve immature T cells into distinct lineages is thought to depend heavily on the local cytokine milieu and can greatly influence subsequent B-cell responses [1,2]. Cytokines signal via various STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) family protein members that induce master transcriptional regulators. Activation of genes, repression, or epigenetic modification occurs by binding several transcriptional factors to the effector cytokine gene [[2], [3], [4]]. CD4+ helper T cells are a heterogeneous population, and to date, several subsets have been characterized, including Th1, Th2, Th17, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells [5]. Tfh cells were initially described as a subset of CD4+ cells found in human tonsils. They are localized within the B-cell follicle, particularly the germinal center. They have also been reported to express high levels of several cytokines such as Interleukin-21 (IL-21) and interleukin 4 (IL-4), critical in driving B-cell proliferation, survival, and isotype class switch. Since their initial identification, the fundamental role of Tfh cells in humoral immunity has been shown in infectious disease, vaccination, autoimmune disease, cancer, and immunodeficiencies [6]. Interleukin 12 (IL-12) and IL-4 are two other cytokines that, respectively, are recognized to signal the Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation induction. Th1 cells are essential for the host defense toward intracellular pathogens, while Th2 cells are considered critical for the helminthic parasites' elimination [7,8]. Naive T cells are immature. They can be differentiated after activation into various sub-sets of T cells. In this process, cytokines have an important role. They signal via various STAT family protein members that induce master transcriptional regulators. Activation of genes, repression, or epigenetic modification occurs by binding several transcriptional factors to the effector cytokine gene [1,[9], [10], [11], [12]]. CD4 + T helper cells order the immune response and have a crucial role throughout infection, autoimmune disease, carcinogenesis, and chronic inflammatory disease. CD4 + T helper cells are classified into different subgroups, distinguished by a particular transcription regulator network and specific cytokine profiles: Th1 cells, expresses T-box expressed in T cells (T-bet) and secretes, Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and Interleukin-2 (IL-2); Th2 cells express GATA Binding Protein 3 (GATA-3) and produce IL-4, Interleukin-5 (IL-5), and Interleukin-13 (IL-13) [[13], [14], [15]]. Wuhan city (capital city of Hubei province, China) experienced a massive epidemic in “December 2019” by a new coronavirus. The coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was believed to cause this outbreak [16,17]. At the end of 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic recorded the third outbreak of an extremely pathogenic coronavirus that has threatened the human population over the last twenty years [18]. The World Health Organization (WHO), because of significant influenza cases of the strain H1N1 (2009) virus in the United States of America (USA) and Mexico, declared with a formal statement that it was a public health event with a global impact on April 25, 2009. Gradually, the scientific world went from Phase 3 to phase 6 of the pandemic vigilance, announcing the onset of the 2009 influenza pandemic. The 2009 flu epidemic, widely known as “swine influenza,” or influenza A-subtype H1N1, mentioned to an influenza A because of a new “H1N1” strain, also known as swine-origin influenza virus A [19,20]. Human influenza viruses are usually divided into two strains (H1N1 and H3N2). Both are single-stranded RNA viruses. Human influenza A type A viruses bind to sialic acid and glycolipid receptors on glycoproteins and enter the cell, inducing their pathogenicity. The virus builds antigens to protect the host immune system; this phenomenon is called antigenic shift. Due to pulmonary and extra-pulmonary involvement of the SARS virus, 2 Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was proposed as the virus's first receptor [[21], [22], [23]]. There has been a lot of discussion about the possible consequences of the coming flu season on the current COVID-19 pandemic. It has been hypothesized that IAV infection may cause more severe disease, since secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection or co-infection with two viruses causes more severe disease [24,25]. The severity of the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemic is systematically associated with increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (cytokine storm syndrome) [[26], [27], [28]]. Recently, some researchers have also suggested that immune depression, rather than profuse immune activation, is responsible for the clinical pathology of severe COVID-19 [29]. Therefore, evaluating the immune responses elicited through SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1 virus can be more helpful in figuring out unique immune mechanisms associated with morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. In this literature review article, we want to compare the Th1 T helper type 1 and Th2 cells 2 responses in to COVID-19 and H1N1. (See Fig. 1, Fig. 2.)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. In severe disease conditions, Th2 secrete cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-10, which inhibit antiviral responses and delay clearance of the virus. In mild disease conditions, the response of Th1 and the activation of macrophages, Tc, and B cells remove the reservoirs of the virus. In addition to the synergistic effect and activation of macrophages, TNF-α and IFN-γ induce antiviral responses directly through their receptors on the epithelial surfaces of the lung. DC, dendritic cell; MQ, macrophage; Tc, cytotoxic T cell; IFN, interferon; Eos, eosinophil; TCR, T cell receptor; MHC, major histocompatibility complex.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Immune responses against H1N1. T helper cell polarization has a critical role in tissue damage, pathogen removal, and the inflammatory response processing the acute lung injury infection (ALI). TNF-α and IFN-γ induce antiviral responses directly through their receptors on the epithelial surfaces of the lung, and IL-1 increases IgM antibody feedbacks. IL-4 can suppress antiviral immune responses, and IL-5 causes the continuing accumulation of eosinophils in the lungs. Besides, IL-13 can activate NKT, eosinophil, macrophage, and mast cells. All mentioned cells, excluding macrophages, are able to also secrete IL-13, which is in charge of elevating eosinophil infiltration, causing changes to the contractile apparatus of ASM, macrophage polarization, following mucus production, and elevating AHR and goblet cell metaplasia. NKT, natural killer T cell.

2. T-cells: immune response

T lymphocytes are divided into different types of cells such as Th1, Th2, Th3, Th9, T Cytotoxic, and Regulatory T cells (Tregs). Each of these cells has a specific function in the immune system that is different from other lymphocytes. Regulatory T cells are considered effective cells in the immune system that play an important role in infectious diseases [30,31]. T cell activity is associated with less disease severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that T cells play an essential role in controlling and treating primary SARS-CoV-2 infection [32]. T cells play a crucial role in harmonizing antiviral immune responses that cause the death of infected cells or mediate humoral responses. Current data emphasize that while not all patients can develop a protective humoral immune response, a sustained T-cell reaction develops.

Interestingly, data on SARS-CoV-1 infections have shown that antibodies often weaken 1–2 years after infection, while T-cell responses can last up to 17 years [33]. Peripheral T cell depletion is acutely associated with adults with COVID-19, the severity of which is positively correlated with disease severity, while asymptomatic patients and children tend to maintain peripheral T cell counts. It has been suggested that children may be protected by a diverse repertoire of naive T lymphocytes and that older adults are at greater risk due to the aging of the immune system [34,35]. In addition, existing cross-reactive T cells may accelerate virus clearance into SARS-CoV-2, but their relevance remains unclear. There is evidence that a balanced T-cell response may prevent or attenuate the course of COVID-19. In contrast, a delayed or insufficient response may lead to uncoordinated and ineffective viral control and, consequently, exacerbation of tissue damage [[36], [37], [38]]. Given a large number of Th1 lymphocytes and inflammatory monocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsies from critically ill COVID-19 patients, an excessive cellular immune response could significantly affect lung function by disrupting pulmonary function microcirculation. The cellular immune response to viral infection is mediated by interferon (IFN), in which type I IFN plays a significant role [[39], [40], [41], [42]]. Host factors, for instance, comorbidities, can negatively affect IFN production. Although antibodies are sometimes undetectable in people who have recovered from mild COVID-19, T cell responses can often be identified [37]. T cells (CD4 + and CD8 +) respond within the first two weeks of symptom onset, usually by activating Th1 [43,44]. In the acute phase of infection, they show an activated cytotoxic phenotype. In the next phase of recovery, virus-specific T cells may change to the memory phenotype of CD4 +, as well as CD8 + T cells expressing IFNγ, interleukin2 (IL2), and/or TNFα [37]. Mobile response was critically important to clean the infection in animal models, testing of SARS-CoV-1 and Merscov infections [[45], [46], [47]]. Therefore, as SARS and MERS demonstrate, T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 can occur in the absence of humoral immunity, perhaps even more frequently in some populations, may be more related to regeneration, and may serve as a more sensitive exposure biomarker [48,49].

3. T-Helper (Th) cell subset

Th lymphocytes are divided into the subgroups Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, and follicular T helper lymphocytes, each of which plays a specific role in fighting infection [50]. The Th1 / Th2 balance in COVID-19 has been linked to the final outcome of the disease. Once a viral infection has been identified, an appropriate Th1 immune response can clear it. However, if this immune response is not correctly organized, the increased response leads to a cytokine storm that triggers Th2 cells, with a poor prognosis [50,51]. According to these results, it appears that Th cell activation plays an essential role in determining the severity of COVID-19, although the exact mechanism is still not fully understood. Gil-Etayo et al. [52] recorded a significant reduction in the number of Th1 and Th17 cells in COVID-19 patients compared to the control group with a higher-than-expected number of activated Th2 cells. Deceased patients have been found to have more senescent Th2 cells than survivors. COVID-19 patients had an overly reactive Th2 response to the virus. The percentage of senescent Th2 cells was an independent risk factor for death in association with total lymphocyte counts [52]. It is suspected that this may somehow explain the development of ARDS in patients with severe COVID-19. In addition, reducing the number of peripheral Tregs in COVID-19 cases may alter the balance between the regulatory and effector parts of the immune system. This imbalance can lead to massive proliferation and activation of neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, and Th17 cells, leading to uncontrolled inflammatory responses mediated by innate immune cells. This imbalance can also contribute to tissue breakdown [53].

4. Th1/Th2 cells and strengthening the immune response in viral infections SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1

Naive T-helper cells (Th0) have the ability to react to the new pathogens that the immune system has not previously encountered, such as the case of the SARS-CoV-2, is considered a positive sense of single-stranded RNA virus, which is the reason for the ongoing epidemic disease called COVID-19. Due to the infectious factors, Th0 polarizes the immune response into Th2, which is directed against non-phagocytosable pathogens located extracellular and mainly has effects on mastocytes, B cells, basophils, and eosinophils (humoral immunity) or into Th1, which are considered as the default response cells in immunocompetent subjects to phagocytosable or intracellular pathogens such as fungi, protozoa, bacteria, and viruses. Th1 cells are mediated by T-cytotoxic (Tc) cells and macrophages (cell-mediated immunity) [[54], [55], [56]]. Recovered COVID-19 patients, and the patients with milder disease, may lose considerable normal tissue activities because of persistent fibrosis and inflammation, causing the progress of chronic lung disease [57,58]. To obtain insights into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of COVID-19, McGregor et al. (2020), have analyzed the detail of single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of the COVID-19 patients and healthy controls. Protective immunity to both Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is considered to be mediated by other cells, like IFN-γ, which produces airway memory CD4+ T helper (Th) cells [59]. The stimulation of Th1 responses is also considered a characteristic of SARS-CoV-2 in humans [38,60,61]. In addition, severe COVID-19 may be along with exacerbated and prolonged Th1 responses [62]. They have also focused on the scRNAseq datasets on CD4+ T cells and have specified the T cells within the scRNAseq of BALF. Due to the outcomes, the CD4+ T cells of BALF in the COVID-19 patients seemed to be polarized towards Th1 unlike the Th17 or Th2 lineages. Similar tests within scRNAseq of PBMC from healthy controls and the COVID-19 cases did not display any significant variations in the expression of Th17, Th2, and Th1 lineage genes, proposing that expression of Th1 is a special characteristic of Th cells in the place of pulmonary inflammation. These sites are vital because of the concentration of T cells [[59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64]]. During McGregor et al. studies, on the COVID-19 pandemic, for many clinic-laboratory reasons, including MERS-like lymphopenia, they have found that in the patients with severe stages, the immune system can induce a Th2 response against SARS-CoV-2, rather than a Th1 response, which can control the infection by Tc cells and macrophages [59]. Additionally, they have presented documents that a life-threatening exacerbation from Th2 immune response to type 3 hypersensitivity in COVID-19 vasculitis happens. Subsequently, the inflamed smooth muscle cells in the blood vessels via IL-6 lead to cytokine storms [[65], [66], [67]]. Due to Yoon et al. (2009) research, pregnancy is known as a suppression for the immune system and polarized the cytokine profile toward the responses of Th2 [68]. PBMCs samples from pregnant women who responded to innate immune inductions less than those were isolated from the no pregnant women. In spite of the fact that pregnant women are thought to be at high risk of being infected with the influenza virus, there is no comprehensive information about its underlying mechanisms [68,69]. T helper cell polarization has a vital role in tissue damage, pathogen removal, and the inflammatory response processing the acute lung injury infection (ALI). However, the polarization of Th cell in bacterial- or viral-mediated ALI is not well understood. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and H1N1, an influenza virus, were selected to induce ALI in mice, and thus the outcomes of Th-cell polarization were defined [70]. In Ryu et al. (2016) article, CIA06 (A combination of dLOS and aluminum hydroxide) decreased the production of Th2-type cytokines and induced the response of Th1 to the influenza vaccine. Indeed, chemokine and cytokine gene expression and lung histology showed that the CIA06-adjuvanted vaccine reduced hypercytokinemia and hyperneutrophilia in the lungs after the natural infection [71]. While people with the (H1N1) pandemic also have elevated levels of some inflammatory mediators, they may have sufficient regulatory mechanisms to counteract the harmful effects of hyperinflammation. This is well illustrated by the higher levels of IL1RA observed here in patients with the H1N1 pandemic compared to patients with COVID-19 [72,73]. Moreover, this study confirms that the immune reaction in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely distinct from in opposition to pandemic H1N1. This look confirmed that TNFα degrees had been decreased withinside the serum of COVID-19 sufferers compared to H1N1 pandemic sufferers [73]. At the equal time, an exacerbated polyfunctional immune reaction is dominant withinside the remedy of COVID-19 patients. This reaction is characterized with the aid of using better ranges of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in comparison to H1N1 pandemic patients. Conversely, despite the fact that people with the H1N1 pandemic additionally show off increased levels of positive inflammatory mediators, those people can also additionally have enough regulatory mechanisms to counteract the damaging results of hyper inflammation [[72], [73], [74]]. In a study by Choreño-Parra et al. (2021), the results confirmed that severely ill COVID-19 sufferers had accelerated levels of IL1β, IL1RA, IL6, IL9, and CXCL10, and decrease levels of IL2 and IL17A in comparison to healthy volunteer donors. These results are consistent with the immune profiles reported in Chinese COVID-19 patients [[72], [73], [74]]. The levels of pro-inflammatory (IFNγ, IL1β, IL6, IL9, IL12p70, CCL11) and anti-inflammatory (IL4, IL5, IL10, IL13) and VEGF cytokines were higher in critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to the H1N1 pandemic. Item [29,73,75]. In contrast, levels of IL1RA, IL2, TNFα, CCL3, and GCSF were more elevated among patients with the H1N1 pandemic. These serum cytokine profiles indicate that, further to expanded production of pro-inflammatory and Th1 cytokines, SARS-CoV-2, however not H1N1 contamination, caused Th2 responses in parallel. This may also imply that the lack of enough regulation and stability of the sort of immune reaction elicited after SARS-CoV-2 contamination may also make a contribution to the immune disorder suggested in the course of COVID-19 [73,76]. In addition, higher levels of Th2 cytokines, especially IL4 and IL5, can inhibit protective Th1 antiviral responses in COVID-19 patients. Thus, an immune imbalance of the effector response type is another important determinant of the breakdown of the host's protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2. This displaced Th2 response can generate interstitial infiltrates of Th2 cells, neutrophils, eosinophils and type 2 innate lymphoid cells, mediating pneumonia and tissue damage. In fact, critically ill COVID-19 patients typically have interstitial lung infiltrates, some of which resemble several forms of progressive interstitial lung disease, such as cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia [[77], [78], [79]].

5. The role of Th2-derived cytokines in viral infections

Classically the defensive mechanisms of the body against viral infections have been called Cellular immunity. The evolution of humoral or cellular immune reactions hangs on a repertory of cytokines manufactured by various cells, such as CD8 and CD4 T cells. Depending on the cytokine types they synthesize, these T lymphocytes are divided into two subsets called Th1 and Th2 [80]. Cytokines function as the immune response molecules with numerous physiological roles and control the immunological, reparative and inflammatory host reactions, and monocytes and lymphocytes mostly release these. T cells which are derived by cytokines are necessary for the host immune responses [81,82]. Cytokines produced by Th1 cells, especially gamma interferon, develop the production of cell-mediated immunity, Th2 cells, and cytokines secreted by them such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 seem to operate in rehabilitation from in antibody responses and parasitic infections. The sequels of the main Th2 cytokine (IL-4) on immunity to viral infections have been examined. The examination on mice with IL-4 led to a highly notable delay in virus clearance. Consequently, IL-4 can suppress both secondary and primary antiviral immune reactions [83]. In respiratory viral infections, like influenza infection, eosinophils and IL-5 are not assessed to have a crucial function in host defense. IL-5 is secreted following influenza infection and causes the continuing accumulation of eosinophils in the lungs [84]. Results of clinical researches in animals and humans have also associated the high systemic amounts of IL-6 with the provocation of clinical outcomes including viral pathogens. As such, elevated levels of IL-6 has been seen in human cases chronically infected with influenza [85], Andes [86], Hepatitis C [87], Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) [88], hepatitis B virus) HBV([89], Human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) [90], and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHF) [91]. IL- 6 over secretion can likely be a supporting tool for the stability of some viruses. Likewise, in HIV-infected patients, elevated IL-6 levels are associated with amounts of persisting viremia, but IL-6 remaining was associated with increased HIV-1 transcriptional quantities in ectocervical tissues [92]. In short, numerous proofs are reassuring a significant function of IL-6 in viral infections [93]. IL-13 also has a major role in the engaging and activating a suite of cells, like T cells, natural helper cell, natural killer T (NKT) cell, eosinophil, macrophage and mast cell. All mentioned cells, excluding macrophages, are able to also secrete IL-13, which is in charge for elevating eosinophil infiltration, causing changes to the contractile apparatus of airway smooth muscle (ASM), macrophage polarization, following mucus production and elevating hyper responsiveness of airway (AHR) and goblet cell metaplasia [94]. Studies show that IL-1α/β moderate severe inflammatory pulmonary pathology and increase survival from influenza viral infections. IL-1α/β seem to not affect destroying of cells infected with virus but to increase Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody feedbacks and attract CD4+ T cells infection site [95].

6. Th1 and Th2 cells and humoral immunity

Helper T cells are almost the primary cells in adaptive immunity because they are needed for nearly all adaptive immune reactions. They assist the activation of B cells to release antibodies and macrophages to kill absorbed microbes. Besides they assist in activating cytotoxic T cells to destroy infected target cells [[96], [97], [98]]. Th1 secreted cytokines tend to manufacture the pro-inflammatory reactions that destroy intra-cellular parasites and maintain autoimmune reactions. Interferon-gamma is the most critical Th1 secreted cytokine. Extreme pro-inflammatory responses may cause uninhibited damage to tissues; therefore, mechanism is required to prevent this. The Th2 cytokines involve IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which are connected to the increasing Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophilic reactions in atopy, and also IL-10 that often has an anti-inflammatory function. Moreover, reactions performed by Th2 can inhibit the moderate antimicrobial action of Th1. Moderate microbicide functions. The ideal situation would likely be manufacturing a properly balanced Th2 and Th1 reactions, adjusted to the immune challenges [[98], [99], [100], [101]]. Simple T cells need two signals at the minimum for being activated. The two signals are supplied by an antigen-presenting cell, usually a dendritic cell: MHC-peptide complexes sticking with T cell receptors provide signal 1, and signal 2 is supplied mainly by B7 costimulatory proteins sticking with CD28 on the surface of the T cells. When a helper T cell is at first activated on a dendritic cell, it can be transformed into Th2 or Th1 effector cells, that depends on the cytokines in their environs: Th1-cells activate B cells, macrophages, and cytotoxic T cells, and Th2-cell mostly cause the activation of B cells [97,98]. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the behavior of T cells has been observed; however, some studies have reported that the reduction of CD4 is more significant than CD8. In response to the spike protein of the virus, Th1 releases a specific class of cytokines, thereby activating the immune system. Shreds of evidence have shown that these cells usually increase in the early and acute stages of the disease and act more in moderate conditions than severe. On the other hand, little information is available about the behavior of Th2 in severe conditions and the high viral load, and it seems that these cells act properly in the mild form of the disease and low viral load [[102], [103], [104]].

7. The role of Th1-derived cytokines in viral infections

Th-1 cells release IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α/β, which promote the activation of macrophages, production of nitric oxide, and proliferation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and thus lead to microbial pathogens destruction and phagocytosis [105,106]. As a pleiotropic cytokine, IFN-γ modulates both adaptive and innate immune networks and is known as the most potent macrophage activator. Also, IFN-γ is the signature cytokine of the activated T lymphocytes. It is now known to exert various roles in modulating the immune system and defense against a broad spectrum of pathogens. IFN-γ was first discovered as a secretory factor that interfered with the replication of viruses. Moreover, it has a unique position in the antiviral defense system [107]. Antiviral activities of the TNF-α have been reported. Accordingly, its robust effects against the Influenza virus have been evidenced in the Lung Epithelial Cells [108]. IFN-γ and TNF-α may bind to their specific surface receptors on the infected cells. Thus, they trigger intracellular antiviral pathways. Also, it is believed IL-2 modulated different aspects of the immune response, including paracrine or autocrine upregulation of TNF-α and IFN-γ [109]. Both cellular and humoral responses show Th1-influenced immunity, caused by MeVvac2-SARS2-S(H) [110]. The T helper phenotypes of T cells produced by vaccines are linked to the preservation they effectuate. Less acute SARS cases were related to the advanced inductance of Th1 cellular responses [111]. Still, responses of Th2 cells were related to lung disease improvement, succeeding infection in clients vaccinated parenterally with viral SARS-CoV vaccines which were inactivated [112,113]. Therefore, tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) produced by COVID-19 must have a phenotype similar to Th1 cells [114]. Since acute COVID-19 cases have dysregulated immune responses, we assume that T-regs might have therapeutic potentialities. An adoptive way of transferring ex-vivo polyclonal expanded T-regs has been utilized lately to treat inflammatory and autoimmune illnesses [115]. A further method is to stimulate T-regs in vivo. IL-2 in low doses is employed to precisely induce T-reg development in-vivo [77,116]. Other studies have shown that patients suffering from acute COVID-19 have higher levels of IL-2 [117]. and despite having increased IL-2 levels, T-regs were decreased in acute COVID-19 cases [118]. Therapy using T-reg-originated immuno-regulatory molecules, particularly CTLA-4, may have the ability to control the inflammations in acute COVID-19 cases. Co-stimulatory T-cell signals are decreased by CTLA-4 [119]. The recombinant abatacept Fc-fused CTLA-4 protein is utilized for many years to cure systematic autoimmune illnesses [120,121] .early clinical trials mostly attended to manage ‘cytokine storm’ and particularly, the function of IL-1-beta and IL-6. findings about T-regs in COVID-19 cases were lacking at the initial periods of COVID-19 pandemic. These facts can explain the reason why abatacept has not yet been counted for managing COVID-19 cases [122].

8. Vaccination and immune response

Vaccination is one of the best ways to prevent the spread of emerging infectious diseases; the COVID-19 pandemic prompted scientists to design and produce vaccines in addition to available therapeutic methods. There are various methods for designing vaccines, resulting in the production of inactivated, live-attenuated, messenger RNA, polysaccharide or conjugate, and viral vector vaccines [123,124]. Vaccination in humans induces Ki67 + CD38 + CD4 and CD8 T cells approximately 1–2 weeks after immunization; this activated, proliferating subset comprises antigen-binding T cells. As previously reported, the Ki67 + CD38 + CD4 T cell population was induced after the first dose of vaccine in healthy controls, peaking at T2 and then returning to baseline. While neutralizing antibodies are, in all likelihood, crucial for vaccine-precipitated protection, the precise correlates of immunity are not absolutely defined, and the recent evidence additionally factors to a function for T cells [[125], [126], [127], [128], [129], [130]]. Due to the structural and functional similarity of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, the scientists used past information to design the vaccine platforms. At the time of writing, only three types of mRNA, protein subunit, and vector vaccines have been authorized and recommended for emergency use in the United States [125,131]. Vaccines are used to prevent COVID-19 activate the immune system in several ways. One of the primary mechanisms is based on virus-neutralizing antibodies. In this method, stimulation of B-cells and the production of antibodies prevent the virus from connecting to the host cell. Another way to immunize is to stimulate T cells. It counteracts the virus-infected cells by stimulating and producing CD4 and CD8 cells. HLA molecules are presented to T cells by antigen-presenting cells; this identifies the cytotoxic CD8 T cells relative to the viral peptides synthesized on the infected cell's surface [132,133]. One of the disadvantages of this scheme is the slow performance of CD4 T-helper cells in providing antigen, which can be detected by low serum IFNγ level [134,135]. published the study of the BNT162b1 vaccine, a type of lipid nanoparticle-formed nucleoside-modified mRNA in which results show acceptable levels of IFNγ, IL-2, and IL-12p70. Still, IL-4 or IL-5 is found negligible on the opposite side, indicating Th1 efficiency and the absence of Th2, which can be harmful in the safety process [134]. Animal studies have also clearly shown the COVID-19 vaccine responses to be Th1 type. Assessment of researchers on the mRNA-1273 vaccine against COVID-19 in nonhuman primates, showed that vaccination-induced Th1–biased CD4 T-cell responses and low or undetectable Th2 or CD8 T-cell responses [136]. Another study by Liang et al. (2021), described S-Trimer, a native-like trimeric subunit vaccine candidate for COVID-19 based on Trimer-Tag technology. This study also reported that immunization of S-Trimer with either CpG 1018 (TLR9 agonist) or AS03 (oil-in-water emulsion) plus alum adjuvants induced high-level of neutralizing antibodies and Th1-biased cellular immune responses in animal models [137]. In study published by Seo et al., a candidate for the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) soluble vaccine, a DNA-based vaccine, GX-19, has been tested. These researchers observed that immunization with GX-19 in mice, in a dose-dependent manner, elicited specific systemic and pulmonary antibody responses to S and T cell responses with Th1-biased orientation. Nonhuman primates vaccinated with “GX-19” seroconverted quickly and exhibited multifunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses as well as a detectable neutralizing antibody response [108]. Numerous articles have recently been presented on how SARS-CoV-2 vaccines interact with T cells. S-protein or its receptor-binding domain is the target of these vaccines. In most volunteers in clinical trials, the serum level of neutralizing antibodies (nAB) was more significant than or equal to those recovering [135,[138], [139], [140]]. T cell responses varied among volunteers for the vaccine so that when levels of CD4 and CD8 T cells were examined, differences in their levels were found in the peripheral blood. A chimpanzee adenovirus-based vaccine that targets the S protein triggers the response of S-specific T cells, which in many people lasts at least 56 days [140,141]. However, after 28 days, 90% of individuals who had received the human adenovirus-based vaccination had more restricted T cells than the virus had generated [142,143]. RBD-specific CD8 T cell responses and T4 cell responses, as well as greater memory response to CMV, EBV, and influenza in >80% of individuals after 29 days of treatment with an mRNA vaccine targeting RBD, were observed in the majority of participants, which varies with nAB titles and among individuals [138,144]. As an alternative, vaccination with the identical CD4 T cell generation technique generates a particular protein S with Th1 defect in most persons after 43 days. Still, it elicits a modest CD8 T cell response [139,145]. While vaccination safety depends largely on the production of antibodies, the vaccines produced for SARS-CoV-2 can greatly benefit the T cell response. Tfh cells are the most important regulators, germinal cells, and affinity-matured Ab maturation responses between CD4 T cells. CD4 T cells, on the other hand, have other subsets that may play an important role, thereby facilitating the optimal response of CD8 T cells. Finally, pathogen-infected cells are killed by cytotoxic CD8 T cells by releasing molecules such as granzyme and perforin. Granzyme and perforin are important proteins that can be produced by vaccination if protective Abs fails to prevent productive viral infection [[146], [147], [148]]. in addition, vaccine-induced T cell responses can sometimes be associated with protective responses [149]. Studies in patients with agammaglobulinemia, a primary immunodeficiency disorder, have shown that some other cell types (including T cells) can die if the B cell does not function properly and the antibody responds. The SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to mild to moderate disease [150,151]. as demonstrated by the production of IL4, IL5, and IL13, mice inoculated with the recombinant S2P protein recondensed in alum showed a tendency to correspond to the Th2 deviation. The mRNA-LNP vaccine generates potent production of Th1-induced cytokines (including IFN, TNF, and IL2) [[152], [153], [154]]. After ex vivo stimulation, the rhesus monkeys immunized with the BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines secreted Th1 cytokines but not Th2, suggesting that the total CD4 T lymphocytes are strongly biased towards T-helper 1 [152,155]. Tfh cells are functionally different. Different diseases or vaccination platforms can modify their functional profile. Therefore, it is interesting to observe which characteristics of Tfh cells are affected by mmRNA vaccines and how they differ. in a recently published study [156], Mice immunized with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA were tested for the quality of the Tfh cell response. Tfh cells were polarized towards Th1 or Th2 after in vitro restimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool. Vaccination with mRNALNP changed the phenotype of Tfh cells towards Th1 using the (S Furin) immunogen or the RBD immunogen. on the other hand, rRBD-AddaVax was generating Tfh cells from Th2 bias. in mice, Th2 shifted responses are associated with IgG1 production; so, it was the expected outcome [157,158]. on the other hand, polarized Th1 responses are associated with the production of IgG2 antibodies. They did not test the Tfh cell responses, but identical IgG1 to IgG2a ratios were observed when comparing mRNA1273-induced IgG responses with the S2P protein preparations in mice [153].

9. Conclusion

There are several types of functional CD4 + T cells in humans, namely Th1, Th2, and Th17, Tfh, and Treg; these cells play an important role in acquired immunity. These subsets of T Cells produce cytokines like IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, critical in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Increased cytokine expression at appropriate levels protects the host against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and effectively controls viral replication. However, their excessive production often lead to pulmonary immunopathology and adverse tissue damage. T cell activity is associated with less disease severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that T cells play an important role in controlling and treating primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. The difference in the Th1/Th2 balance in COVID-19 development has been linked to the distinct outcomes. Once a viral infection has been identified, an effective Th1-type immune response can clear it. However, if the immune response is excessive with an increased production of cytokines, this cytokine storm triggers Th2-type response with poor COVID-19 prognosis. This situation may be further aggravated by the high circulation of pandemic H1N1. In this regard, the influenza A virus may circulate concurrently with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, perhaps resulting in more severe respiratory infections in the winter. Bao et al. [159]; demonstrated the establishment of systematic models of H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection, which significantly exacerbated pneumonia in ferrets and mice, as well as suggesting concurrent vaccination against H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 may be an effective winter preventative method. Moreover, Greco et al. [160]; indicated that gender and age are important predictors of hospitalization among COVID-19 patients, however it appears that age is the most important risk factor for short-term mortality among those who had influenza vaccine. Therefore, a better understanding of the clinical and immunopathological features that distinguish the two diseases is still needed to define specific therapeutic approaches. This is an obstacle to setting targets for drug and vaccine development. The inevitable co-circulation of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses, as well as potential viral co-infection scenarios, may additionally mean a worsening of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or fal-sification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Funding sources

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions

Molavi B, Mokhtari M, Deravi N, Fathi M, Fazel T, Mohebalizadeh M, Koochaki P, Shobeiri P, prepared the initial draft; Aleebrahim-Dehkordi E, study design, supervised the project, writing-final draft and editing; Hasanpour-Dehkordi A, supervised the project, review and editing the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Kaiko G.E., Horvat J.C., Beagley K.W., Hansbro P.M. Immunological decision-making: how does the immune system decide to mount a helper T-cell response? Immunology. 2008;123(3):326–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02719.x. PMID: 17983439, PMCID: PMC2433332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Varricchi G., Harker J., Borriello F., Marone G., Durham S., Shamji M.J.A. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in normal immune responses and in allergic disorders. 2016;71(8):1086–1094. doi: 10.1111/all.12878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Villarino A.V., Kanno Y., O’Shea J.J. Mechanisms of Jak/STAT signaling in immunity and disease. J. Immunol. 2015;194(1):21–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401867. PMID: 25527793PMCID: PMC4524500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu J., Yamane H., Paul W.E. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010;28:445–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212. PMID: 20192806. PMCID: PMC3502616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cannons J.L., Lu K.T., Schwartzberg P.L. T follicular helper cell diversity and plasticity. Trends Immunol. 2013;34(5):200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.01.001. PMID: 23395212. PMCID: PMC3646926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brincks E.L., Katewa A., Kucaba T.A., Griffith T.S., Legge K.L. CD8 T cells utilize TRAIL to control influenza virus infection. J Immunol November. 2008;15(10):7428. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.7428-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kidd P. Th1/Th2 balance: the hypothesis, its limitations, and implications for health and disease. Altern. Med. Rev. 2003;8:223–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Na H., Cho M., Chung Y. Regulation of Th2 Cell Immunity by Dendritic Cells. Immune Netw. 2016;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.4110/in.2016.16.1.1. PMID: 26937227. PMCID: PMC4770095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Egwuagu C.E. STAT3 in CD4+ T helper Cell differentiation and Inflammatory Diseases. Cytokine. 2009;47(3):149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.07.003. PMID: 19648026, PMCID: PMC2733795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van den Broek T., Borghans J.A.M., van Wijk F. The full spectrum of human naive T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:363–373. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0001-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bouchery T., Kyle R., Ronchese F., Gros G.L. The differentiation of CD4+ T-helper cell subsets in the context of helminth parasite infection. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:487. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00487. PMID: 25360134, PMCID: PMC4197778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hirahara K., Nakayama T. CD4+ T-cell subsets in inflammatory diseases: beyond the T h 1/T h 2 paradigm. Int. Immunol. 2016;28(4):163–171. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxw006. PMID: 26874355, PMCID: PMC4889886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clark R.A. Resident memory T cells in human health and disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7(269):269rv1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010641. PMID: 25568072, PMCID: PMC4425129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raphael I., Joern R.R., Forsthuber T.G. Memory CD4+ T cells in immunity and autoimmune diseases. Cells. 2020;9(3):531. doi: 10.3390/cells9030531. PMID: 32106536, PMCID: PMC7140455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saravia J., Chapman N.M., Chi H. Helper T cell differentiation. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019;16:634–643. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0220-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guan W.-J., Ni Z.-Y., Hu Y., Liang W.-H., Ou C.-Q., He J.-X., et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anderson R.M., Heesterbeek H., Klinkenberg D., Hollingsworth T.D. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet. 2020;395(10228):931–934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patil A.M., Göthert J.R., Khairnar V. Emergence, Transmission, and Potential Therapeutic Targets for the COVID-19 Pandemic Associated with the SARS-CoV-2. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2020;54(4):767–790. doi: 10.33594/000000254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsoucalas G., Sgantzos M. The 2009 influenza A virus subtype H1N1 pandemic, a glance from Greece. Infez Med. 2016;24(4):259–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dotis J., Roilides E. H1N1 Influenza A infection. Hippokratia. 2009;13(3):135–138. PMID: 19918299, PMCID: PMC2765289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramos I., Fernandez-Sesma A. Cell receptors for influenza A viruses and the innate immune response. Front. Microbiol. 2012;3:117. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leung H.S.Y., Li O.T.W., Chan R.W.Y., Chan M.C.W., Nicholls J.M., Poon L.L.M. Entry of influenza A virus with a α2,6-linked sialic acid binding preference requires host fibronectin. J. Virol. 2012;86(19):10704–10713. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01166-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schweitzer K.S., Crue T., Nall J.M., Foster D., Sajuthi S., Correll K.A., et al. Influenza virus infection increases ACE2 expression and shedding in human small airway epithelial cells. Eur. Respir. J. 2021:2003988. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03988-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bai L., Zhao Y., Dong J., Liang S., Guo M., Liu X., et al. Coinfection with influenza A virus enhances SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Cell Res. 2021;31:395–403. doi: 10.1038/s41422-021-00473-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alosaimi B., Naeem A., Hamed M.E., Alka H.S., Alanazi T., Al Rehily S.S., et al. Influenza co-infection associated with severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Virol. J. 2021;18:127. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01594-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu Q. YH. Zhou, Y. ZQ. The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016;13(1):3–10. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coperchini F., Chiovato L., Croce L., Magri F., Rotondi M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tahamtan A., Teymoori-Rad M., Nakstad B., Salimi V. Anti-inflammatory microRNAs and their potential for inflammatory diseases treatment. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1377. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Remy K.E., Mazer M., Striker D.A., Ellebedy A.H., Walton A.H., Unsinger J., et al. Severe immunosuppression and not a cytokine storm characterizes COVID-19 infections. JCI Insight. 2020;5(17) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dabbagh K., Lewis D.B. Toll-like receptors and T-helper-1/T-helper-2 responses. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2003;16:199–204. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000073767.11390.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dong C., Flavell R.A. Cell fate decision: T-helper 1 and 2 subsets in immune responses. Arthritis Res Ther. 2000;2:179. doi: 10.1186/ar85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vickers N.J. Animal communication: when i’m calling you, will you answer too? 2017;27(14) doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.064. R713-R5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bert L., Tan N., Kunasegaran A.T., Tham K., Hafezi C.Y., Chia M., A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature. 2020;584:457–462. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Adamo S., Chevrier S., Cervia C., Zurbuchen Y., Raeber M.E., Yang L., et al. Lymphopenia-induced T cell proliferation is a hallmark of severe COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.08.04.236521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Maeda K., Baba Y., Nagai Y., Miyazaki K., Malykhin A., Nakamura K., et al. IL-6 blocks a discrete early step in lymphopoiesis. Blood. 2005;106(3):879–885. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0456. pmid:15831701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuri-Cervantes L., Pampena M.B., Meng W., Rosenfeld A.M., Ittner C.A., Weisman A.R., et al. Comprehensive mapping of immune perturbations associated with severe COVID-19. Sci. Immunol. 2020;15(49):eabd7114. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd7114. PMID: 32669287, PMCID: PMC7402634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sekine T., Perez-Potti A., Rivera-Ballesteros O., Strålin K., Gorin J.-B., Olsson A., et al. Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183:158–168.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grifoni A., Weiskopf D., Ramirez S.I., Mateus J., Dan J.M., Moderbacher C.R., et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020;181:1489–1501.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koch T., Mellinghoff S.C., Shamsrizi P., Addo M.M., Dahlke C. Correlates of vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(3):238. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030238. PMID: 33801831, PMCID: PMC8035658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Doglioni C., Ravaglia C., Chilosi M., Rossi G., Dubini A., Pedica F., et al. Covid-19 interstitial pneumonia: histological and immunohistochemical features on cryobiopsies. Respiration. 2021;16:1–11. doi: 10.1159/000514822. PMID: 33725700, PMCID: PMC8018216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu Z., Shi L., Wang Y., Zhang J., Huang L., Zhang C., et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Calabrese L.H., Winthrop K., Strand V., Yazdany J., Walter J.E. Type I interferon, anti-interferon antibodies, and COVID-19. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(4):e246–e247. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00034-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peng Y., Mentzer A.J., Liu G., Yao X., Yin Z., Dong D., et al. Broad and strong memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK convalescent individuals following COVID-19. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1336–1345. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0782-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou Y., Fu B., Zheng X., Wang D., Zhao C., Qi Y., et al. Pathogenic T-cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storms in severe COVID-19 patients. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020;7:998–1002. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu W.J., Lan J., Liu K., Deng Y., Yao Y., Wu S., et al. Protective T cell responses featured by concordant recognition of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus-derived CD8+ T cell epitopes and host MHC. J. Immunol. 2017;198:873–882. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhao J., Zhao J., Perlman S. T cell responses are required for protection from clinical disease and for virus clearance in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected mice. J. Virol. 2010;84:9318–9325. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01049-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu W.J., Zhao M., Liu K., Xu K., Wong G., Tan W. T-cell immunity of SARS-CoV: Implications for vaccine development against MERS-CoV. Antivir. Res. 2017;137:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gallais F., Velay A., Wendling M.J., Nazon C., Partisani M., Sibilia J., et al. Intrafamilial exposure to SARS-CoV-2 induces cellular immune response without seroconversion. Medrxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.06.21.20132449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Le Bert N., Tan A.T., Kunasegaran K., Tham C.Y.L., Hafezi M., Chia A., et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature. 2020;584:457–462. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Neidleman J., Luo X., Frouard J., Xie G., Gill G., et al. SARS-CoV- 2-Specific T cells exhibit phenotypic features of robust helper function, lack of terminal differentiation, and high proliferative potential. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1 doi: 10.1101/2020.06.08.138826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Luca R., Vincenzo N., Beatrice L., Riva G. Signals of T h 2 immune response from COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care. Ann. Hematol. 2020;99(6):1419–1420. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04066-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gil-Etayo F.J., Suàrez-Fernandez P., Cabrera-Marante O., Arroyo D., Garcinuño S., Naranjo L., et al. T-Helper cell subset response is a determining factor in COVID-19 progression. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.624483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rahimdazeh M., Naderi N. Toward an understanding of regulatory T cells in COVID-19: a systemic review. JMedVirol. 2021;93:1–15. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Saghazadeha A., Rezaei N. Immune-epidemiological parameters of the novel coronavirus - a perspective. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2020;16(5):465–470. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2020.1750954. PMID: 32237901, PMCID: PMC7157951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Welsh R.M., Selin L.K. No one is naive: the significance of heterologous T-cell immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:417–426. doi: 10.1038/nri820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Spellberg B., Edwards J.E. Type 1/Type 2 immunity in infectious diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;32(1):76–102. doi: 10.1086/317537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Carfì A., Bernabei R., Landi F. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;11(6):603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603. PMID: 32644129, PMCID: PMC7349096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Spagnolo P., Balestro E., Aliberti S., Cocconcelli E., Biondini D., Della Casa G., et al. Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19: a call to arms? Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8(8):750–752. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30222-8. PMID: 32422177, PMCID: PMC7228737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.John S. An autocrine Vitamin D-driven Th1 shutdown program can be exploited for COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.07.18.21016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Costela-Ruiz V.J., Illescas-Montes R., Puerta-Puerta J.M., Ruiz C., Melguizo-Rodríguez L. SARS-CoV-2 infection: The role of cytokines in COVID-19 disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;54:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.001. PMID: 32513566, PMCID: PMC7265853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shrotri M., van Schalkwyk M.C.I., Post N., Eddy D., Huntley C., Leeman D., et al. T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lucas C., Wong P., Klein J., Castro T.B.R., Silva J., Sundaram M., et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2020;584(2020):463–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.García L.F. Immune response, inflammation, and the clinical spectrum of COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang Y. Yu, Li B. Ru, Ning B. Tao. The Comparative Immunological Characteristics of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Infections. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:2033. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02033. PMID: 32922406, PMCID: PMC7457039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Roncati L., Ligabue G., Fabbiani L., Malagoli C., Gallo G., Lusenti B., et al. Type 3 hypersensitivity in COVID-19 vasculitis. Clin. Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Roncati L., Palmieri B. What about the original antigenic sin of the humans versus SARS-CoV-2? Med. Hypotheses. 2020;142 doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109824. 10.1016%2Fj.mehy.2020.109824 . PMID: 32408068, PMCID: PMC7204740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ravindran R., McReynolds C., Yang J., Hammock B.D., Ikram A., Ali A., et al. Immune response dynamics in COVID-19 patients to SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses. PLoS One. 2021;16(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yoon S.-W., Wong S.-S., Zhu H., Chen R., Li L., Zhang Y., et al. Dysregulated T-helper type 1 (Th1): Th2 cytokine profile and poor immune response in pregnant ferrets infected with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2018;217(3):438–442. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Doshi A.H., Kihira S., Mahmoudi K., Dayan E., Carlon T., Marinelli B., et al. Impact of COVID-19 social distancing regulations on outpatient diagnostic imaging volumes and no-show rates. 2021;76:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu J.-X., Zhang Y., An M., Wu Q.-G., Zhao Y., Li X., et al. Diversity of Th1/Th2 immunity in mice with acute lung injury induced by the H1N1 influenza virus and lipopolysaccharides. J. Inf. Secur. 2019;13(06):536–544. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ryu J.I., Park S., Wui S.R., Ko A., Han J.E., Choi J.A., et al. A de-O-acylated lipooligosaccharide-based adjuvant system promotes antibody and Th1-type immune responses to H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in mice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016:2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/3713656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dienz O., Rud J., Eaton S., Lanthier P.A., Burg E., Drew A., et al. Essential role of IL-6 in protection against H1N1 influenza virus by promoting neutrophil survival in the lung. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5:258–266. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Choreño-Parra J.A., Jiménez-Álvarez L.A., Cruz-Lagunas A., Rodríguez-Reyna T.S., Ramírez-Martínez G., Sandoval-Vega M. Clinical and Immunological Factors That Distinguish COVID-19 From Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.593595. PMID: 33995342, PMCID: PMC8115405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Conti P., Ronconi G., Caraffa A., Gallenga C.E., Ross R., Frydas I., et al. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by Coronavirus-19 (COVI-19 or SARS-CoV-2): anti-inflammatory strategies. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34(2):327–331. doi: 10.23812/CONTI-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Diao B., Wang C., Tan Y., Chen X., Liu Y., Ning L., et al. Reduction and Functional Exhaustion of T Cells in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Front. Immunol. 2020;11(827):827. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Petersen E., Koopmans M., Go U., Hamer D.H., Petrosillo N., Castelli F., et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20(9) doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30484-9. e238-e44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yang X., Yu Y., Xu J., Shu H., Liu H., Wu Y., et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8(5):475–481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cui N., Zou X., Xu L. Preliminary CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. Clin. Imaging. 2020;65:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Polak S.B., Van Gool I.C., Cohen D., von der Thusen J.H., van Paassen J. A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19: a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression. Mod. Pathol. 2020;33(11):2128–2138. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0603-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pinto R.A., Arredondo S.M., Bono M.R., Gaggero A.A., Díaz P.V. T helper 1/T helper 2 cytokine imbalance in respiratory syncytial virus infection is associated with increased endogenous plasma cortisol. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5) doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2119. e878-e86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Koziel M.J., Dudley D., Afdhal N., Grakoui A., Rice C.M., Choo Q., et al. HLA class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for hepatitis C virus. Identification of multiple epitopes and characterization of patterns of cytokine release. J. Clin. Invest. 1995;96(5):2311–2321. doi: 10.1172/JCI118287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sofian M., Aghakhani A., Farazi A.A., Banifazl M., Eslamifar A., Rashidi N., et al. Serum profile of T helper 1 and T helper 2 cytokines in hepatitis C virus infected patients. Hepat. Mon. 2012;12(12) doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.6156. 10.5812%2Fhepatmon.6156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Moran T.M., Isobe H., Fernandez-Sesma A., Schulman J.L. Interleukin-4 causes delayed virus clearance in influenza virus-infected mice. J. Virol. 1996;70(8):5230–5235. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.8.5230-5235.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gorski S.A., Hahn Y.S., Braciale T.J. Group 2 innate lymphoid cell production of IL-5 is regulated by NKT cells during influenza virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zheng J., Shi Y., Xiong L., Zhang W., Li W., Gibson P.G., et al. The expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 in respiratory viral infection in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Immunol Res. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/8539294. PMID: 28352642, PMCID: PMC5352889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lundberg L., Pinkham C., de la Fuente C., Brahms A., Shafagati N., Wagstaff K.M., et al. Selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds alter New World alphavirus capsid localization and reduce viral replication in mammalian cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Spanakis N.E., Garinis G.A., Alexopoulos E.C., Patrinos G.P., Menounos P.G., Sklavounou A., et al. Cytokine serum levels in patients with chronic HCV infection. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2002;16(1):40–46. doi: 10.1002/jcla.2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chirathaworn C., Poovorawan Y., Lertmaharit S., Wuttirattanakowit N. Cytokine levels in patients with chikungunya virus infection. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013;6(8):631–634. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60108-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Torre D., Zeroli C., Giola M., Ferrario G., Fiori G.P., Bonetta G., et al. Serum levels of interleukin-1α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor in patients with acute viral hepatitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1994;18(2):194–198. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Borges A.H., O’Connor J.L., Phillips A.N., Rönsholt F.F., Pett S., Vjecha M.J., et al. Factors associated with plasma IL-6 levels during HIV infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;212(4):585–595. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ergönül O., Şeref C., Eren S., Çelikbaş A., Baykam N., Dokuzoğuz B., et al. Cytokine response in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus infection. J. Med. Virol. 2017;89(10):1707–1713. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rollenhagen C., Asin S. Enhanced HIV-1 replication in ex vivo ectocervical tissues from post-menopausal women correlates with increased inflammatory responses. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4(6):671–681. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Velazquez-Salinas L., Verdugo-Rodriguez A., Rodriguez L.L., Borca M.V. The Role of Interleukin 6 During Viral Infections. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10(1057) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Donovan C. JE. Bourke, R. Vlahos. Targeting the IL-33/IL-13 axis for respiratory viral infections. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016;37(4):252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Schmitz N., Kurrer M., Bachmann M.F., Kopf M. Interleukin-1 is responsible for acute lung immunopathology but increases survival of respiratory influenza virus infection. J. Virol. 2005;79(10):6441–6448. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6441-6448.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Crotty S.A. brief history of T cell helps to B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15(2015):185–189. doi: 10.1038/nri3803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Arrenberg P., Halder R., Kumar V. Cross-regulation between distinct natural killer T cell subsets influences immune response to self and foreign antigens. J. Cell. Physiol. 2009;218:246–250. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Van Kaer L., Parekh V.V., Wu L. Invariant natural killer T cells: bridging innate and adaptive immunity. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;343:43–55. doi: 10.1007/s00441-010-1023-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wang W., Sung N., Gilman-Sachs A., Kwak-Kim J. T Helper (Th) Cell Profiles in Pregnancy and Recurrent Pregnancy Losses: Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/Tfh Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:2025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Berger A. Th1 and Th2 responses: what are they? Bmj. 2000;321(7258):424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Steinke J.W., Borish L. Th2 cytokines and asthma - Interleukin-4: its role in the pathogenesis of asthma, and targeting it for asthma treatment with interleukin-4 receptor antagonists. Respir. Res. 2001;2(2):66–70. doi: 10.1186/rr40. PMID: 11686867, PMCID: PMC59570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fathi F., Sami R., Mozafarpoor S., Hafezi H., Motedayyen H., Arefnezhad R., et al. Immune system changes during COVID-19 recovery play key role in determining disease severity. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2020;34 doi: 10.1177/2058738420966497. 2058738420966497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Weiskopf D., Schmitz K.S., Raadsen M.P., Grifoni A., Okba N.M.A., Endeman H., et al. Phenotype and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci Immunol. 2020;26(48):eabd2071. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd2071. PMID: 32591408, PMCID: PMC7319493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chen Z., Wherry E.J. T cell responses in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:529–536. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0402-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kisuya J., Chemtai A., Raballah E., Keter A., Ouma C. The diagnostic accuracy of Th1 (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10) cytokines response in AFB microscopy smear negative PTB- HIV co-infected patients. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):2966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39048-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Romagnani S. Type 1 T helper and type 2 T helper cells: Functions, regulation and role in protection and disease. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1992;21(2):152–158. doi: 10.1007/BF02591635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kang S., Brown H.M., Hwang S. Direct antiviral mechanisms of interferon-gamma. Immune Netw. 2018;18(5):e33. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Seo S.H., Webster R.G. Tumor necrosis factor alpha exerts powerful anti-influenza virus effects in lung epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2002;76(3):1071–1076. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.3.1071-1076.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Guidotti L.G., Chisari F.V. Cytokine-mediated control of viral infections. Virology. 2000;273(2):221–227. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Oh H.-L. Janice, Gan S. Ken-En, Bertoletti A., Tan Y.-J. Understanding the T cell immune response in SARS coronavirus infection. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2012;1(9):e23. doi: 10.1038/emi.2012.26. PMID: 26038429, PMCID: PMC3636424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Bolles M., Deming D., Long K., Agnihothram S., Whitmore A., Ferris M., et al. A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 2011;85(23):12201–12215. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06048-11. PMID: 21937658, PMCID: PMC3209347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Te C., Tseng E., Sbrana N., Iwata-Yoshikawa P.C., Newman T., Garron R.L. Atmar, et al. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One. 2012;7(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Jeyanathan M., Afkhami S., Smaill F., Miller M.S., Lichty B.D., Xing Z. Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:615–632. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bluestone J.A., Buckner J.H., Fitch M., Gitelman S.E., Gupta S., Hellerstein M.K., et al. Type 1 diabetes immunotherapy using polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;25(315):315ra189. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad4134. PMID: 26606968, PMCID: PMC4729454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hartemann A., Bensimon G., Payan C.A., Jacqueminet S., Bourron O., Nicolas N., et al. Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(4):295–305. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70113-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hu Z., Song C., Xu C., Jin G., Chen Y., Xu X., et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China. Life Sci. 2020;63:706–711. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1661-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Trotta E., Bessette P.H., Silveria S.L., Ely L.K., Jude K.M., Le D.T., et al. A human anti-IL-2 antibody that potentiates regulatory T cells by a structure-based mechanism. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1005–1014. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0070-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Poleszczuk J., Enderling H. The optimal radiation dose to induce robust systemic anti-tumor immunity. 2018;19(11):3377. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113377. (PMID: 30380596) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Bonelli M., Göschl L., Blüml S., Karonitsch T., Hirahara K., Ferner E., et al. Abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) treatment reduces T cell apoptosis and regulatory T cell suppression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2016;55(4):710–720. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Stephen-Victor E., Das M., Karnam A., Pitard B., Gautier J.-F., Bayry J. Potential of regulatory T-cell-based therapies in the management of severe COVID-19. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;56(3):2002182. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02182-2020. PMID: 32616599, PMCID: PMC7331657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Langdon K., Haleagrahara N. Regulatory T-cell dynamics with abatacept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2018;37(4):206–214. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2018.1465943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Roshanravan N., Seif F., Ostadrahimi A., Pouraghaei M., Ghaffari S. Targeting cytokine storm to manage patients with COVID-19: A Mini-Review. Arch. Med. Res. 2020;51(7):608–612. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Li T., Zhang T., Gu Y., Li S., Xia N. Current progress and challenges in the design and development of a successful COVID-19 vaccine. J. Fundam. Res. 2021;1(2):139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Clem A.S. Fundamentals of vaccine immunology. J. Global Infect. Dis. 2011;3(1):73–78. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.77299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Apostolidis S.A., Kakara M., Painter M.M., Goel R.R., Mathew D., Lenzi K., et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy. Nat. Med. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01507-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Herati R.S., Reuter M.A., Dolfi D.V., Mansfield K.D., Aung H., Badwan O.Z., et al. Circulating CXCR5+PD-1+ response predicts influenza vaccine antibody responses in young adults but not elderly adults. J. Immunol. 2014;193:3528–3537. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302503. PMID: 25172499, PMCID: PMC4170011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Miller J.D., van der Most R.G., Akondy R.S., Glidewell J.T., Albott S., Masopust D., et al. Human effector and memory CD8+ T cell responses to smallpox and yellow fever vaccines. Immunity. 2008;28:710–722. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Painter M.M., Mathew D., Goel R.R., Apostolidis S.A., Pattekar A., Kuthuru O., et al. Rapid induction of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells guides coordinated humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. BioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.04.21.440862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Samanovic M.I., Cornelius A.R., Gray-Gaillard S.L., Allen J.R., Karmacharya T., Wilson J.P., et al. Robust immune responses after one dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine dose in SARS-CoV-2 experienced individuals. MedRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.02.07.21251311. PMID: 33594383, PMCID: PMC7885942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Geers D., Shamier M., Bogers S., Hartog G., Gommers L., Nieuwkoop N.N., et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern partially escape humoral but not T-cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent donors and vaccinees.Sci. Immunol. 2021;6:eabj1750. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abj1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kaur S.P., Gupta V. COVID-19 Vaccine: A comprehensive status report. Virus Res. 2020;15(288):198114. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198114. Epub 2020 Aug 13. PMID: 32800805; PMCID: PMC7423510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Thanh T., Andreadakis Z., Kumar A., Gómez Román R., Tollefsen S., Saville M., Mayhew S. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020;19(5):305–306. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5. PMID: 32273591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Xing K., Tu X.Y., Liu M., Liang Z.W., Chen J.N., Li J.J., et al. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021;15(3):221–228. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101133. PMID: 33691913, PMCID: PMC7969187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Sahin U., Muik A., Derhovanessian E., Vogler I., Kranz L.M., Vormehr M., et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature. 2020;586:594–599. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2814-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Mulligan M.J., Lyke K.E., Kitchin N., Absalon J., Gurtman A., Lockhart S., et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020;586:589–593. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2639-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Corbett K.S., Flynn B., Foulds K.E., Francica J.R., Boyoglu-Barnum S., Werner A.P., et al. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383(16):1544–1555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Liang J.G., Su D., Song T.-Z., Zeng Y., Huang W., Wu J., et al. S-Trimer, a COVID-19 subunit vaccine candidate, induces protective immunity in nonhuman primates. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1346. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21634-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sahin U., Muik A., Derhovanessian E., Vogler I., Kranz L.M., Vormehr M., et al. Concurrent human antibody and TH1 type T-cell responses elicited by a COVID-19 RNA vaccine. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.07.17.20140533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Jackson L.A., Anderson E.J., Rouphael N.G., Roberts P.C., Makhene M., Coler R.N., et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:193–1920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Folegatti P.M., Ewer K.J., Aley P.K., Angus B., Becker S., Belij-Rammerstorfer S., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:467–478. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Mendonça S.A., Lorincz R., Boucher P., Curiel D.T. Adenoviral vector vaccine platforms in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. npj Vaccines. 2021;6:97. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00356-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhu F.C., Guan X.H., Li Y.H., Huang J.Y., Jiang T., Hou L.H., et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;396:479–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31605-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhu F.C., Li Y.H., Guan X.H., Hou L.H., Wang W.J., Li J.X., et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1845–1854. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31208-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Tse L.V., Meganck R.M., Graham R.L., Baric R.S. The current and future state of vaccines, antivirals and gene therapies against emerging coronaviruses. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:658. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Seder R., Darrah P., Roederer M. T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:247–258. doi: 10.1038/nri2274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Vinuesa C.G., Linterman M.A., Yu D., MacLennan I.C.M. Follicular Helper T Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:335–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055605. (PMID: 26907215) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sallusto F., Lanzavecchia A., Araki K., Ahmed R. From vaccines to memory and back. Immunity. 2010;33:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Crotty S. T follicular helper cell biology: a decade of discovery and diseases. immunity. 2019;50:1132–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Plotkin S.A. Correlates of Protection Induced by Vaccination. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:1055–1065. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00131-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Quinti I., Lougaris V., Milito C., Cinetto F., Pecoraro A., Mezzaroma I., et al. A possible role for B cells in COVID-19? lesson from patients with agammaglobulinemia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020;146:211–213.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.013. PMID: 32333914, PMCID: PMC7175894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Soresina A., Moratto D., Chiarini M., Paolillo C., Baresi G., Focà E., et al. Two X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Patients Develop Pneumonia as COVID-19 Manifestation but Recover. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2020;31:565–569. doi: 10.1111/pai.13263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Vogel A.B., Kanevsky I., Che Y., Swanson K.A., Muik A., Vormehr M., et al. A Prefusion SARS-CoV-2 Spike RNA vaccine is highly immunogenic and prevents lung infection in non-human primates. Biorxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.09.08.280818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Bettini E., Locci M. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines: Immunological Mechanism and Beyond. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(2):147. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020147. PMID: 33673048, PMCID: PMC7918810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Laczkó D., Hogan M.J., Toulmin S.A., Hicks P., Lederer K., Gaudette B.T., et al. A single immunization with nucleoside-modified mrna vaccines elicits strong cellular and humoral Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. Immunity. 2020;53:724–732.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Corbett K.S., Flynn B., Foulds K.E., Francica J.R., Boyoglu-Barnum S., Werner A.P., et al. Evaluation of the MRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1544–1555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lederer K., Castaño D., Atria D.G., Oguin T.H., Wang S., Manzoni T.B., et al. SARS-CoV-2 MRNA vaccines foster potent antigen-specific germinal center responses associated with neutralizing antibody generation. Immunity. 2020;53:1281–1295.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Reinhardt R.L., Liang H.-E., Locksley R.M. Cytokine-Secreting Follicular T Cells Shape the Antibody Repertoire. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:385–393. doi: 10.1038/ni.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Stevens T.L., Bossie A., Sanders V.M., Fernandez-Botran R., Coffman R.L., Mosmann T.R., et al. Regulation of antibody isotype secretion by subsets of antigen-specific Helper T Cells. Nature. 1988;334:255–258. doi: 10.1038/334255a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Bao L., Deng W., Qi F., Lv Q., Song Z., Liu J., et al. Sequential infection with H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 aggravated COVID-19 pathogenesis in a mammalian model, and co-vaccination as an effective method of prevention of COVID-19 and influenza. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021;6(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00618-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Greco S., Bella A., Bonsi B., Fabbri N., Califano A., Morrone S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and H1N1 vaccination: does a relationship between the two factors really exist? A retrospective analysis of a territorial cohort in Ferrara. Italy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25(6):2795–2801. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transplant Immunology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES