Table 2.
Dance injury prevalence in two different periods (%).
| Genres | Backgrounds | Before lockdown | During lockdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dancology (n = 1,183) | AMS | 27.8% | 43.3%† (Be > Du)† | 41.7%† | 14.9% |
| USAMS | 45% | 15.6% | |||
| USHS | 43.5% | 13.6% | |||
| Ballet (n = 123) | AMS | 16.5% | 25.2% | 22.7% | 20.3% |
| USAMS | 60%† | 12% | |||
| Contemporary dance (n = 81) | AMS | 80% | 43.2% (Be > Du)† | 20% | 13.5% |
| USAMS | 47.8% | 8.7% | |||
| USHS | 37.7% | 15.1% | |||
| Chinese dance (n = 451) | AMS | 27.0% | 36.1% (Be > Du)† | 36.5%† | 23.5%† |
| USAMS | 40.6% | 24.2%† | |||
| USHS | 39.8%* | 13.4% | |||
| DanceSport (n = 214) | AMS | 41.7% | 33.6% (Be > Du)† | 8.3% | 7.9% |
| USAMS | 35.9% | 5.7% | |||
| USHS | 32.2% | 8.7% | |||
| Others (n = 34) | AMS | 38.5% | 38.2% | 23.1% | 26.5% |
| USAMS | 37.5% | 37.5% | |||
| Total (n = 2,086) | AMS | 26.2% | 39.6%† | 30.4%† | 16.5% |
| USAMS | 43.5%† | 16.4% | |||
| USHS | 41.5%† | 13.3% | |||
“Chinese Dance” included Chinese Classic Dance and Chinese Folk Dance;
*
p < 0.05;
†
p < 0.01.
AMS: Affiliation middle school students; USAMS: University but previous trained at affiliate school; USHS: University but previous trained at high school; Be: Before lockdown; Du: During lockdown.