Table 1.
Summary of the selected studies showing the type of cameras and the study characteristics
| Authors (year) | Country | Type of study | Study setting | Sample Size | Type of camera | AI software | Classifications* | Study quality** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natarajan et al., (2019) | India | Cross-sectional | Dispensaries, primary care | 213 | Remidio NM FOP 10 | Medios technologies, Singapore | 5 | 17 |
| Rajalakshmi et al., (2018) | India | Cross-sectional | Outpatient, tertiary center | 296 | Remidio NM FOP 10 | EyeArtTM | 5 | 18 |
| Sosale Aravind et al., (2020) | India | Cross-sectional | Outpatient, tertiary care | 900 | Remidio NM FOP 10 | Medios technologies, Singapore | 5 | 18 |
| Sosale, Murthy et al., (2020) | India | Cross-sectional | Outpatient, tertiary center | 297 | Remidio NM FOP 10 | Medios technologies, Singapore | 5 | 18 |
*Number of classifications of images defined such as none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative, **Study quality method assessed by QUADAS tool. NM FOP: Nonmydriatic fundus on phone, AI: Artificial intelligence