Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2021 Nov 10;87(23):e01524-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01524-21

In-Depth Investigation of the Safety of Wooden Shelves Used for Traditional Cheese Ripening

Luca Settanni a, Gabriele Busetta a, Valeria Puccio a, Giuseppe Licitra b, Elena Franciosi c, Luigi Botta d, Rosalia Di Gerlando a, Massimo Todaro a, Raimondo Gaglio a,
Editor: Johanna Björkrothe
PMCID: PMC8579974  PMID: 34550766

ABSTRACT

The main goal of this research was to characterize the bacterial diversity of the wooden boards used for aging traditional Sicilian cheeses and to evaluate whether pathogenic bacteria are associated with these surfaces. Eighteen cheese dairy factories producing three traditional cheese typologies (PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano) were selected within the region of Sicily. The wooden shelf surfaces were sampled by a destructive method to detach wood splinters as well as by a nondestructive brushing to collect microbial cells. Scanning electron microscopy showed the presence of almost continuous bacterial formations on the majority of the shelves analyzed. Yeasts and fungal hyphae were also visualized, indicating the complexity of the plank communities. The amplicon library of the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region was paired-end sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq system, allowing the identification of 14 phyla, 32 classes, 52 orders, 93 families, and 137 genera. Staphylococcus equorum was identified from all wooden surfaces, with a maximum abundance of 64.75%. Among cheese-surface-ripening bacteria, Brevibacterium and Corynebacterium were detected in almost all samples. Several halophilic (Halomonas, Tetragenococcus halophilus, Chromohalobacter, Salimicrobium, Marinococcus, Salegentibacter, Haererehalobacter, Marinobacter, and Idiomarinaceae) and moderately halophilic (Salinicoccus, Psychrobacter, and Salinisphaera) bacteria were frequently identified. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were present at low percentages in the genera Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Streptococcus. The levels of viable microorganisms on the wooden shelves ranged between 2.4 and 7.8 log CFU/cm2. In some cases, LAB were counted at very high levels (8.2 log CFU/cm2). Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family were detected in a viable state for only six samples. Coagulase-positive staphylococci, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes were not detected. Seventy-five strains belonged to the genera Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Weissella.

IMPORTANCE This study provides evidence for the lack of pathogenic bacteria on the wooden shelves used to ripen internal bacterially ripened semihard and hard cheeses produced in Sicily. These three cheeses are not inoculated on their surfaces, and surface ripening is not considered to occur or, at least, does not occur at the same extent as surface-inoculated smear cheeses. Several bacterial groups identified from the wooden shelves are typically associated with smear cheeses, strongly suggesting that PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheese rind contributes to their final organoleptic profiles.

KEYWORDS: cheese ripening, lactic acid bacteria, MiSeq Illumina, scanning electron microscopy, traditional cheeses, wooden shelves

INTRODUCTION

Several traditional Italian cheeses are ripened on wooden shelves. In Sicily, the entire cheese production process is performed with wooden equipment for all typical products (13), and the contact with wood begins when milk is collected in the wooden vats used for curdling (46). Up to date, there has been no specific contraindication to the use of wood as a food contact material, because European Regulation (EC) no. 1935/2004 regarding the materials in contact with foods does not refer to wood (7). To this purpose, member countries legislate at different levels (8), and the basic principle is that any material used for preparation, packaging, and wrapping of foods must not transfer its constituents to foods (9). For this reason, dairy production in Italy can be carried out with wooden equipment under EC no. 2074/2005, which allows derogation from EC no. 852/2004 for foods with traditional characteristics (9).

In order to demonstrate the suitability of wood for dairy purposes, different French and Italian research groups focused on the microbial characterization of wooden vats, showing how lactic acid bacteria (LAB), responsible for curd acidification (starter LAB) and cheese ripening (non-starter LAB), form stable biofilms (4, 1013). The same authors also evaluated the presence of Escherichia coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci as process hygiene criteria and Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes as food safety criteria in light of the Commission Regulation (EC) no. 2073/2005 (14), finding that while coliforms were counted at very low densities, the other pathogenic bacteria were never detected. The absence of the undesired bacteria in the wooden vats was better investigated by Cruciata et al. (15), who contaminated raw milk with the four main dairy pathogens and, after cheese making, showed that the neoformed LAB biofilms on the wood surfaces prevented their attachment to the vats. The research on the safety aspects of the wooden shelves is more limited; to our knowledge, only Mariani et al. (16) have performed microbial characterization of wooden shelves used for the ripening of French Reblochon de Savoie smear cheeses. By a culture-dependent approach, the authors found that micrococci and corynebacteria, yeasts, and molds constituted the dominant microflora on the shelves, while leuconostocs, lactobacilli, enterococci, staphylococci, and pseudomonads were found at low levels. However, smear cheeses are generally inoculated by commercially available surface starters (17), and this might explain the dominance of micrococci and corynebacteria and yeasts found on the shelves by Mariani et al. (16). The same research group evaluated also the inhibition of L. monocytogenes growth by the wooden shelf biofilms, indicating a certain potential of wood for cheese bioprotection against food pathogens (18).

In the last 15 years, the application of culture-independent techniques to study the microbial communities of complex matrices, including cheeses, increased consistently (19, 20). Several reasons explain the success of culture-independent approaches. First, culture-based techniques unavoidably underestimate the microbial diversity of a given matrix since the subdominant species present can be outcompeted in culture by numerically abundant species. Sometimes, culture-dependent techniques can even fail to detect some dominant microbial groups (20, 21). Second, the modern high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of DNA of all microbial nucleic acids (shotgun sequencing) present in a given cheeses provides a complete overview of the microbial community (22). Regarding wooden shelves used in cheese production, Guzzon et al. (23) applied 454 pyrosequencing to study the biofilms hosted onto the planks for smear Fontina cheese ripening, finding a cause-effect relationship between the dominant Actinobacteria and the red-brown pigmentation defect.

Based on the above considerations, the present work was carried out to characterize the wooden shelves used for the ripening of three typical and traditional cheese typologies (PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses) produced in Sicily by a combined culture-dependent and HTS approach. The microbial biofilms were microscopically investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before being analyzed by MiSeq Illumina technology and subjected to plate counts. The dominant bacteria were phenotypically and genetically grouped and identified.

RESULTS

Scanning electron microscopy of wooden shelf biofilms.

The photographs taken during SEM analysis of wood splinters collected from the wooden shelves used to ripen PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses in 18 dairy facilities are reported in Fig. 1. Although the majority of shelves were characterized by continuous microbial attachments, some samples such as those from WSD (i.e., wooden shelf from factory D) and WSQ showed only a few cells. Also, when the biofilms covered almost the entire surface of the wooden shelves, some woody roughness is clearly visible as per the WSE, WSF, WSL, WSM, WSN, WSO, and WSS samples. However, unlike the wooden vats used for milk curdling, the wooden shelves used for cheese ripening were not generally characterized by the extracellular polysaccharide structures typical of bacterial biofilms. SEM inspection was useful to recognize cocci and rods and to predict their proportions. In particular, the majority of biofilms were dominated by coccus-shaped populations, but the shelves WSG, WSH, WSN, and WSR showed a consistent presence of short rod bacteria. Yeast cells were frequently detected, especially for the shelves WSC, WSI, and WSO and a few fungal hyphae were also found (samples from WSA and WST), confirming the complexity of the microbial community of the shelves used to ripen traditional Sicilian cheeses.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Scanning electron microscopy observations of wooden splinters collected from wooden shelves used to ripen PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses in 18 dairy facilities. Abbreviations: WSA to -T, wooden shelves from factories A to T, respectively. Red ovals highlight limited bacterial aggregations, yellow ovals highlight the woody roughness of the board surfaces, and green arrows indicate fungal hyphae.

Taxonomic distribution of wooden shelf bacteria.

The extracted DNA was always successfully amplified in the bacterial V3-V4 16S rRNA gene region. A total of 954,257 paired-end sequences had been obtained. The taxonomy classification allowed to identify 14 phyla, 32 classes, 52 orders, 93 families, and 137 genera. Figure 2 shows the relative abundance (%) of the operational taxonomy units (OTUs) identified in the biofilms collected from the wooden shelves sampled. The OTUs with an individual relative abundance below 0.1% were not considered since this is the threshold indicated for abundant communities (24).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Relative abundances (%) of bacteria identified by MiSeq Illumina from the biofilms on the wooden shelves used to ripen PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses in 18 dairy facilities. The amplification occurred on a 464-nucleotide sequence of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Only taxa occurring at >0.1% abundance in at least one sample were included. Abbreviations: WSA to -T, wooden shelves from factories A to T, respectively.

All wooden shelves hosted Staphylococcus equorum in abundances that ranged from 2.28% of the OTUs of the sample from WSP to 64.75% of those of WST. Among other staphylococci, not detected in WSM, their abundance did not exceed 4.54% (in WSQ), and the abundance was below 1% in the majority of shelves. Micrococcaceae were not consistently present in most of the shelves, but detected at very high levels in WSA. Within this family, Kocuria was detected in two samples, from WSN and WSP, at 0.29 and 6.95%, respectively. Other bacterial groups associated with surface ripening, such as Brevibacterium and Corynebacterium, were identified in almost all wooden shelves, except WSL (negative for both genera) and WSN (negative for Corynebacterium). Their incidence among the wooden shelf biofilms was quite variable: basically below 10% for both in most of the samples, but Brevibacterium OTUs accounted for almost 50% in WSM biofilm. Except for three shelves, Brachybacterium was detected in all other samples at very high percentages in WSB, WSG, WSM, and WSS biofilms. A similar trend was observed for Bacillaceae.

Among halophilic or halotolerant species, Halomonas was mainly found on the shelves WSB, WSH and WSL, Tetragenococcus halophilus on WSC, WSG, and WSI, and Chromohalobacter on WSE, WSF, WSL, and WSN. The halophilic groups Salimicrobium, Marinococcus, Salegentibacter, Haererehalobacter, Marinobacter, and Idiomarinaceae and the moderately halophilic Salinicoccus, Psychrobacter, and Salinisphaera were found in a few shelves, and their abundance was particularly variable.

Besides the halophilic tetragenococci, the LAB community of the wooden shelves was represented by the Leuconostoceae family, with Leuconostoc mesenteroides the only species identified, as well as Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Streptococcus. Lactobacillus was basically present at very low levels, even though in samples WSI and WST, the Lactobacillus OTUs represented 33.12 and 14.18%, respectively. Pediococci and leuconostocs were detected at low percentages in a few samples, only the wooden shelf WSP showed their presence at 2.20 and 5.46%. Similar findings were observed for lactococci and streptococci, generally identified in a few samples at low concentrations, but the shelves WSF, WSP, and WST showed their abundance between almost 5 and 20%.

The other bacterial groups showed an overall low relative abundance, but in one of very few samples, their presence was found at particularly high percentages, like Bartonellaceae reaching 40.13% in WSQ, Dietzia with 28.36% in WSG, and Nesterenkonia with 11.60% in WSF. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family were detected at very low abundances in only four wooden shelves. Acinetobacter johnsonii was found only in two samples, but in one case (WSP), its abundance was 11.79%. Other acinetobacters were detected in WSO and WSP biofilms at 0.36 and 1.09%, respectively. WSP biofilm also hosted 5.13% Chryseobacterium, which was also found at very low levels in the WSQ sample. The last two shelves included Sphingomonadaceae among their communities. Sphingobacteriaceae were found not only in WSP and WSQ biofilms, but also on the surface of WSD, WSH, and WSR shelves at low percentages.

Clostridia were found in several biofilms, but their percentages were quite low: the highest level (3.19%) was displayed by the WSL sample. A low incidence of Rhodobacteriaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Oxalobacteriaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, and Erwinia was found in a few samples. Alcanivorax was detected at consistent levels (4.81%) only in WSH biofilm and was also found in SWB at very low levels (0.73%).

Levels of viable microorganisms.

The results of the plate counts of the main food microbial groups are reported in Table 1. According to Tukey’s test, statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) were found for the levels of all microbial groups that were the objects of investigation. Total mesophilic microorganisms (TMM) ranged between 2.4 and 7.8 log CFU/cm2, indicating a consistent numerical difference among the 18 shelves analyzed. The lowest loads were enumerated for WSF, used for 13 years, while the youngest shelf (WSO), barely used for 1 year, displayed TMM levels of 6.1 log CFU/cm2. The cell densities were highly variable on the different wood types. On average, TMM were 5.0, 5.1, and 5.8 log CFU/cm2 on the shelves used for PDO Piacentinu Ennese, Caciocavallo Palermitano, and PDO Pecorino Siciliano cheeses, respectively.

TABLE 1.

Microbial loadsa of wooden shelf biofilms

Samplea Bacterial count (log CFU/cm2) ofb:
TMM Enterobacteriaceae Total coliforms E. coli Pseudomonads Enterococci Rod LAB
Coccus LAB
Yeasts Molds
MRS at 30°C MRS at 44°C M17 at 30°C M17 at 44°C
WSA 6.1 ± 0.2 BCD 2.1 ± 0.2 C 0 D <1 D 3.8 ± 0.3 BC 2.2 ± 0.2 DEF 4.1 ± 0.2 DEF 0 H 6.2 ± 0.2 BC 1.5 ± 0.1 F 3.7 ± 0.2 GH <1 G
WSB 5.8 ± 0.3 CDE 0 E 0 D <1 D 5.7 ± 0.4 A 2.2 ± 0.1 DEF 4.8 ± 0.4 BCD 2.3 ± 0.1 E 6.0 ± 0.5 BCD 1.6 ± 0.2 F 2.7 ± 0.2 IJ 1.8 ± 0.1 F
WSC 6.0 ± 0.2 BCD 4.9 ± 0.3 A 4.3 ± 0.3 A 4.7 ± 0.3 A 5.8 ± 0.3 A 2.6 ± 0.3 CDE 5.3 ± 0.5 B 3.2 ± 0.2 CD 5.6 ± 0.4 BCD 3.0 ± 0.2 D 3.4 ± 0.4 HI 2.0 ± 0.3 EF
WSD 5.0 ± 0.2 EF 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 2.0 ± 0.2 EFG 3.0 ± 0.2 GH 1.1 ± 0.1 G 5.0 ± 0.4 D 1.8 ± 0.3 F 2.1 ± 0.2 JK 1.8 ± 0.2 F
WSE 6.3 ± 0.2 BC 2.0 ± 0.2 C 0 D <1 D 3.3 ± 0.2 C 1.1 ± 0.1 I 3.9 ± 0.3 EF 1.7 ± 0.2 F 6.5 ± 0.5 B 6.0 ± 0.4 A 6.3 ± 0.2 AB 2.1 ± 0.2 EF
WSF 2.4 ± 0.1 H 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 1.9 ± 0.2 EFGH 1.3 ± 0.1 J 0 H 1.6 ± 0.2 F 1.3 ± 0.2 F 1.8 ± 0.2 K 2.6 ± 0.3 E
WSG 5.5 ± 0.3 CDE 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 1.5 ± 0.2 FGHI 4.3 ± 0.2 CDE 0 H 5.2 ± 0.3 CD 1.8 ± 0.2 F 4.8 ± 0.3 DEF 4.9 ± 0.4 AB
WSH 7.8 ± 0.4 A 3.6 ± 0.2 B 3.3 ± 0.2 B 3.5 ± 0.2 B 5.2 ± 0.3 A 4.1 ± 0.4 A 8.2 ± 0.3 A 4.2 ± 0.2 A 8.1 ± 0.3 A 4.4 ± 0.3 B 6.4 ± 0.2 AB 4.8 ± 0.3 AB
WSI 6.8 ± 0.2 B 0 E 0 D <1 D 4.3 ± 0.2 B 1.3 ± 0.1 GHI 5.3 ± 0.3 B 0 H 5.9 ± 0.3 BCD 0 G 6.8 ± 0.1 A 5.4 ± 0.4 A
WSL 5.3 ± 0.4 DE 1.3 ± 0.1 D 1.2 ± 0.1 C <1 D 4.0 ± 0.2 B 3.5 ± 0.3 AB 3.4 ± 0.2 FG 3.4 ± 0.3 CD 6.6 ± 0.4 B 4.0 ± 0.2 BC 5.2 ± 0.3 CDE <1 G
WSM 5.4 ± 0.3 DE 0 E 0 D <1 D 4.3 ± 0.3 B 1.6 ± 0.1 FGHI 1.9 ± 0.1 IJ 1.5 ± 0.2 FG 5.8 ± 0.3 BCD 1.8 ± 0.1 F 5.4 ± 0.3 CD 3.4 ± 0.3 D
WSN 4.2 ± 0.3 FG 0 E 0 D <1 D 3.3 ± 0.2 C 3.5 ± 0.4 AB 3.5 ± 0.3 EFG 3.5 ± 0.3 BC 3.8 ± 0.4 E 3.4 ± 0.3 CD 4.4 ± 0.2 EFG <1 G
WSO 6.1 ± 0.4 BCD 1.8 ± 0.2 C 1.1 ± 0.1 C 1.7 ± 0.1 C 5.7 ± 0.4 A 4.0 ± 0.3 A 3.9 ± 0.3 EF 4.0 ± 0.3 AB 6.4 ± 0.4 B 4.0 ± 0.2 BC 5.9 ± 0.4 BC 4.0 ± 0.2 CD
WSP 3.8 ± 0.2 G 0 E 0 D <1 D 2.5 ± 0.2 D 3.2 ± 0.3 BC 4.0 ± 0.4 DEF 2.9 ± 0.3 D 3.9 ± 0.3 E 2.7 ± 0.2 DE 4.4 ± 0.3 EFG <1 G
WSQ 3.7 ± 0.2 G 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 1.2 ± 0.1 HI 1.4 ± 0.1 J 1.7 ± 0.2 F 1.4 ± 0.1 F 1.3 ± 0.1 F 4.1 ± 0.3 FGH 4.2 ± 0.3 BC
WSR 4.0 ± 0.3 G 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 1.8 ± 0.2 FGHI 2.3 ± 0.3 HI 0 H 3.7 ± 0.3 E 2.0 ± 0.2 EF 4.0 ± 0.2 FGH 2.5 ± 0.2 EF
WSS 6.0 ± 0.3 BCD 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 1.7 ± 0.2 FGHI 3.9 ± 0.3 EF 1.7 ± 0.1 F 6.1 ± 0.3 BC 3.2 ± 0.3 D 4.2 ± 0.2 FGH 3.8 ± 0.3 CD
WST 6.1 ± 0.3 BCD 0 E 0 D <1 D <1 E 2.8 ± 0.2 BCD 5.0 ± 0.3 BC 4.1 ± 0.3 A 6.3 ± 0.2 B 4.6 ± 0.3 B 6.0 ± 0.3 ABC <1 G
a

WSA to -T, wooden shelves from factories A to T, respectively.

b

TMM, total mesophilic microorganisms. Results are means ± standard deviations from four plate counts (carried out in duplicates for two independent samplings). Data within a column followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s tests (P < 0.0001).

The four LAB groups (mesophilic and thermophilic rods and cocci) investigated were consistently present in all samples, with the exception of thermophilic cocci on WSI and thermophilic rods on WSA, WSF, WSG, WSI, and WSR. On average, mesophilic cocci were detected at the highest cell densities within the LAB group. The highest levels were observed for the shelf SWH, both for mesophilic rods (8.2 log CFU/cm2) and for cocci (8.1 log CFU/cm2). In the majority of the shelves analyzed, the levels of mesophilic LAB cocci were comparable to those of TMM, suggesting a dominance of LAB among the members of the wooden shelf viable bacterial community. In the case of WSL, the latter group (6.6 log CFU/cm2) was even more represented than TMM (5.3 log CFU/cm2). However, the presence of LAB was extremely variable, since low numbers for all four LAB groups were found for the shelves WSF and WSQ or for some of these groups, generally the thermophilic ones. Aside from the group of LAB, enterococci were also enumerated. These bacteria were present in all samples, and their numbers did not exceed 4.1 log CFU/cm2; the highest Enterococcus cell density was detected in the WSH shelf, the one characterized by the greatest presence of LAB. Regarding members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, they were detected in a viable state on only six wooden shelves, while the subgroup of total coliforms was present in four samples. The levels of pseudomonad bacteria were between 2.5 and 5.8 log CFU/cm2 in 11 samples and were below the detection limit for the rest of the shelves analyzed.

Filamentous and unicellular fungi were also investigated on the wooden shelves. Molds were not detected in samples from WSA, WSL, WSN, WSP, and WST, and their levels ranged between 1.8 and 5.4 log CFU/cm2 in all other shelves. Yeasts developed from all biofilms analyzed ranged from a minimum of 1.8 log CFU/cm2 in WSF to 6.8 log CFU/cm2 in WSI.

Microbiological and hygiene criteria for foodstuffs.

Only three shelves presented viable E. coli. In particular, the shelves WSH and WSC were characterized by consistent numbers (3.3 and 4.3 log CFU/cm2, respectively). In order to specifically investigate the presence of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC), the isolates at the highest numbers were processed by PCR to detect STEC genes, and all E. coli cultures from the wooden board biofilms lacked this virulence factor. The presence of coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS), Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes was never found (for this reason, these results are not reported in Table 1), indicating that these pathogens were not present on the wooden boards analyzed.

Differentiation, identification, and distribution of viable LAB.

Eighty hundred seventy-one colonies were collected from the highest-cell-suspension dilutions of the wooden shelf biofilms plated on the agar media used for LAB counting. A total of 818 isolates were considered presumptive LAB, being Gram positive and unable to split H2O2 into H2O and O2. After microscopic inspection, based on morphology and cell arrangement, these cultures were grouped into three main groups: rods, cocci in tetrads, and cocci in short chains. Rod bacteria (39 isolates) constituted barely the minor part of the presumptive LAB community, since the vast majority (779 isolates) of them shared a coccus shape. The combination of all phenotypic features evaluated separated all LAB into only 11 groups (Table 2). LAB rods constituted a single group (I) characterized by a homofermentative metabolism, while cocci were allotted into two groups for tetrads (X and XI) and eight groups (II to IX) for the other bacteria, all forming short chains of cells. Among these, four groups (II to V) were able to generate CO2 from glucose, displaying an obligate heterofermentative metabolism. Six groups, including group I, showed thermophilic characteristics, but only the groups VI, X, and XI resisted treatment at 60°C for 30 min. The groups from VI to X were able to grow at high pHs, and the majority of the groups grew under hypersaline conditions.

TABLE 2.

Phenotypic grouping of LAB isolated from wooden shelf biofilms

Characteristic Result for clustera:
1 (n = 39) 2 (n = 4) 3 (n = 7) 4 (n = 65) 5 (n = 19) 6 (n = 46) 7 (n = 205) 8 (n = 119) 9 (n = 266) 10 (n = 19) 11 (n = 29)
Morphology R C C C C C C C C C C
Cell arrangement sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc tr tr
Growth at:
    15°C + + + + + + + + + +
    45°C + + + + + +
    pH 9.2 ND + + + + +
    6.5% NaCl ND + + + + + + + +
Resistance to 60°C + + +
Hydrolysis of:
    Arginine + + + +
    Esculin + + + + + + +
Acid production from:
    Arabinose + + + + + + +
    Ribose + + + + + + + +
    Xylose + + + + +
    Fructose + + + + + + + + + + +
    Galactose + + + + + + + + + +
    Lactose + + + + + + + + + +
    Sucrose + + + + + + + + +
    Glycerol + + + + + + + + + +
CO2 from glucose + + + +
a

Abbreviations: R, rod; C, coccus; sc, short chain; tr, tetrads; ND, not determined.

Within each group, 25% of isolates were taken as representative for the morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits shared by all cultures and genetically differentiated by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. RAPD patterns were used to construct a dendrogram, and 75 different profiles were recognized among the 205 isolates processed. Thus, the 75 isolates characterized by different RAPD profiles were considered different strains and subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification. All 75 strains were confirmed to belong to the LAB group as Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Weissella. As shown in Fig. 3, the great majority of the strains were allotted into nine species within the genus Enterococcus. Almost all enterococci (52 on a total of 54 strains) formed a mega-cluster at ca. 30% homology. In particular, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium were the most numerous species and also showed the highest biodiversity among the members of the wooden shelf viable LAB community. Two En. faecium strains (WS4 and WS251) grouped outside the mega-cluster of enterococci. Except Ln. mesenteroides strains, which formed two distant clusters, and the two Weissella species, which clustered quite far from one another, all other strains grouped by species, such as Lactococcus lactis, and pediococci, which formed distinct clusters. The only two rod-shaped LAB were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii and formed a single cluster very distant from the other species.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Dendrogram obtained from combined RAPD-PCR patterns generated with three primers of the LAB strains identified from the biofilms on the wooden shelves used to ripen PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses in 18 dairy facilities. Abbreviations: WSA to -T, wooden shelves from factories A to T, respectively; En., Enterococcus; Lb., Lactobacillus; Lc., Lactococcus; Ln., Leuconostoc; P., Pediococcus; W., Weissella; Acc. No., accession number for the 16S rRNA genes.

The dendrogram of Fig. 3 was also useful to perform a speciographic distribution of LAB among the wooden shelves used for cheese ripening. Except for the shelves WSD and WSR, E. faecium was part of the biofilms on all other shelves. E. faecalis was detected in six different biofilms, while the other species were randomly distributed. In particular, the shelves WSF, WSG, WSO, WSQ, SWR, and WSS were characterized by a single viable LAB species, Weissella paramesenteroides, on WSR and E. faecium on the other shelves.

DISCUSSION

According to the diversity of cheeses reported by McSweeney et al. (25), Caciocavallo Palermitano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and PDO Pecorino Siciliano cheeses are all internally bacterially ripened semihard and hard cheeses. These three cheese typologies are mainly characterized by the presence of LAB species during ripening (2, 26, 27). Since they are not inoculated on their surfaces, surface ripening is not considered to occur to the same extent as surface-inoculated smear cheeses, and the rind represents basically a protective barrier for the innermost cheese. For these cheeses, the surface microbiota constitutes a barrier against pathogen and spoilage microorganisms (28). Thus, the wooden shelves used to ripen traditional cheeses of this study were mainly investigated for the safety aspects related to the presence of pathogenic microorganisms.

The wooden shelves of 18 dairy facilities were investigated initially by SEM. This inspection was performed to verify the presence, evaluate the diversity, and observe the type of aggregation of the microbial cells. Microscopic analysis clearly indicated the presence of a mixed bacterial community of cocci and rods on all wooden shelves and showed a general dominance of cocci in the majority of the biofilms investigated. Some yeast cells were also observed, but at a lower frequency than bacteria. Entire coverage by microbial biofilms was also photographed by SEM on the surface of the wooden vats used to transform milk into traditional Sicilian cheeses (10, 15).

Due to the high power of identification and discrimination among microbial populations of next-generation sequencing tools, a high-throughput approach was necessary to investigate deeply the biodiversity of the bacterial biofilms of the wooden shelves used to ripen traditional Sicilian cheeses. S. equorum was present in all wooden shelves analyzed, and its percentage covered 2/3 of the total biodiversity. This species, generally found in raw milk and cheeses (29), including smear-ripened cheeses (30), is salt tolerant (31, 32), isolated at high percentages from cheese brine (33), and represents a starter culture component for surface-ripened semihard cheeses (34). The surface-ripening-associated bacteria Brevibacterium and Corynebacterium (35) were found in almost all wooden shelves, even at 50%. Generally, staphylococci are present at the beginning of smear cheese ripening, while coryneforms characterize the later stages (36). Brachybacteria were also detected in the majority of the biofilms investigated; they represent coryneforms isolated from the cheese surface (37) and have also been isolated from salt-fermented seafoods (38).

Several groups identified belong to halophilic or halotolerant species generally found in the brines used for cheese salting (33). In particular, Salimicrobium, Marinococcus, Salegentibacter, Haererehalobacter, Marinobacter, and Idiomarinaceae are halophilic (3944), while Salinicoccus, Psychrobacter, and Salinisphaera are moderately halophilic (4547). All of these species detected on the wooden surfaces of the shelves used for cheese ripening might derive from the sea salt added to the cheese brines (33). Very recently, halophilic bacteria were also detected on the surface of the wooden boards used for cheese ripening in the United States (48).

The LAB community of the wooden shelves included five genera. In general, except for members of Tetragenococcus, LAB do not show a high salt tolerance: enterococci, Leuconostoc citreum, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously known as Lactobacillus plantarum and renamed by Zheng et al. [49]) are reported among the mostly halotolerant LAB (5052).

Several other bacterial groups were identified, but most of them showed an overall low relative abundance, even though Bartonellaceae, Dietzia, and Nesterenkonia were consistent in a few shelf samples. Bartonella spp. are Gram-negative bacteria found in mammalian erythrocytes and endothelial cells transmitted by blood-feeding arthropod ectoparasites (53), probably vectored to the shelves by rodents (54) or mites (55). The genus Dietzia includes psychrophilic alkaliphile species (56), while Nesterenkonia is another halotolerant genus (57). Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, indicating the presence of fecal bacteria due to fecal contaminations (58), were detected in a very few samples. A. johnsonii, reported as a fish pathogen bacterium (59), was found at consistent level only in one sample. Regarding the other populations detected, Sphingobacteriaceae are components of the microbiota of different types of soil (60, 61), Sphingomonadaceae have different habitats, including seawater (62, 63), and Alcanivorax is a marine bacterium.

From a deep comparison with the bacterial composition of the biofilms of the wooden shelves used for the ripening of Fontina cheese (23), a smear-ripened cheese produced in the Valle d’Aosta region of northern Italy, investigated by Illumina technology, it was found that several groups are typically associated with smear cheese production. Hence, based on metagenomics data from the present study, the shelves might transfer to the cheese surface mainly smear-active bacteria, which are responsible for the centripetal maturation of cheese (64), suggesting that the crust of PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses does not play exclusively a passive protective role, but also contributes to the development of the final organoleptic properties of the ripened products.

Although HTS provided a wide and deep bacterial picture of the wooden shelves used to ripen traditional Sicilian cheeses, the plate count technique was applied to estimate the numbers of the viable cells of the main dairy microbial populations. The levels of TMM found on the 18 wooden shelves that were the object of investigation are slightly higher than those reported by Galinari et al. (65) for total aerobic mesophiles on the shelves used for ripening Serro and Canastra cheeses (4.7 and 4.6 log CFU/cm2, respectively) produced in Brazil. On the contrary, higher numbers were detected for the total microbial population on the shelves used for the ripening of Reblochon de Savoie smear cheese (>7.0 log CFU/cm2) produced in France (16) and for the total bacterial count on the wooden shelves used for Fontina cheese in northern Italy (23). On average, the levels of LAB detected in our study are comparable with those reported by Galinari et al. (65), who found lactococci and lactobacilli in the range 4.0 to 4.7 log CFU/cm2 for the wooden shelves of Brazilian cheese ripening. All wooden shelves were also positive for the presence of enterococci in the range 1.1 to 4.1 log CFU/cm2. Similar data (2.2 to 4.3 log CFU/cm2) were reported by Mariani et al. (16).

In order to better characterize the LAB community, also in view of their possible future application to develop ad hoc biofilms on the surface of wooden shelves, the dominant cultures were isolated, phenotypically grouped, genetically differentiated, and identified. LAB cocci represented the majority of isolates. Except for one group including rod-shaped bacteria, LAB included mesophilic, thermophilic, heterofermentative, and homofermentative cocci in linear short chains or tetrads, and some of them were able to grow at high pHs and in the presence of high salt concentrations. The entire community was composed of 75 strains belonging to 16 LAB species. Surprisingly, more than 2/3 of the strains were Enterococcus, even though HTS did not reveal their presence. The discrepancy among the results obtained after the isolation procedure and DNA-based Illumina technology could be due to the fact that Enterococcus strains were part of the unassigned OTUs of total bacterial community, they were below 0.1% abundance, or their DNAs were rendered inaccessible by nucleases. Similar results were observed also for food matrices (6668). In particular, nine species within this genus were identified. Basically, the species mostly represented were En. faecium, En. faecalis, and Ln. mesenteroides, but Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Lactobacillus, and Weissella were also identified. Considering RAPD patterns, the strains grouped by species, but in some cases, a mixed-species clustering was observed. This trend is common when dairy LAB from wooden biofilms are subjected to a strain typing analysis (13). Most of the species identified from the wooden shelves are generally associated with dairy environments, such as raw milk (69), cheeses (70), animal rennets (71), and wooden vats (13). In particular, Enterococcus viikkiensis is generally identified in ewe’s milk only (72), Enterococcus thailandicus was found in different African dairy traditional fermented products different from cheeses (73, 74) and Weissella hellenica from kimchi (75) a nondairy fermented product.

In light of the Commission Regulation (EC) no. 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (14), Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were analyzed by food safety criteria, while E. coli and CPS were analyzed by process hygiene criteria. E. coli was found in only three samples, while CPS, Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes were not found in any sample. In general, also the other works on the wooden shelf characterization reported a low frequency of coliforms: in particular, Mariani et al. (16) found this group below 2.2 log CFU/cm2, and even lower levels were detected by Galinari et al. (65). Based on the EU One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report (76), STEC infections are the most frequently reported zoonoses after campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis. For this reason, the presence of STEC was specifically investigated in this study. The PCR approach applied clearly indicated that none of the E. coli colonies developed from the wooden board biofilms analyzed in this study were STEC. Fifty-five percent of the samples were characterized by the presence of pseudomonad bacteria (2.5 to 5.8 log CFU/cm2). An average presence of 3.0 log CFU/cm2 was observed for the shelves used to ripen Reblochon de Savoie smear cheeses (16).

Molds developed from 15 wooden shelves, while yeasts were found in all biofilms analyzed. The presence of these groups is often investigated in cheese, because they play a double role. Regarding yeasts, they might contribute to the centripetal maturation of smear cheeses because they engage in a degradation of lactate, determining a deacidification of the cheese surface where pH increases, stimulating the growth of corynebacteria (77). However, yeasts are also responsible for cheese spoilage, generating undesirable flavor compounds, gas development, surface discoloration, and textural changes (78). If on one hand the role of molds is important to produce soft cheese ripened with surface molds (Camembert and Brie) or to produce blue vein cheeses (Roquefort and Gorgonzola) (79, 80), their contamination can be detrimental to cheese quality—first of all for the generation of potentially toxic secondary metabolites (mycotoxins), but also for their off-flavor and appearance defects (81).

In conclusion, the combined approach applied in this study showed that most bacterial groups identified from the wooden shelves used for the ripening of PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano cheeses are typically associated with smear cheeses. Both food safety and process hygiene criteria of EC no. 2073/2005 were almost completely respected; even though E. coli populations were detected on three shelves, they were not STEC strains. Several bacterial taxa belonged to the halophilic/halotolerant group. The effective role of wooden shelf bacteria and fungi has to be more deeply examined in order to better evaluate their contribution to the cheese safety and maturation generating the organoleptic properties at the end of ripening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of wooden shelf biofilms.

The microbial biofilms associated with the wooden shelves used to ripen three typical Sicilian cheese typologies (PDO Pecorino Siciliano, PDO Piacentinu Ennese, and Caciocavallo Palermitano) (Fig. 4) were collected during ripening from 18 dairy facilities in central and western Sicily within the provinces of Agrigento, Enna, Palermo, and Trapani (Table 3). In particular, the contact of PDO Piacentinu Ennese cheese with the boards lasted 1 to 2 months, while those of the other two cheeses lasted 4 to 5 months. Each facility produces only one cheese type; hence, all wooden boards hosted only one cheese type during ripening. The shelves of all 18 facilities were cleaned once a year, at the end of the summer season, by a thorough brushing followed by being washed with a pressure washer. Square wood splinters of approximately 2 by 2 cm with a thickness of ca. 1 to 2 mm were aseptically cut from each wooden shelf surface with a sterile scalpel (destructive approach) and kept in Falcon tubes. Furthermore, a surface of 100 cm2 was delimited on each wooden shelf using a sterile Area Space 100 paper square (VWR International PBI s.r.l., Milan, Italy) and kept under aseptic conditions by a portable Bunsen burner. The microbial populations were collected by the nondestructive brushing technique described by Didienne et al. (11). Briefly, a sterile toothbrush was rubbed vigorously onto the 100-cm2 surface, and a complete collection of the microorganisms was obtained with gauze. Subsequently, the toothbrush was shaken into a sterile Durham bottle containing 100 ml of Ringer’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy), and the gauze was transferred into the same bottle. Both surfaces sampled by destructive and nondestructive technique were adjacent and collected within the area below the cheeses. Wooden biofilms and splinters were transported by a portable fridge at the laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology of the University of Palermo (Italy). Wooden shelf surface collection was performed in duplicate (technical repeats), considering two cheeses distant approximately 1 m from one another on the same board, and repeated after 1 month for a total of four repetitions in two independent collections.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Ripening of traditional Sicilian raw milk cheeses on wooden shelves. (A) PDO Pecorino Siciliano cheese. (B) PDO Piacentinu Ennese cheese. (C) Caciocavallo Palermitano cheese. For ripening, the cheeses are placed in 1 or 2 rows, depending on the width of the board (30 to 60 cm), at a distance of 3 to 5 cm from one another. The length of the boards varies from 2 to 4 m, and the height varies from 3 to 5 cm.

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of the wooden shelves used for traditional Sicilian cheese ripening

Wooden shelfa City of dairy factory (province)b Age of shelf (yr) Type of woodc Cheese typology
WSA Santo Stefano Quisquina (AG) 16 Silver fir PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSB Santo Stefano Quisquina (AG) 16 Chestnut Caciocavallo Palermitano
WSC Castronovo di Sicilia (PA) 15 Silver fir PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSD Godrano (PA) 8 Chestnut Caciocavallo Palermitano
WSE Santa Margherita del Belìce (AG) 8 Chestnut PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSF Partanna (TP) 13 Chestnut PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSG Santa Ninfa (TP) 11 Silver fir PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSH Gibellina (TP) 5 Silver fir PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSI Salemi (TP) 8 Silver fir PDO Pecorino Siciliano
WSL Aidone (EN) 18 Chestnut PDO Piacentinu Ennese
WSM Calascibetta (EN) 7 Chestnut PDO Piacentinu Ennese
WSN Assoro (EN) 10 Chestnut PDO Piacentinu Ennese
WSO Enna (EN) 1 Swedish pine PDO Piacentinu Ennese
WSP Barrafranca (EN) 13 Chestnut PDO Piacentinu Ennese
WSQ Godrano (PA) 2 Silver fir Caciocavallo Palermitano
WSR Godrano (PA) 4 Chestnut Caciocavallo Palermitano
WSS Godrano (PA) 10 Stone pine Caciocavallo Palermitano
WST Godrano (PA) 3 Common beech Caciocavallo Palermitano
a

WSA to -T, wooden shelves from factories A to T, respectively.

b

Province codes: AG, Agrigento; EN, Enna; PA, Palermo; TP, Trapani.

c

Tree species: silver fir, Abies alba L.; chestnut, Castanea sativa Miller; Swedish pine, Pinus sylvestris L.; stone pine, Pinus pinea L.; common beech, Fagus sylvatica L.

Scanning electron microscopy.

The presence of the biofilms on the surface of the wooden shelves was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the FEI ESEM Quanta 200 apparatus (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA) at the Department of Engineering of University of Palermo (Italy). The splinters were dehydrated (82) and dried (10) before being mounted on an aluminum holder. All the samples were sputter coated with a thin layer of gold (83) under argon atmosphere for 90 s (Scancoat Six; Edwards, Crawley, United Kingdom) in order to avoid electrostatic charging under the electron beam.

Culture-independent microbiological analysis.

Microbial cell suspensions from the wooden shelves (10 ml) were centrifuged at 3,200 × g for 15 min at 4°C (26) and total genomic DNAs from biofilms were extracted using the Power Food Microbial DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. No negative control, prepared as a “blank” DNA extraction, was done to check if contaminations were introduced to samples by the DNA extraction method used. In order to prevent the well-to-well contamination (contamination among close processed samples), the single-tube method was preferred to plate-based DNA extraction because the plate-based method was documented (84) as the primary form of well-to-well contamination rather than PCR and single-tube DNA extraction methods. Biofilm DNAs were then purified using the PowerClean DNA Cleanup kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc.) and subjected to quantification through Nanodrop8800 fluorospectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, NC) reading. The DNA collected from all 72 biofilms sampled (duplicate samples collected on two distinct collection days per dairy factory) was pooled as four individual wooden shelves per pool in 18 pools representing the 18 dairy factories. A proper balance of the DNA quantity was obtained in each pool to obtain equal representation for each biofilm.

Amplicon library preparation, quality determination and quantification of pooled libraries, and paired-end sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina, USA) were performed at the Sequencing Platform, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), San Michele a/Adige, Italy. Briefly, for each sample, a 464-nucleotide sequence of the V3-V4 region (85, 86) of the 16S rRNA gene (Escherichia coli positions 341 to 805) was amplified. Unique barcodes were attached before the forward primers to facilitate the pooling and subsequent differentiation of samples. To prevent preferential sequencing of the smaller amplicons, the amplicons were cleaned using the Agencourt AMPure kit (Beckman coulter) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; subsequently, DNA concentrations of the amplicons were determined using the Quant-iT PicoGreen double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In order to ensure the absence of primer dimers and to assay the purity, the generated amplicon libraries quality was evaluated by a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using an Agilent high-sensitivity DNA kit. Following the quantitation, cleaned amplicons were mixed and combined in equimolar ratios.

Raw paired-end FASTQ files were demultiplexed using idemp (https://github.com/yhwu/idemp/blob/master/idemp.cpp) and imported into Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (Qiime2, version 2018.2). Sequences were quality filtered, trimmed, denoised, and merged using DADA2 (87). Chimeric sequences had been identified and removed via the consensus method in DADA2. Taxonomic and compositional analyses were carried on by using the plugins feature-classifier (https://github.com/qiime2/q2-feature-classifier). A pretrained naive Bayes classifier based on the Greengenes 13_8 99% Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) database, which had been previously trimmed to the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes, bound by the 341F/805R primer pair, was applied to paired-end sequence reads to generate taxonomy tables.

Classical microbiological investigation.

Wooden shelf surface biofilms were serially diluted applying a 1:10 dilution factor in Ringer’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). All cell suspensions were then subjected to the plate count technique followed by an appropriate incubation to enumerate total mesophilic microorganisms (TMM), LAB, including enterococci and the main undesired spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. TMM were detected on plate count agar (PCA) supplemented with 1 g/liter skimmed milk, after aerobic incubation at 30°C for 72 h. Thermophilic and mesophilic LAB cocci were detected on M17 agar, after anaerobic incubation at 30 and 44°C, respectively, for 48 h. Thermophilic and mesophilic LAB rods were detected on de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) agar, acidified to pH 5.4 with lactic acid (5 mol liter−1), after anaerobic incubation at 30 and 44°C, respectively, for 48 h. Enterococci were detected on kanamycin esculin azide (KAA) agar, after aerobic incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family were detected on violet red bile glucose agar (VRBGA), after microaerobic incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) were detected on Baird Parker (BP) agar with added rabbit plasma fibrinogen, after aerobic incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Pseudomonads were detected on Pseudomonas agar base (PAB) supplemented with cephaloridine sodium fusidate cetrimide (CFC), after aerobic incubation at 25°C for 48 h. Yeasts were detected on dichloran Rose Bengal chloramphenicol (DRBC) agar, after aerobic incubation at 28°C for 48 h. Finally, molds were detected on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 0.1 g/liter chloramphenicol to avoid bacterial growth, after aerobic incubation at 25°C for 7 days. In compliance with Commission Regulation (EC) no. 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (14), besides CPS, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella spp. were also investigated. L. monocytogenes was detected on Listeria selective agar base (LSAB) added with SR0140E supplement, incubated at 37°C for 48 h, while E. coli and Salmonella spp. were detected on Hektoen enteric agar (HEA), incubated at 37°C for 24 h. All media and supplements were purchased from Oxoid (Milan, Italy). Anaerobiosis was realized in hermetically sealed jars containing the AnaeroGen AN25 system (Oxoid). Plate counts were performed in duplicate.

Isolation and identification of dominant LAB.

In order to characterize the living LAB community of the wooden shelves, Gram-positive (by treatment with 3% [wt/vol] KOH method) and catalase-negative (by treatment with 5% [vol/vol] H2O2) colonies developed from the highest dilutions of the biofilm cell suspensions plated on MRS and M17 at both incubation temperatures applied were isolated. In particular, at least five colonies sharing the same morphological characteristics (shape, size, margin edge, elevation, color, and opacity of surface) were collected for each colony typology from a given wooden shelf. When less than five colonies developed per morphology, all colonies available were isolated in order to cover the entire wooden shelf LAB diversity. All colonies were transferred into the corresponding broth media and, after overnight development in the optimal incubation conditions, were purified by several streakings onto agar media. Pure cultures were finally developed in liquid media supplemented with 20% glycerol (vol/vol) and stored at −80°C.

After colony differentiation, all isolates were further phenotypically characterized on the basis of cell morphology, growth at 15 and 45°C, resistance at 60°C for 30 min, NH3 production from arginine, esculin hydrolysis, acid production from carbohydrates, and CO2 production from glucose as reported by Di Grigoli et al. (2). Presumptive LAB cocci were also analyzed for their growth at pH 9.2 and in the presence of NaCl (6.5 g/liter) to preliminarily discriminate enterococci.

In order to perform a differentiation of the wooden shelf LAB at the strain level, a fingerprinting investigation based on the random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR analysis was carried out on genomic DNAs extracted from overnight-grown cultures using the InstaGene Matrix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Crude cell extracts were amplified using singly the primers M13 (88), AB111, and AB106 (89) under the conditions reported by Settanni et al. (12). RAPD patterns were then analyzed by GelCompar II software version 6.5 (Applied-Maths, Saint-Marten-Latem, Belgium) to obtain a dendrogram and evaluate the similarity among members of the LAB community.

All strains were genetically identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing performing PCRs as described by Weisburg et al. (90). Sequencing analysis were carried out at the AGRIVET Centre (University of Palermo, Italy) using the ABI Prism 3130xl genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The resulting sequences were aligned with those present in EzTaxon-e database (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/), which compares a given 16S rRNA gene sequence with only those of the type strains (91). The comparison of the sequences also occurred with 16S rRNA gene sequences available in GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The doubtful identity of Enterococcus was resolved by the sodA gene-based multiplex PCR assay of Jackson et al. (92).

Shiga-toxigenic E. coli detection.

In cases where E. coli colonies were detected, they were analyzed for their STEC genes. The multiplex PCR described by Osek (93) and designed on the basis of the genes coding for Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (stx1 and stx2) was applied to the E. coli isolates developed at the highest dilutions of the biofilms.

Statistical analyses.

Plate count data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using XLStat software version 7.5.2 for Excel (Addinsoft, New York, NY, USA). The Tukey’s test was applied for pairwise comparison between the different wooden shelf biofilms analyzed. Statistical significance was attributed to P values of P < 0.05.

Accession number(s).

The data generated by MiSeq Illumina sequencing were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and are available under accession no. PRJNA717160 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/717160). All sequences determined in this study were deposited in GenBank database under accession no. MW882982 to MW883056.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by AGER 2 Project, grant no. 2017-1144.

Contributor Information

Raimondo Gaglio, Email: raimondo.gaglio@unipa.it.

Johanna Björkroth, University of Helsinki.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Scatassa ML, Gaglio R, Macaluso G, Francesca N, Randazzo W, Cardamone C, Di Grigoli A, Moschetti G, Settanni L. 2015. Transfer, composition and technological characterization of the lactic acid bacterial populations of the wooden vats used to produce traditional stretched cheeses. Food Microbiol 52:31–41. 10.1016/j.fm.2015.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Di Grigoli A, Francesca N, Gaglio R, Guarrasi V, Moschetti M, Scatassa ML, Settanni L, Bonanno A. 2015. The influence of the wooden equipment employed for cheese manufacture on the characteristics of a traditional stretched cheese during ripening. Food Microbiol 46:81–91. 10.1016/j.fm.2014.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carpino S, Randazzo CL, Pino A, Russo N, Rapisarda T, Belvedere G, Caggia C. 2017. Influence of PDO Ragusano cheese biofilm microbiota on flavour compounds formation. Food Microbiol 61:126–135. 10.1016/j.fm.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Licitra G, Ogier JC, Parayre S, Pediliggieri C, Carnemolla TM, Falentin H, Madec MN, Carpino S, Lortal S. 2007. Variability of the bacterial biofilms of the “tina” wood vat used in the Ragusano cheese-making process. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6980–6987. 10.1128/AEM.00835-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cruciata M, Gaglio R, Todaro M, Settanni L. 2019. Ecology of Vastedda della valle del Belìce cheeses: a review and recent findings to stabilize the traditional production. Food Rev Int 35:90–103. 10.1080/87559129.2018.1469142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gaglio R, Todaro M, Settanni L. 2021. Improvement of raw milk cheese hygiene through selection of starter and non starter lactic acid bacteria: the successful case of PDO Pecorino Siciliano cheese. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:1834. 10.3390/ijerph18041834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2004. Commission regulation no. 1935/2004 of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC. Off J Eur Union 338:4–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aviat F, Gerhards C, Rodriguez-Jerez JJ, Michel V, Le Bayon I, Ismail R, Federighi M. 2016. Microbial safety of wood in contact with food: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15:491–505. 10.1111/1541-4337.12199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Commission Regulation. 2005. Commission regulation no 2074/2005 of 5 December 2005 laying down implementing measures for certain products under regulation (EC) no 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and for the organisation of official controls under regulation (EC) no 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and regulation (EC) no 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, derogating from regulation (EC) no 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending regulations (EC) no 853/2004 and (EC) no 854/2004. Off J Eur Union 338:27–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lortal S, Di Blasi A, Madec M-N, Pediliggieri C, Tuminello L, Tanguy G, Fauquant J, Lecuona Y, Campo P, Carpino S, Licitra G. 2009. Tina wooden vat biofilm. A safe and highly efficient lactic acid bacteria delivering system in PDO Ragusano cheese making. Int J Food Microbiol 132:1–8. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Didienne R, Defargues C, Callon C, Meylheuc T, Hulin S, Montel MC. 2012. Characteristics of microbial biofilm on wooden vats (‘gerles’) in PDO Salers cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 156:91–101. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Settanni L, Di Grigoli A, Tornambé G, Bellina V, Francesca N, Moschetti G, Bonanno A. 2012. Persistence of wild Streptococcus thermophilus strains on wooden vat and during the manufacture of a Caciocavallo type cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 155:73–81. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Scatassa ML, Cardamone C, Miraglia V, Lazzara F, Fiorenza G, Macaluso G, Arcuri L, Settanni L, Mancuso I. 2015b. Characterisation of the microflora contaminating wooden vats used for traditional Sicilian cheese production. Ital J Food Saf 4:4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Commission Regulation. 2005. Commission regulation no 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union 338:1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cruciata M, Gaglio R, Scatassa ML, Sala G, Cardamone C, Palmeri M, Moschetti G, La Mantia T, Settanni L. 2018. Formation and characterization of early bacterial biofilms on different wood typologies applied in dairy production. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02107-17. 10.1128/AEM.02107-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mariani C, Briandet R, Chamba JF, Notz E, Carnet-Pantiez A, Eyoug RN, Oulahal N. 2007. Biofilm ecology of wooden shelves used in ripening the French raw milk smear cheese Reblochon de Savoie. J Dairy Sci 90:1653–1661. 10.3168/jds.2006-190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bockelmann W, Willems KP, Neve H, Heller KH. 2005. Cultures for the ripening of smear cheeses. Int Dairy J 15:719–732. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mariani C, Oulahal N, Chamba JF, Dubois-Brissonnet F, Notz E, Briandet R. 2011. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by resident biofilms present on wooden shelves used for cheese ripening. Food Control 22:1357–1362. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Calasso M, Ercolini D, Mancini L, Stellato G, Minervini F, Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Gobbetti M. 2016. Relationships among house, rind and core microbiotas during manufacture of traditional Italian cheeses at the same dairy plant. Food Microbiol 54:115–126. 10.1016/j.fm.2015.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yunita D, Dodd CER. 2018. Microbial community dynamics of a blue-veined raw milk cheese from the United Kingdom. J Dairy Sci 101:4923–4935. 10.3168/jds.2017-14104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zotta T, Ricciardi A, Condelli N, Parente E. 2021. Metataxonomic and metagenomic approaches for the study of undefined strain starters for cheese manufacture. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 18:1–15. 10.1080/10408398.2020.1870927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mayo B, Rodríguez J, Vázquez L, Flórez AB. 2021. Microbial interactions within the cheese ecosystem and their application to improve quality and safety. Foods 10:602. 10.3390/foods10030602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guzzon R, Carafa I, Tuohy K, Cervantes G, Vernetti L, Barmaz A, Larcher R, Franciosi E. 2017. Exploring the microbiota of the red-brown defect in smear-ripened cheese by 454-pyrosequencing and its prevention using different cleaning systems. Food Microbiol 62:160–168. 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Logares R, Audic S, Bass D, Bittner L, Boutte C, Christen R, Claverie J-M, Decelle J, Dolan JR, Dunthorn M, Edvardsen B, Gobet A, Kooistra WHCF, Mahé F, Not F, Ogata H, Pawlowski J, Pernice MC, Romac S, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Simon N, Stoeck T, Santini S, Siano R, Wincker P, Zingone A, Richards TA, de Vargas C, Massana R. 2014. Patterns of rare and abundant marine microbial eukaryotes. Curr Biol 24:813–821. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McSweeney PLH, Ottogalli G, Fox PF. 2004. Diversity of cheese varieties: an overview, p 1–23. In Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, Guinne TP (ed), Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, 3th ed, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaglio R, Franciosi E, Todaro A, Guarcello R, Alfeo V, Randazzo CL, Settanni L, Todaro M. 2020. Addition of selected starter/non-starter lactic acid bacterial inoculums to stabilise PDO Pecorino Siciliano cheese production. Food Res Int 136:109335. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pino A, Russo N, Van Hoorde K, De Angelis M, Sferrazzo G, Randazzo CL, Caggia C. 2019. Piacentinu Ennese PDO cheese as reservoir of promising probiotic bacteria. Microorganisms 7:254. 10.3390/microorganisms7080254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Galanakis CM. 2019. Food quality and shelf life. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meugnier H, Bes M, Vernozy-Rozand C, Mazuy C, Brun Y, Freney J, Fleurette J. 1996. Identification and ribotyping of Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus equorum strains isolated from goat milk and cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 31:325–331. 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00975-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Irlinger F, Loux V, Bento P, Gibrat JF, Straub C, Bonnarme P, Landaud S, Monnet C. 2012. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus equorum subsp. equorum Mu2, isolated from a French smear-ripened cheese. J Bacteriol 194:5141–5142. 10.1128/JB.01038-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jeong DW, Han S, Lee JH. 2014. Safety and technological characterization of Staphylococcus equorum isolates from jeotgal, a Korean high-salt-fermented seafood, for starter development. Int J Food Microbiol 188:108–115. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jeong DW, Heo S, Ryu S, Blom J, Lee JH. 2017. Genomic insights into the virulence and salt tolerance of Staphylococcus equorum. Sci Rep 7:5383. 10.1038/s41598-017-05918-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vermote L, Verce M, De Vuyst L, Weckx S. 2018. Amplicon and shotgun metagenomic sequencing indicates that microbial ecosystems present in cheese brines reflect environmental inoculation during the cheese production process. Int Dairy J 87:44–53. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Place RB, Hiestand D, Gallmann HR, Teuber M. 2003. Staphylococcus equorum subsp. linens, subsp. nov, a starter culture component for surface ripened semi-hard cheeses. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:30–37. 10.1078/072320203322337281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mounier J, Rea MC, O'Connor PM, Fitzgerald GF, Cogan TM. 2007. Growth characteristics of Brevibacterium, Corynebacterium, Microbacterium, and Staphylococcus spp. isolated from surface-ripened cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7732–7739. 10.1128/AEM.01260-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rea MC, Görges S, Gelsomino R, Brennan NM, Mounier J, Vancanneyt M, Scherer S, Swings J, Cogan TM. 2007. Stability of the biodiversity of the surface consortia of Gubbeen, a red-smear cheese. J Dairy Sci 90:2200–2210. 10.3168/jds.2006-377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schubert K, Ludwig W, Springer N, Kroppenstedt RM, Accolas JP, Fiedler F. 1996. Two coryneform bacteria isolated from the surface of French gruyère and Beaufort cheeses are new species of the genus Brachybacterium: Brachybacterium alimentarium sp. nov. and Brachybacterium tyrofermentans sp. nov. r. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:81–87. 10.1099/00207713-46-1-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Park SK, Kim MS, Jung MJ, Nam YD, Park EJ, Roh SW, Bae JW. 2011. Brachybacterium squillarum sp. nov., isolated from salt-fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1118–1122. 10.1099/ijs.0.022517-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh TK. 2007. Reclassification of Marinococcus albus Hao et al. 1985 as Salimicrobium album gen. nov., comb. nov. and Bacillus halophilus Ventosa et al. 1990 as Salimicrobium halophilum comb. nov., and description of Salimicrobium luteum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2406–2411. 10.1099/ijs.0.65003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Do Quynh Nguyen A, Sekar A, Kim M, Phat Nguyen L, Thi Le N, Uh S, Hong S, Kim K. 2021. Fish sauce fermentation using Marinococcus halotolerans SPQ isolate as a starter culture. Food Sci Nutr 9:651–661. 10.1002/fsn3.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McCammon SA, Bowman JP. 2000. Taxonomy of Antarctic Flavobacterium species: description of Flavobacterium gillisiae sp. nov., Flavobacterium tegetincola sp. nov., and Flavobacterium xanthum sp. nov., nom. rev. and reclassification of [Flavobacterium] salegens as Salegentibacter salegens gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1055–1063. 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jean WD, Shieh WY, Chiu HH. 2006. Pseudidiomarina taiwanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from shallow coastal water of An-Ping Harbour, Taiwan, and emended description of the family Idiomarinaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:899–905. 10.1099/ijs.0.64048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Birdilla Selva Donio M, Chelladurai Karthikeyan S, Michaelbabu M, Uma G, Raja Jeya Sekar R, Citarasu T. 2018. Haererehalobacter sp. JS1, a bioemulsifier producing halophilic bacterium isolated from Indian solar salt works. J Basic Microbiol 58:597–608. 10.1002/jobm.201800056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huu NB, Denner EB, Ha DT, Wanner G, Stan-Lotter H. 1999. Marinobacter aquaeolei sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a Vietnamese oil-producing well. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:367–375. 10.1099/00207713-49-2-367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pakdeeto A, Tanasupawat S, Thawai C, Moonmangmee S, Kudo T, Itoh T. 2007. Lentibacillus kapialis sp. nov., from fermented shrimp paste in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:364–369. 10.1099/ijs.0.64315-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Antunes A, Eder W, Fareleira P, Santos H, Huber R. 2003. Salinisphaera shabanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, moderately halophilic bacterium from the brine-seawater interface of the Shaban Deep, Red Sea. Extremophiles 7:29–34. 10.1007/s00792-002-0292-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yoon JH, Kang KH, Park YH. 2003. Psychrobacter jeotgali sp. nov., isolated from jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:449–454. 10.1099/ijs.0.02242-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wadhawan K, Steinberger AJ, Rankin SA, Suen G, Czuprynski CJ. 2021. Characterizing the microbiota of wooden boards used for cheese ripening. JDS Commun 2:171–176. 10.3168/jdsc.2020-0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, Watanabe K, Wuyts S, Felis GE, Gänzle MG, Lebeer S. 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2782–2858. 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.González‐Quijano GK, Dorantes‐Alvarez L, Hernández‐Sánchez H, Jaramillo‐Flores ME, de Jesús Perea‐Flores M, Vera‐Ponce de León A, Hernández‐Rodríguez C. 2014. Halotolerance and survival kinetics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from jalapeño pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fermentation. J Food Sci 79:M1545–M1553. 10.1111/1750-3841.12498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Esteban-Torres M, Landete JM, Reverón I, Santamaría L, de las Rivas B, Muñoz R. 2015. A Lactobacillus plantarum esterase active on a broad range of phenolic esters. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3235–3242. 10.1128/AEM.00323-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morales F, Morales JI, Hernández CH, Hernández-Sánchez H. 2011. Isolation and partial characterization of halotolerant lactic acid bacteria from two Mexican cheeses. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164:889–905. 10.1007/s12010-011-9182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Morick D, Krasnov BR, Khokhlova IS, Gottlieb Y, Harrus S. 2011. Investigation of Bartonella acquisition and transmission in Xenopsylla ramesis fleas (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). Mol Ecol 20:2864–2870. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alsarraf M, Mohallal EM, Mierzejewska EJ, Behnke-Borowczyk J, Welc-Falęciak R, Bednarska M, Dziewit L, Zalat S, Gilbert F, Behnke JM, Bajer A. 2017. Description of Candidatus Bartonella fadhilae n. sp. and Candidatus Bartonella sanaae n. sp. (Bartonellaceae) from Dipodillus dasyurus and Sekeetamys calurus (Gerbillinae) from the Sinai Massif (Egypt). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 17:483–494. 10.1089/vbz.2016.2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kopecký J, Nesvorná M, Hubert J. 2014. Bartonella-like bacteria carried by domestic mite species. Exp Appl Acarol 64:21–32. 10.1007/s10493-014-9811-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yumoto I, Nakamura A, Iwata H, Kojima K, Kusumoto K, Nodasaka Y, Matsuyama H. 2002. Dietzia psychralcaliphila sp. nov., a novel, facultatively psychrophilic alkaliphile that grows on hydrocarbons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:85–90. 10.1099/00207713-52-1-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li WJ, Chen HH, Zhang YQ, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Xu LH, Jiang CL. 2004. Nesterenkonia halotolerans sp. nov., and Nesterenkonia xinjiangensis sp. nov., actinobacteria from saline soils in the west of China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:837–841. 10.1099/ijs.0.02935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lenahan M, Crowley H, O'Brien SB, Byrne C, Sweeney T, Sheridan JJ. 2009. The potential use of chilling to control the growth of Enterobacteriaceae on porcine carcasses and the incidence of E. coli O157:H7 in pigs. J Appl Microbiol 106:1512–1520. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kozińska A, Paździor E, Pękala A, Niemczuk W. 2014. Acinetobacter johnsonii and Acinetobacter lwoffii—the emerging fish pathogens. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 58:193–199. 10.2478/bvip-2014-0029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shivaji S, Ara S, Prasad S, Manasa BP, Begum Z, Singh A. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Arcticibacter svalbardensis strain MN12-7T, a member of the family Sphingobacteriaceae isolated from an Arctic soil sample. Genome Announc 1:142. 10.1128/genomeA.00484-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yoon JH, Park S, Jung YT. 2013. Mucilaginibacter calamicampi sp. nov., a member of the family Sphingobacteriaceae isolated from soil at a field of reeds. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:37–45. 10.1007/s10482-013-9922-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hetharua B, Min D, Liao H, Guo W, Lin X, Xu H, Tian Y. 2019. Sphingosinithalassobacter portus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Sphingomonadaceae isolated from surface seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2834–2840. 10.1099/ijsem.0.003566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kristyanto S, Chaudhary DK, Kim J. 2018. Stakelama algicida sp. nov., novel algicidal species of the family Sphingomonadaceae isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:317–323. 10.1099/ijsem.0.002506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, Guinee TP. 2004. Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology. Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Galinari É, Nóbrega JED, Andrade NJD, Ferreira C. 2014. Microbiological aspects of the biofilm on wooden utensils used to make a Brazilian artisanal cheese. Braz J Microbiol 45:713–720. 10.1590/s1517-83822014000200047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gaglio R, Alfonzo A, Barbera M, Franciosi E, Francesca N, Moschetti G, Settanni L. 2020. Persistence of a mixed lactic acid bacterial starter culture during lysine fortification of sourdough breads by addition of pistachio powder. Food Microbiol 86:103349. 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Settanni L, Barbaccia P, Bonanno A, Ponte ML, Di Gerlando R, Franciosi E, Di Grigoli A, Gaglio R. 2020. Evolution of indigenous starter microorganisms and physicochemical parameters in spontaneously fermented beef, horse, wild boar and pork salamis produced under controlled conditions. Food Microbiol 87:103385. 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gaglio R, Cirlincione F, Di Miceli G, Franciosi E, Di Gerlando R, Francesca N, Settanni L, Moschetti G. 2020. Microbial dynamics in durum wheat kernels during aging. Int J Food Microbiol 324:108631. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Franciosi E, Settanni L, Cologna N, Cavazza A, Poznanski E. 2011. Microbial analysis of raw cows’ milk used for cheese-making: influence of storage treatments on microbial composition and other technological traits. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:171–180. 10.1007/s11274-010-0443-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gaglio R, Francesca N, Di Gerlando R, Cruciata M, Guarcello R, Portolano B, Moschetti G, Settanni L. 2014. Identification, typing and investigation of the dairy characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from “Vastedda della valle del Belìce” cheeses. Dairy Sci Technol 94:157–180. 10.1007/s13594-013-0150-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cruciata M, Sannino C, Ercolini D, Scatassa ML, De Filippis F, Mancuso I, La Storia A, Moschetti G, Settanni L. 2014. Animal rennets as sources of dairy lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2050–2061. 10.1128/AEM.03837-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dapkevicius MDLE, Sgardioli B, Câmara S, Poeta P, Malcata FX. 2021. Current trends of enterococci in dairy products: a comprehensive review of their multiple roles. Foods 10:821. 10.3390/foods10040821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fugl A, Berhe T, Kiran A, Hussain S, Laursen MF, Bahl MI, Hailu Y, Sørensen KI, Guya ME, Ipsen R, Hansen EB. 2017. Characterisation of lactic acid bacteria in spontaneously fermented camel milk and selection of strains for fermentation of camel milk. Int Dairy J 73:19–24. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Obioha PI, Ouoba LII, Anyogu A, Awamaria B, Atchia S, Ojimelukwe PC, Sutherland JP, Ghoddusi HB. 2021. Identification and characterisation of the lactic acid bacteria associated with the traditional fermentation of dairy fermented product. Braz J Microbiol 52:869–813. 10.1007/s42770-021-00461-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kim MJ, Seo HN, Hwang TS, Lee SH, Park DH. 2008. Characterization of exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by Weissella hellenica SKkimchi3 isolated from kimchi. J Microbiol 46:535–541. 10.1007/s12275-008-0134-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2021. The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J 19:6406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chamba JF, Irlinger F. 2004. Secondary and adjunct cultures, p 191–206. In Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, Guinne TP (ed), Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, 3rd ed, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fleet GH. 1990. Yeasts in dairy products. J Appl Bacteriol 68:199–211. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Galli BD, Martin JGP, da Silva PPM, Porto E, Spoto MHF. 2016. Sensory quality of Camembert-type cheese: relationship between starter cultures and ripening molds. Int J Food Microbiol 234:71–75. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Marcellino N, Benson DR. 2014. The good, the bad, and the ugly: tales of mold-ripened cheese. Microbiol Spectr 1:1–26. 10.1128/microbiolspec.CM-0005-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hymery N, Vasseur V, Coton M, Mounier J, Jany JL, Barbier G, Coton E. 2014. Filamentous fungi and mycotoxins in cheese: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 13:437–456. 10.1111/1541-4337.12069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mallia S, Carpino S, Corralo L, Tuminello L, Gelsonimo R, Licitra G. 2005. Effects of aroma profiles of Piacentinu and Ricotta cheese using different tool materials during cheese making, p 23–34. In Spanier AM, Shahidi F, Parliment TH, Mussinan C, Ho CT, Tratras Contis E (ed), Food flavor and chemistry: explorations into the 21st century. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gaglio R, Cruciata M, Di Gerlando R, Scatassa ML, Cardamone C, Mancuso I, Sardina MT, Moschetti G, Portolano B, Settanni L. 2016. Microbial activation of wooden vats used for traditional cheese production and evolution of the neoformed biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:585–595. 10.1128/AEM.02868-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Minich JJ, Sanders JG, Amir A, Humphrey G, Gilbert JA, Knight R. 2019. Quantifying and understanding well-to-well contamination in microbiome research. mSystems 4:e00186-19. 10.1128/mSystems.00186-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. 2003. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods 55:541–555. 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Claesson MJ, Wang Q, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, Cole JR, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. 2010. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res 38:e200. 10.1093/nar/gkq873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stenlid J, Karlsson JO, Hogberg N. 1994. Intra-specific genetic variation in Heterobasidium annosum revealed by amplification of minisatellite DNA. Mycol Res 98:57–63. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80337-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van den Braak N, Power E, Anthony R, Endtz H, Verbrugh HA, Van Belkum A. 2000. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA versus pulsed field gel electrophoresis of SmaI DNA macrorestriction fragments for typing strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett 192:45–52. 10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00407-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703. 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. 2007. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2259–2261. 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jackson CR, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Barrett JB. 2004. Use of a genus- and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 42:3558–3565. 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3558-3565.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Osek J. 2002. Rapid and specific identification of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli in faeces by multiplex PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:304–310. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES