Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;41(45):9431–9451. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1914-20.2021

Table 2.

Two-way ANOVA Tukey's post hoc multiple comparison analysis for tau + shRNA axonal transport pause frequency data

Comparison Total Anterograde Retrograde
Control shRNA
    WT tau versus P301L tau p < 0.0001 p = 0.0100 p = 0.0109
    WT tau versus R5L tau p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p = 0.0014
    P301L tau versus R5L tau p = 0.8466 p = 0.7316 p = 0.7547
PP1α shRNA
    WT tau versus P301L tau p = 0.0073 p = 0.0450 p = 0.0536
    WT tau versus R5L tau p = 0.0209 p = 0.0058 p = 0.9797
    P301L tau versus R5L tau p = 0.9163 p = 0.7061 p = 0.0821
PP1γ shRNA
    WT tau versus P301L tau p = 0.9457 p = 0.9974 p = 0.7415
    WT tau versus R5L tau p = 0.2491 p = 0.2119 p = 0.5665
    P301L tau versus R5L tau p = 0.1406 p = 0.1875 p = 0.1939

This table includes the adjusted p values for the comparisons between tau expression groups within each shRNA treatment group for axonal transport total and directional pause frequencies. Data (Fig. 7G–I) was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Significance was established at an adjusted p ≤ 0.05.