Table 2.
Comparison | Total | Anterograde | Retrograde |
---|---|---|---|
Control shRNA | |||
WT tau versus P301L tau | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.0100 | p = 0.0109 |
WT tau versus R5L tau | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.0014 |
P301L tau versus R5L tau | p = 0.8466 | p = 0.7316 | p = 0.7547 |
PP1α shRNA | |||
WT tau versus P301L tau | p = 0.0073 | p = 0.0450 | p = 0.0536 |
WT tau versus R5L tau | p = 0.0209 | p = 0.0058 | p = 0.9797 |
P301L tau versus R5L tau | p = 0.9163 | p = 0.7061 | p = 0.0821 |
PP1γ shRNA | |||
WT tau versus P301L tau | p = 0.9457 | p = 0.9974 | p = 0.7415 |
WT tau versus R5L tau | p = 0.2491 | p = 0.2119 | p = 0.5665 |
P301L tau versus R5L tau | p = 0.1406 | p = 0.1875 | p = 0.1939 |
This table includes the adjusted p values for the comparisons between tau expression groups within each shRNA treatment group for axonal transport total and directional pause frequencies. Data (Fig. 7G–I) was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Significance was established at an adjusted p ≤ 0.05.