Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 23;50(5):1639–1650. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa266

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Causal structures that were assessed in the simulation study.Z: genetic instrument; W: covariable; R: possible direct consequence of Z; X: exposure; Y: outcome: U: unmeasured common cause. Rows represent different causal structures between Z, X, W and Y as illustrated by Scenarios A (W fully mediates the effect of Z on X), B (Z independently affects both X and W), C (X fully mediates the effect of Z on W), D (effect of Z on X and W is mediated by a common cause R), E (same as B except that W has a direct effect on Y) and F (same as D except that W has a direct effect on Y). Columns represent different confounding structures between X, W and Y as illustrated by Scenarios A1-F1 (no unmeasured confounders other than R), A2-F2 (presence of X-W confounder: UX,W), A3-F3 (presence of W-Y confounder: UW,Y), A4-F4 (presence of X-Y confounder UX,Y) and A5-F5 (presence of all three confounders simultaneously)