Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Psychol Assess. 2021 Jan 19;36(6):981–997. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000624

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) An example dataset consisting of raw observations for two individuals (Panel 1), with predicted locations (Panel 2) and log variances (Panel 3) from the MELSM. (B) A scatter plot of PA and Day for one subject. The gray line is the person’s mean. (C) Illustration of Savage-Dickey Bayes Factors for correlations when H0 is supported (Green) and when H1 is supported (Pink). The dotted line is the implied prior for correlations using the matrix-F distribution. The dashed line is a posterior distribution that favors the null hypothesis (BF01 ≈ 5.69), whereas the solid line is a posterior distribution that supports the alternative hypothesis (BF10 ≈ 15.40). (D) The interaction between mean number of steps and the deviation from the mean on PA. The effect of daily activity on PA is greater for those with less average activity.