Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;2021:2292907. doi: 10.1155/2021/2292907

Table 2.

Results of quality assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for case-control studies.

First author, year Selection Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis Exposure
Adequate definition of cases Representativeness of the cases Selection of controls Definition of controls Ascertainment of exposure Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls Nonresponse rate Scores
Li, 2018 [18] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Cheng et al., 2018 [19] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Shao et al., 2019 [20] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Liu et al., 2020 [21] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Zhang and Shi, 2020 [22] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Zhang and Xiong, 2019 [23] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8
Zhao, 2018 [24] ☆ ☆   ☆ ☆☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 8

☆: study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and exposure categories; ☆☆: a maximum of two stars can be given for comparability.