Table 2.
Results of quality assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for case-control studies.
| First author, year | Selection | Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis | Exposure | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adequate definition of cases | Representativeness of the cases | Selection of controls | Definition of controls | Ascertainment of exposure | Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Nonresponse rate | Scores | ||
| Li, 2018 [18] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Cheng et al., 2018 [19] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Shao et al., 2019 [20] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Liu et al., 2020 [21] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Zhang and Shi, 2020 [22] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Zhang and Xiong, 2019 [23] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
| Zhao, 2018 [24] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 | |
☆: study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and exposure categories; ☆☆: a maximum of two stars can be given for comparability.