Table 4.
Comparison of Reevaluation Method of Medical Technology in Japan and Korea.
| Reevaluation | South Korea | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| CED-driven | Reevaluation for CSB: | Reevaluation for CA: |
| • Consider four components | • The process for reevaluation after granting CA eligibility is similar to that of C1 category application regardless of initial application categories | |
| -Clinical usefulness | ||
| -Cost-effectiveness | ||
| -Replaceability | ||
| -Social demand on reimbursement | ||
| Non-CED-driven | Functional category reevaluation: | Not available |
| • Review cost, effectiveness, and performance of listed items | ||
| • Adjust reimbursement price with the weighted average by applying claim volumes and prices |
CED, coverage with evidence development; CA, challenge application; CSB, conditional selective benefit