Table 5.
The Comparison of Challenge Application (CA) and Conditional Selective Benefit (CSB).
| Category | CA in Japan | CSB in South Korea |
|---|---|---|
| Authority in charge | MHLW | MoHW/HIRA |
| Applicant | Manufacturers | MoHW/HIRA |
| Target of evaluation | STMs | New procedures and medical technologies |
| Responsibility of evidence generation (data collection) | Manufacturers | Healthcare providers |
| Reevaluation period | Depending on protocol* | Designated by the MoHW/HIRA (usually 3-5 years)** |
| Patient financial burden (patient copayment) | Relatively low (e.g., 30%) | High (e.g., 80% patient copayment rates) |
| Expected administrative measures after reevaluation | Create new functional category and premium pricing | Relieve patient copayment rates or reduced prices |
MHLW, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; MoHW, Ministry of Health and Welfare; HIRA, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; STMs, Special Treatment Materials
*Although reevaluation period varies depending on protocol, periodic report on CA program is needed to be submitted at least every 2 years.
**According to the administration rule (standard for designation and implementation etc. of Selective Benefit), the designated period is determined a year after the designation of CSB.