Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 13;4(4):311–320. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0011

Table 5.

The Comparison of Challenge Application (CA) and Conditional Selective Benefit (CSB).

Category CA in Japan CSB in South Korea
Authority in charge MHLW MoHW/HIRA
Applicant Manufacturers MoHW/HIRA
Target of evaluation STMs New procedures and medical technologies
Responsibility of evidence generation (data collection) Manufacturers Healthcare providers
Reevaluation period Depending on protocol* Designated by the MoHW/HIRA (usually 3-5 years)**
Patient financial burden (patient copayment) Relatively low (e.g., 30%) High (e.g., 80% patient copayment rates)
Expected administrative measures after reevaluation Create new functional category and premium pricing Relieve patient copayment rates or reduced prices

MHLW, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; MoHW, Ministry of Health and Welfare; HIRA, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; STMs, Special Treatment Materials

*Although reevaluation period varies depending on protocol, periodic report on CA program is needed to be submitted at least every 2 years.

**According to the administration rule (standard for designation and implementation etc. of Selective Benefit), the designated period is determined a year after the designation of CSB.