Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 13;50(12):2394–2411. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01493-1

Table 3.

Model fit comparisons for the latent growth curve analyses of science identity by racial/ethnic group from 9th grade to 3 years post-HS

Black students’ science identity
Model χ2 df p Δ χ2 Δdf p RMSEA 90% CI CFI TLI SRMR
No growth 138.47 6 <0.001 0.10 0.09; 0.12 0.38 0.69 0.14
Linear* 21.34 3 <0.001 117.14 3 <0.001 0.05 0.03; 0.08 0.91 0.91 0.04
Latinx students’ science identity
No growth 171.17 6 <0.001 0.09 0.08; 0.10 0.55 0.78 0.13
Linear* 25.96 3 <0.001 145.21 3 <0.001 0.05 0.03; 0.07 0.94 0.94 0.05
Asian students’ science identity
No growth 45.75 6 <0.001 0.06 0.05; 0.08 0.75 0.88 0.10
Linear* 15.05 3 0.002 30.70 3 <0.001 0.05 0.03; 0.07 0.93 0.93 0.09
White students’ science identity
No growth 718.35 6 <0.001 0.10 0.10; 0.11 0.65 0.83 0.10
Linear* 153.56 3 <0.001 564.79 3 <0.001 0.07 0.06; 0.07 0.93 0.93 0.05

Note. *Indicates the model with the better fit indices

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09), Base Year, First Year Follow-Up, Second Year Follow-Up