Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 15;25(22):10430–10440. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16971

TABLE 2.

Comparison of behavioural function test among the four groups in subchronic general toxicity study

Parameters 0 cells/head 1 × 104 cells/head 3 × 104 cells/head 1 × 105 cells/head
Sex: Male
Negative geotaxis 10.10 ± 0.32 10.20 ± 0.42 10.00 ± 0.00 10.00 ± 0.00
Traction test 15.30 ± 0.48 15.80 ± 1.03 15.70 ± 0.95 16.00 ± 0.94
Pupillary reflex 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00
Acoustic startle response 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00
Rotating rod test 23.50 ± 0.71 23.60 ± 0.84 23.30 ± 0.67 23.60 ± 0.70
Sex: Female
Negative geotaxis 10.10 ± 0.32 10.00 ± 0.00 10.00 ± 0.00 10.20 ± 0.42
Traction test 16.30 ± 1.64 15.80 ± 1.32 16.00 ± 1.33 15.70 ± 0.82
Pupillary reflex 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00
Acoustic startle response 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00 22.00 ± 0.00
Rotating rod test 23.30 ± 0.48 23.20 ± 0.42 23.60 ± 0.70 24.10 ± 0.74

Values are post‐natal day (PND) mean ± standard error of 10 rats/sex/group. The evaluation of negative geotaxis, traction test, acoustic startle response, pupillary reflex and rotating rod test began on PND 10, PND 15, PND 22 and PND 22, respectively.