Table 2.
Univariate logistic regression analysis on the associations between the studied background variables and internet gaming disorder (N=3081).
| Background variables | IGDa, n (%) | Association, ORcb (95% CI) | ||
| Sex | ||||
|
|
Femalec | 119 (7.8) | N/Ad | |
|
|
Male | 297 (19.16) | 2.80 (2.23-3.51)*** | |
| Grade | ||||
|
|
Sevenc | 226 (11.42) | N/A | |
|
|
Eight | 114 (19.69) | 1.90 (1.49-2.44)*** | |
|
|
Nine | 78 (14.91) | 1.36 (1.03-1.80)* | |
| Study site | ||||
|
|
Guangzhouc | 96 (8.53) | N/A | |
|
|
Chengdu | 322 (16.47) | 2.12 (1.66-2.69)*** | |
| Born in the city where the study was conductede | ||||
|
|
Yesc | 308 (13.01) | N/A | |
|
|
No | 105 (15.2) | 1.20 (0.94-1.52) | |
| Living with both parentse | ||||
|
|
Yesc | 294 (12.34) |
|
|
|
|
No | 114 (17.84) | 1.54 (1.22-1.95)*** | |
| Father’s educational levele | ||||
|
|
Junior middle school or belowc | 227 (15.25) | N/A | |
|
|
Senior middle school or equal | 109 (13.12) | 0.84 (0.66-1.07) | |
|
|
College or above | 52 (8.75) | 0.53 (0.39-0.73)*** | |
| Mother’s educational levele | ||||
|
|
Junior middle school or belowc | 218 (14.23) | N/A | |
|
|
Senior middle school or equal | 102 (12.7) | 0.88 (0.68-1.13) | |
|
|
College or above | 60 (10.6) | 0.72 (0.53-0.97)* | |
| Household income level when compared with classmatese | ||||
|
|
Much higher/higherc | 87 (12.95) | N/A | |
|
|
Moderate | 246 (12.29) | 0.94 (0.73-1.22) | |
|
|
Lower/much lower | 76 (19.64) | 1.64 (1.17-2.30)** | |
| Self-reported academic performancee | ||||
|
|
Above averagec | 98 (9.61) | N/A | |
|
|
Average | 169 (12.54) | 1.35 (1.04-1.76)* | |
|
|
Below average | 127 (21.17) | 2.53 (1.90-3.36)*** | |
aIGD: internet gaming disorder.
bORc: crude odds ratio.
cReference=1.0
dN/A: not applicable.
eMissing data were excluded from the analysis.
*P<.05.
**P<.01.
***P<.001.