Table 9.
Efficacy comparisons between strain categories. The efficacy was tested using linear mixed modeling (β coefficient was not standardized).
| Strain categories | Estimate (SE) | t testb (df) | P value |
| Balanced hybrid versus CBDa | 0.387332 (0.125752) | 3.080 (167.3) | .03 |
| Indica versus balanced hybrid | 0.200067 (0.107863) | 1.855 (208.6) | .98 |
| Indica hybrid versus balanced hybrid | 0.127900 (0.104839) | 1.220 (128.9) | .99 |
| Balanced hybrid versus sativa | 0.544414 (0.170767) | 3.188 (72.0) | .03 |
| Sativa hybrid versus balanced hybrid | 0.008790 (0.181109) | 0.049 (75.1) | .99 |
| Indica versus CBD | 0.587400 (0.114173) | 5.145 (216.2) | <.001 |
| Indica hybrid versus CBD | 0.515232 (0.115805) | 4.450 (197.1) | <.001 |
| CBD versus sativa | 0.157082 (0.163729) | 0.959 (58.6) | .99 |
| Sativa hybrid versus CBD | 0.396122 (0.181141) | 2.187 (82.9) | .48 |
| Indica versus indica hybrid | 0.072168 (0.083424) | 0.865 (183.5) | .99 |
| Indica versus sativa | 0.744481 (0.159664) | 4.663 (69.6) | <.001 |
| Indica versus sativa hybrid | 0.191277 (0.162713) | 1.176 (68.4) | .99 |
| Indica hybrid versus sativa | 0.672314 (0.164905) | 4.077 (73.6) | <.001 |
| Indica hybrid versus sativa hybrid | 0.119110 (0.166813) | 0.714 (82.5) | .99 |
| Sativa hybrid versus sativa | 0.553204 (0.201776) | 2.742 (65.5) | .12 |
aCBD: cannabidiol.
bTests were two-tailed.