Table 2.
Comparison of efficacy [n (%)]
| Group | Number of cases | Excellent | Good | Poor | Response rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIN group | 13 | 10 (76.92) | 3 (23.08) | 0 (0.00) | 13 (100.00) |
| PO group | 25 | 10 (40.00) | 8 (32.00) | 7 (28.00) | 18 (72.00) |
| X2 | - | - | - | - | 4.462 |
| P | - | - | - | - | 0.035 |
Comparison of efficacy [n (%)]
| Group | Number of cases | Excellent | Good | Poor | Response rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIN group | 13 | 10 (76.92) | 3 (23.08) | 0 (0.00) | 13 (100.00) |
| PO group | 25 | 10 (40.00) | 8 (32.00) | 7 (28.00) | 18 (72.00) |
| X2 | - | - | - | - | 4.462 |
| P | - | - | - | - | 0.035 |