Table 6. Comparison of Optimization Results of Case 3.
| source | method | TAC/$·year–1 | units |
|---|---|---|---|
| existing plant | 8.856 × 106 | 18 | |
| Khorasany and Fesanghary23a | HS/SQP | 7.436 × 106 | 18 |
| Zhaoyi et al.24 | GA/PSO | 7.386 × 106 | 17 |
| Zhaoyi et al.24a | GA/PSO | 7.361 × 106 | 16 |
| Pavão et al.9 | SA/PSO | 7.301 × 106 | 17 |
| Chang et al.4a | MSTR | 7.030 × 106 | 17 |
| this work | CLPSO | 7.276 × 106 | 19 |
HENs with splits.