Table 2.
Results of GAMLSS-BEZI and Random Effects Meta-analysis across included studies at the family level
| Bacterial family | Estimate | SE | Lower limit | Upper limit | p-value | Study | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | AF & EU | ||||||
| Corynebacteriaceae | -0.17 | 0.08 | -0.34 | -0.01 | 0.0389 | Study 2 | IL |
| -0.35 | 0.35 | -1.03 | 0.34 | 0.3182 | Study 3 | IT 1 | |
| -0.54 | 0.39 | -1.32 | 0.23 | 0.1723 | Study 4 | IT 2 | |
| -0.13 | 0.37 | -0.86 | 0.59 | 0.7210 | Study 5 | RU | |
| -0.19 | 0.08 | -0.35 | -0.04 | 0.0124 | Meta_analysis | Pooled | |
| Study 1 | AF & EU | ||||||
| Halomonadaceae | -0.25 | 0.11 | -0.46 | -0.04 | 0.0180 | Study 2 | IL |
| Study 3 | IT 1 | ||||||
| Study 4 | IT 2 | ||||||
| -0.14 | 0.29 | -0.72 | 0.43 | 0.6279 | Study 5 | RU | |
| -0.24 | 0.10 | -0.44 | -0.04 | 0.0165 | Meta_analysis | Pooled |
AF & EU: Africa & Europe; IL: Israel; IT: Italy; RU: Russia