Table 3.
Characteristic | Worthwhile 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Not worthwhile 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
All respondents (%) | |||||
| |||||
20 | 26 | 35 | 9 | 9 | |
| |||||
Sex | |||||
Male | 18 | 27 | 34 | 11 | 10 |
Female | 21 | 26 | 36 | 8 | 9 |
| |||||
Age (years) | |||||
18–39b | 19 | 36 | 33 | 10 | 2 |
40–64 | 20 | 26 | 36 | 10 | 8 |
≥65b | 20 | 19 | 35 | 6 | 20 |
| |||||
Education (n = 543)c | |||||
Low | 26 | 16 | 33 | 4 | 21 |
Intermediate | 21 | 23 | 39 | 9 | 7 |
High | 14 | 36 | 31 | 12 | 7 |
Percentages have been rounded.
Low = none, primary school, or pre-vocational education. Intermediate = secondary or vocational education. High = professional higher or university.
Significance (p <. 01, Tukey post-hoc test) between age groups.