Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Dyn. 2019 Sep 10;248(12):1195–1210. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.106

Table 2.

Rescue of cardiac fusion by expression of tmem2 and variants

Genotype Injected mRNA Not fused Ring Tube
Mtmem2 uninjected - - 38/38 (100%)
MZtmem2 uninjected 35/35 (100%) - -
Mtmem2 tmem2 - - 28/28 (100%)
MZtmem2 tmem2 3/32 (9%) 8/32 (25%) 21/32 (66%)
Mtmem2 htrc-tmem2 - - 47/47 (100%)
MZtmem2 htrc-tmem2 5/41 (12%) 11/41 (27%) 25/41 (61%)
Mtmem2 sc-tmem2 - - 34/34 (100%)
MZtmem2 sc-tmem2 9/28 (32%) 17/28 (61%) 2/28 (7%)
Mtmem2 ΔC-term - - 15/15 (100%)
MZtmem2 ΔC-term 16/17 (94%) 1/17 (6%) -
Mtmem2 ΔG8 - - 37/37 (100%)
MZtmem2 ΔG8 31/31 (100%) - -
Mtmem2 ΔPLT - - 27/27 (100%)
MZtmem2 ΔPLT 31/31 (100%) - -
Mtmem2 ΔPbH1 - - 36/36 (100%)
MZtmem2 ΔPbH1 36/36 (100%) - -
Mtmem2 ΔPL - - 42/42 (100%)
MZtmem2 ΔPL 29/29 (100%) - -
Mtmem2 R267H - - 54/54 (100%)
MZtmem2 R267H - 19/53 (36%) 34/53 (64%)

Summary of experiments evaluating whether expression of tmem2 or tmem2 variants can rescue the cardiac fusion defects in MZtmem2 mutants. Embryos displaying distinct bilateral populations of cardiomyocytes (as in Fig. 4B,J) or two groups of cardiomyocytes joined only at the posterior (as in Fig. 4C) were categorized as “not fused”. Embryos displaying a fused ring of cardiomyocytes, but not a heart tube, were categorized as “ring” (as in Fig. 4E). Embryos displaying a heart tube were categorized as “tube” (as in Fig. 4A,D,F,G,H,I). Data indicate the fraction of embryos in each category for injected Mtmem2 and MZtmem2 embryos. Full-length tmem2, sc-tmem2, htrc-tmem2, and R267H can rescue cardiac fusion in MZtmem2 mutants, while expression of tmem2 or tmem2 variants does not disrupt cardiac fusion in Mtmem2 siblings. Significant differences in the phenotypes seen in MZtmem2 mutants were determined using Fisher’s exact test: uninjected vs. tmem2, p<0.001; uninjected vs. htrc-tmem2, p<0.001; uninjected vs. sc-tmem2, p<0.001; uninjected vs. R267H, p<0.001; tmem2 vs. sc-tmem2, p<0.001; htrc-tmem2 vs. sc-tmem2, p<0.001. Other analyses with Fisher’s exact test did not yield significant differences: tmem2 vs. htrc-tmem2, p>0.1; tmem2 vs. R267H, p>0.01.