Table 3. Comparison of reported support metrics for focal nodes from dissorophid-focused analyses.

Clade	S12	MFEM13	L18	D20 (A)	This study (A)	D20 (W)	this study (W)
Olsoniformes	3/100	NR/91	NR	>3/90	>3/75	4/94	4/77
Trematopidae	2/77	NR/84	NR	>3/98	2/61	4/95	3/63
Dissorophidae	3/93	NR/82	3/NR	3/86	2/53	3/90	3/58
Cacopinae	3/98	–	3/NR	1/54	–	2/70	1/39
Cacops	–	–	1/NR	1/71	1/41	1/73	2/46
Dissorophinae	1/76	NR/72	3/NR	–	–	1/71	1/50
Post-Platyhystrix	1/60	NR/69	1/NR	1/51	1/32	1/71	2/53
Post-Aspidosaurus	1/<50	NR	–	1/45	–	2/72	1/52

Note:

All nodes are from strict consensus trees except for Schoch (2012). Abbreviations refer to publications: S12, Schoch (2012); MFEM13, Maddin et al. (2013); L18, Liu (2018); D20, Dilkes (2020). ‘A’ and ‘W’ refer to the taxon samples employed by Dilkes: all taxa (A) and without wildcards (W). The same sublettering is used for this study (Analysis 7). An en-dash indicates that a node was not recovered, and ‘NR’ means that the value was not reported. Because the composition of Cacopinae and Dissorophinae sometimes includes certain wildcard taxa (e.g., Conjunctio multidens) or do not include longstanding nominal members, these nodes are restricted in this specific comparison to the same stable constituent taxa in this table. Cacopinae is comprised of Cacops + Anakamacops + Kamacops + Zygosaurus; and Dissorophinae is comprised of Broiliellus + Diploseira + Dissorophus. Bremer decay indices are listed before the forward slash, and bootstrap values are listed after the forward slash.