Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;13(21):5449. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215449

Table 1.

The recruitment strategies, numbers of subjects approached, numbers of respondents and the percentage of respondents randomised in major European lung cancer screening trials.

Lung Cancer Screening Trial Recruitment Period Number of Subjects Approached Number of Subjects That Responded Approach Response Rate Number of Eligible Subjects That Consented % of Respondents Randomised Method of Recruitment
NELSON [6] 2003–2006 606,409 150,920 24.9% 15,822 10.5% Direct mail
ITALUNG [22] 2004–2006 71,232 17,055 23.9% 3206 18.8% Direct mail
LUSI [23] 2007–2011 292,440 95,797 32.8% 4052 4.2% Direct mail and mass media
NLST [18] 2002–2004 n/a 53,454 n/a 52,486 n/a Direct mail, mass media and outreach
UKLS [8] 2011–2014 247,354 98,746 39.9% 4061 4.1% Direct mail
LSUT [24] 2015–2017 2012 1058 52.6% 770 72.8% Direct mail
LHC Manchester [25] 2016–2018 16,402 2827 17.2% 1384 49.0% Searched GP records to send direct mail invitations
LHC Liverpool [26] 2016–2018 11,526 4566 39.6% 1318 28.9% Searched GP records to send direct mail invitations
ECLS [9] 2013–2016 77,077 18,657 24.2% 12,209 65.4% Searched GP records to send direct mail invitations, mass media and outreach