Table 2.
Frequency distribution of athlete influential persons during RWL.
| Source of Influence | Group | Not Influential | Little Influential | Unsure | Somehow Influential | Very Influential | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teammate | Seniors | 9 (37.5%) | 6 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (25%) | 3 (12.5%) | 2.75 | 0.6 |
| Juniors | 6 (26.1%) | 7 (30.4%) | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (13%) | |||
| Fellow sambist | Seniors | 13 (54.2%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (20.8%) | 4 (16.7%) | 2 (8.3%) | 11.5 | 0.02 * |
| Juniors | 9 (39.1%) | 8 (34.8%) | 1 (4.3%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (8.7%) | |||
| Physician | Seniors | 12 (50%) | 8 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.2%) | 3 (12.5%) | 6.03 | 0.3 |
| Juniors | 16 (69.6%) | 3 (13%) | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8.7%) | |||
| Personal trainer | Seniors | 10 (41.7%) | 3 (12.5%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (33.3%) | 5 (20.8%) | 6.4 | 0.27 |
| Juniors | 8 (34.8%) | 3 (13%) | 3 (13%) | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (13%) | |||
| Coach | Seniors | 3 (12.5%) | 2 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (45.8%) | 7 (29.2%) | 5.02 | 0.29 |
| Juniors | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (21.7%) | 8 (34.8%) | |||
| Parents | Seniors | 9 (37.5%) | 3 (12.5%) | 2 (8.3%) | 4 (16.7%) | 5 (20.8%) | 2.17 | 0.83 |
| Juniors | 7 (30.4%) | 5 (21.7%) | 1 (4.3%) | 5 (21.7%) | 5 (21.7%) | |||
| Dietitian | Seniors | 15 (62.5%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | 3 (12.5%) | 3.31 | 0.51 |
| Juniors | 17 (73.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8.7%) | 3 (13%) | 1 (4.3%) |
Legend: χ2—chi-square test; p—probability; *—significant.