Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111578

Table 2.

Results of differentiated validity test and common method bias analysis.

Model χ2 df χ2/df CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR
One-factor model: I1+ I2+ I3+ D1+ D2+ D3 2000.69 275 7.28 0.55 0.51 0.13 0.12
Two-factor model: I1; I2+ I3+ D1+ D2+ D3 1453.54 274 5.30 0.69 0.66 0.11 0.09
Three-factor model: I1; I2; I3+ D1+ D2+ D3 1291.87 272 4.75 0.73 0.71 0.10 0.08
Four-factor model: I1; I2; I3; D1+ D2+ D3 620.75 269 2.31 0.91 0.90 0.06 0.05
Five-factor model: I1; I2; I3; D1; D2+ D3 542.74 265 2.05 0.93 0.92 0.05 0.05
Six-factor model: I1; I2; I3; D1; D2; D3 334.47 256 1.31 0.98 0.98 0.03 0.04

Note: N = 369; I1, work-based social media use; I2, work interruptions; I3, work engagement; D1, job dedication; D2, interpersonal facilitation; D3, task performance; “+” represents two factors combined into one factor.