Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;18(21):11137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111137

Table A5.

Mean SDQ scores over time for families originating from Iran or Afghanistan by intervention or waitlist/control group. (Higher scores indicating higher levels of difficulties on all subscales and the Total Difficulty Scale, except for the prosocial scale where higher scores indicate fewer difficulties in prosocial behaviour).

SDQ Pre-TestMean (SD) Post-Test Mean (SD) Follow-up Mean (SD) Two-Way Mixed ANOVA F(dftime, dferror); p-Value; Partial η2 Repeated Measures ANOVA F(dftime, dferror); p-Value; Partial η2 Post-Hoc Tests
Emotional problem scale [0–10]
Iran Intervention (n = 50) 3.48
(2.36)
2.90
(2.38)
2.60
(2.45)
F(1.778,131.587) = 1.627; p = 0.203; partial η2 = 0.022 F(1.800,88.177) = 6.155; p = 0.004; partial η2 = 0.112
Waitlist/Control (n = 26) 2.46
(1.92)
2.62
(2.08)
2.19
(2.14)
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 54) 5.04
(2.15)
5.02
(2.64)
4.83
(2.78)
F(2,162) = 0.997; p = 0.371; partial η2 = 0.012
Waitlist/Control (n = 29) 5.45
(2.59)
4.62
(1.72)
4.86
(2.25)
Conduct problem scale [0–10]
Iran Intervention (n = 60) 2.52
(1.81)
2.03
(1.71)
2.13
(1.66)
F(1.859,154.312) = 1.799; p = 0.171; partial η2 = 0.021 F(2,118) = 3.877; p = 0.023; partial η2 = 0.062
Waitlist/Control (n = 25) 2.20
(1.55)
2.24
(1.48)
2.40
(1.80)
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 54) 3.33
(2.03)
2.65
(1.81)
2.46
(1.59)
F(2,162) = 1.158; p = 0.317; partial η2 = 0.014 F(2,106) = 9.920; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.158 ✱■
Waitlist/Control (n = 29) 3.21
(1.72)
2.38
(1.45)
1.83
(1.67)
F(2,56) = 12.892; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.315 ✱■
Hyperactivity scale [0–10]
Iran Intervention (n = 61) 3.72
(2.10)
3.41
(2.21)
3.31
(2.05)
F(2,170) = 1.247; p = 0.290; partial η2 = 0.014
Waitlist/Control (n = 26) 3.88
(2.23)
3.88
(2.36)
3.19
(1.88)
F(2,50) = 3.729; p = 0.031; partial η2 = 0.130
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 57) 4.49
(2.32)
3.98
(2.45)
3.82
(2.33)
F(2,168) = 1.736; p = 0.179; partial η2 = 0.020 F(2,112) = 3.833; p = 0.031; partial η2 = 0.064
Waitlist/Control (n = 29) 5.21
(2.30)
4.34
(2.21)
3.66
(2.27)
F(2,56) = 5.880; p = 0.005; partial η2 = 0.174
Peer problem scale [0–0]
Iran Intervention (n = 62) 2.71
(1.61)
2.60
(1.48)
2.21
(1.57)
F(2,166) = 1.146; p = 0.320; partial η2 = 0.014 F(2,122) = 4.259; p = 0.016; partial η2 = 0.065
Waitlist/Control (n = 23) 1.91
(1.53)
2.09
(1.47)
1.91
(1.08)
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 58) 3.40
(1.73)
2.83
(1.87)
2.66
(1.78)
F(2,170) = 1.197; p = 0.564; partial η2 = 0.007 F(2,114) = 4.081; p = 0.019; partial η2 = 0.067
Waitlist/Control (n = 29) 3.14
(1.73)
3.00
(1.81)
2.83
(2.02)
Prosocial scale [0–10]
Iran Intervention (n = 62) 7.63
(2.15)
8.06
(1.73)
7.89
(1.89)
F(2,168) = 2.216; p = 0.112; partial η2 = 0.026
Waitlist/Control (n = 24) 8.42
(1.53)
8.04
(1.71)
8.21
(2.02)
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 57) 7.51
(1.83)
7.61
(2.02)
8.68
(1.35)
F(2,168) = 0.245; p = 0.783; partial η2 = 0.003 F(2,112) = 14.801; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.209 ⦿■
Waitlist/Control (n = 29) 7.34
(2.16)
7.14
(1.99)
8.38
(1.80)
F(2,56) = 5.168; p = 0.009; partial η2 = 0.156 ⦿
Total difficulty scale [0–40]
Iran Intervention (n = 42) 12.10
(5.37)
10.60
(5.38)
9.43
(5.71)
F(1.876,116.301) = 2.939; p = 0.060; partial η2 = 0.045 F(2,82) = 11.428; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.218 ✱⦿■
Waitlist/Control (n = 22) 10.55
(5.67)
10.86
(5.58)
10.05
(5.23)
Afghanistan Intervention (n = 50) 16.28
(6.00)
14.54
(6.16)
13.60
(6.52)
F(2,146) = 0.237; p = 0.790; partial η2 = 0.003 F(2,98) = 9.765; p < 0.001; partial η2 = 0.166 ✱■
Waitlist/Control (n = 25) 16.52
(4.82)
14.36
(4.91)
13.00
(5.70)
F(2,48) = 4.262; p = 0.020; partial η2 = 0.151

Results for repeated measure ANOVAs and post-hoc tests only shown if significant; SD: standard deviation; ✱ significant difference between t1 and t2, ⦿ significant difference between t2 and t3, ■ significant difference between t1 and t3.