Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 7;18(21):11702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111702

Table 8.

Results of multinomial probit regression analysis regarding younger females’ vaccine hesitancy.

Dependent Variable: Vaccine Hesitancy Female: Age < 35 Female: Age 35–49 Female: Age 50–64
Age 1.937 *** 2.834 *** 3.492 ***
(0.300) (0.197) (0.404)
Age squared −0.035 *** −0.034 *** −0.031 ***
(0.005) (0.002) (0.004)
Spouse −0.572 *** −0.037 0.200
(0.255) (0.232) (0.273)
Children 0.062 −0.319 * −0.372 *
(0.210) (0.171) (0.209)
Living alone −0.254 0.024 −0.004
(0.264) (0.247) (0.307)
Living in central area −0.152 0.182 −0.124
(0.168) (0.149) (0.186)
University degree −0.406 ** −0.065 0.098
(0.186) (0.159) (0.189)
Employed −0.269 −0.233 0.141
(0.197) (0.173) (0.214)
Log of household income −0.006 0.004 −0.288 **
(0.145) (0.122) (0.140)
Log of household assets 0.033 −0.022 −0.033
(0.086) (0.065) (0.076)
Financial literacy −0.051 −0.167 0.094
(0.251) (0.214) (0.263)
Subjective health status −0.209 *** −0.279 *** −0.189 **
(0.076) (0.069) (0.085)
Anxiety about the future −0.134 * −0.115 −0.027
(0.079) (0.071) (0.080)
Myopic view of the future −0.061 0.017 0.126
(0.084) (0.077) (0.090)
Level of risk preference 0.122 0.309 −0.024
(0.401) (0.351) (0.451)
Constant 24.600 *** −56.740 *** −92.480 ***
(5.023) (4.387) (11.060)
Observations 1344 1344 1344
Log pseudolikelihood −920.020 −920.020 −920.020
Wald chi2 560.2 560.2 560.2
p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00

Notes: Base outcome: vaccine non-hesitancy among younger females. Robust standard errors are in parentheses; *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1.