Table 2.
Differences by teacher gender and age for the study variables.
Statement | Gender | Age | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t (df = 172) | p-Value | d | F (df = 3) | p-Value | ƞp2 | |
1. It has meant more dedication than the face-to-face | 0.81 | 0.421 | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.742 | 0.01 |
2. Teamwork and the coordination with other teachers have helped me | 0.08 | 0.936 | 0.02 | 2.31 | 0.078 | 0.04 |
3. Improves student’s autonomy | 0.94 | 0.351 | 0.14 | 1.20 | 0.313 | 0.03 |
4. Improves the students’ use of new technologies | 1.02 | 0.309 | 0.16 | 2.82 | 0.062 | 0.07 |
5. Increases student’s motivation | 0.10 | 0.924 | 0.02 | 0.84 | 0.475 | 0.02 |
6. Allows a more individualized teaching-learning process | 1.07 | 0.285 | 0.16 | 1.05 | 0.376 | 0.03 |
7. Facilitates involving families in the teaching-learning process | 1.14 | 0.256 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.731 | 0.01 |
8. The lack of technological means in the students is a limitation | 1.06 | 0.311 | 0.16 | 1.80 | 0.148 | 0.05 |
9. The lack of knowledge in the use of information and communication technologies by students is a limitation | 1.05 | 0.298 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 0.420 | 0.03 |
10. It is more difficult to establish a relationship of trust with the student | 0.57 | 0.571 | 0.09 | 0.90 | 0.446 | 0.02 |
11. Socio-affective relationships among students have worsened | 1.38 | 0.168 | 0.16 | 0.78 | 0.509 | 0.02 |