Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 24;18(21):11146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111146

Table 2.

Differences by teacher gender and age for the study variables.

Statement Gender Age
t (df = 172) p-Value d F (df = 3) p-Value ƞp2
1. It has meant more dedication than the face-to-face 0.81 0.421 0.14 0.41 0.742 0.01
2. Teamwork and the coordination with other teachers have helped me 0.08 0.936 0.02 2.31 0.078 0.04
3. Improves student’s autonomy 0.94 0.351 0.14 1.20 0.313 0.03
4. Improves the students’ use of new technologies 1.02 0.309 0.16 2.82 0.062 0.07
5. Increases student’s motivation 0.10 0.924 0.02 0.84 0.475 0.02
6. Allows a more individualized teaching-learning process 1.07 0.285 0.16 1.05 0.376 0.03
7. Facilitates involving families in the teaching-learning process 1.14 0.256 0.17 0.43 0.731 0.01
8. The lack of technological means in the students is a limitation 1.06 0.311 0.16 1.80 0.148 0.05
9. The lack of knowledge in the use of information and communication technologies by students is a limitation 1.05 0.298 0.16 0.95 0.420 0.03
10. It is more difficult to establish a relationship of trust with the student 0.57 0.571 0.09 0.90 0.446 0.02
11. Socio-affective relationships among students have worsened 1.38 0.168 0.16 0.78 0.509 0.02