Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111250

Table 2.

Survey responses from scenario enactment participants and hospital design stakeholders. On a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents were asked: “This evaluation method would allow me to provide accurate feedback regarding”.

Evaluation Objectives Average Participant
Response
Average Stakeholder Response
Unit configuration 4.77 4.40
Room size 4.14 3.88
Design or design feature comparisons (e.g., compare room layouts) 4.64 4.56
Space requirements for equipment or processes 3.93 4.38
Access to the patient and/or equipment 4.29 4.25
Patient/family spaces and experiences 4.00 4.07
Patient transport routes to and from the room 3.50 4.25
Room configuration 4.64 4.56
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment placement 4.43 4.63
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment usability 4.36 4.25
Visibility of patient, monitors, supplies, and/or equipment 4.07 4.67
Supply placement 4.50 4.60
Adverse events 4.08 4.14
Work flows and processes 4.64 4.20
Team functioning/performance 4.36 3.93