Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;13(10):e18716. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18716

Table 2. Details of diagnosis and surgery.

KPS: Karnofsky performance score.

Case Histopathological diagnosis Site of Lesion Side of Lesion Extent of Resection (Simpson grade) Admission KPS KPS at last follow-up Post-op changes in functional status
1 Meningioma grade II Convexity Right 2 90 90 No change
2 Meningioma grade II Parasagittal Left 2 70 90 Improvement
3 Meningioma grade II Convexity Left 2 90 100 Improvement
4 Meningioma grade I Parasagittal Left 1 80 100 Improvement
5 Meningioma grade I Convexity Right 2 90 100 Improvement
6 Meningioma grade I Convexity Left 1 70 80 Improvement
7 Meningioma grade II Convexity Right 1 90 100 Improvement
8 Meningioma grade II Parasagittal Right 1 50 50 No change
9 Meningioma grade I Convexity Right 1 90 100 Improvement
10 Meningioma grade I Sphenoid wing Left 2 80 100 Improvement
11 Meningioma grade I Convexity Right 3 90 90 No change
12 Meningioma grade II Parasagittal Left 2 60 70 Improvement
13 Meningioma grade I Falcine Right 2 80 80 No change
14 Meningioma grade I Convexity Left 2 90 90 No change
15 Meningioma grade I Convexity Left 2 80 80 No change
16 Meningioma grade I Convexity Left 2 80 80 No change
17 Meningioma grade I Convexity Right 1 90 90 No change