Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5020. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215020

Table 5.

Adherence of the entire population to the expected EBPA option.

Risser 0 1 2
Cobb Degrees Intensity of Treatment
10–20° 0 10% 6% 6%
1 78% 80% 82%
2 5% 4% 1%
3 5% 10% 10%
4 1% 0% 0%
5 1% 1% 2%
6 0% 0% 0%
21–30° 0 1% 1% 1%
1 16% 18% 24%
2 14% 9% 6%
3 39% 45% 47%
4 13% 7% 6%
5 8% 11% 10%
6 9% 8% 7%
31–40° 0 0% 0% 0%
1 1% 0% 1%
2 0% 1% 1%
3 9% 7% 4%
4 16% 15% 9%
5 4% 17% 18%
6 70% 59% 67%
Severe (41–45°) 0 0% 0% 0%
1 0% 0% 0%
2 0% 0% 0%
3 0% 0% 0%
4 2% 0% 0%
5 0% 0% 7%
6 98% 100% 93%

The treatment applied is listed for each clinical condition (defined according to the degree of scoliosis and Risser test—see Appendix A). The intensity of applied treatment follows this ordinal scale: 0. Observation, 1. PSSE (SEAS School), 2. Elastic brace (SpineCor), 3. Rigid brace 18/21 h/d, 4. Rigid brace 22/24 h/d, 5. Very rigid brace (Sforzesco) 18–21 h/d, 6. Very rigid brace (Sforzesco) 22–24 h/d. The yellow cells correspond to the expected EBPA. There are patients with treatment above or below the expected EBPA range. The choices performed for each subgroup are reported in Table 4 to compare with the benchmarked studies.