Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;10(21):4866. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214866

Table 4.

Comparison of the groups of subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Subject Group
Normal Hearing (n) Hearing Loss (n) p-Value a,b
n (%) PTA(dB) SD n (%) PTA(dB) SD
Non-MetS 38,069 (92.0%) 11.11 4.96 3293 (7.9%) 38.70 15.44 <0.0001 *
Non-MetS
(1 factor)
22,635 (87.9%) 12.25 5.22 3109 (12.1%) 38.72 14.75 <0.0001 *
Non-MetS
(2 factors)
13,272 (86.2%) 12.84 5.23 2123(13.8%) 38.16 13.83 <0.0001 *
MetS (3 factors) 6900 (86.2%) 13.19 5.20 1098 (13.8%) 37.79 13.56 <0.0001 *
MetS (4 factors) 2396 (84.5%) 13.34 5.12 438 (15.5%) 37.56 13.56 <0.0001 *
MetS (5 factors) 449 (83.7%) 13.65 5.28 87 (16.3%) 38.86 12.95 <0.0001 *

Results are reported as mean ± SD or as n (%). Abbreviations: MetS, metabolic syndrome; Non-MetS, without metabolic syndrome; PTA, pure tone audiometry. * p values between Normal hearing and Hearing loss were tested using the t-test a and chi-square b. * Statistically significant. p < 0.05.