Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0258941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258941

Table 2. Overview of studies included.

Author Article type Sample Frequency of professional pre-qualifications (PPQ) Main outcome
(year, country) Characteristics
Research Question a) objective (cognitive) data
1 Hampe et al., 2008; Germany Peer-reviewed N = 333 medical students; N = 63 (18.9%1) have PPQ Completed professional pre-qualifications was not correlated with improved academic success.
N = 51 medical students with medical-associated PPQ were not specified in the analysis
nfemale = 216 (64.9%1)
Students with professional pre-qualifications passed significantly fewer exams on average (n = 5.8, SD = 6.2) than students without prior vocational qualifications (n = 8.8, SD = 8.7) (t-test: p < .01).
nmale = 117 (35.1%1)
Mage not reported
2 Heidmann et al., 2017; Germany Congress paper N = 277 participants who took part in the university selection process at the European Medical School Oldenburg Number of students with PPQ not reported Students with medicine-associated professional pre-qualifications performed significantly better on the overall MMI score (p < .05, r = .14) and on the selection interviews (p < .01, r = .17).
3 Hampe et al., 2009; Germany Review Overall number of medical students not reported Number of students with PPQ not reported Previous professional pre-qualifications demonstrate no significant difference regarding dropout rates (except for a later start of study at 28–32 years of age).
The grades for students with professional pre-qualifications were on average slightly worse in the pre-clinical, but not in the clinical, study section than those of the other students
4 Simmenroth-Nayda et al., 2014; Germany Peer-reviewed N = 3473 participants who took part in the university selection process; N = 533 (15%1) have relevant/health-care associated PPQ Students with professional pre-qualifications scored significantly better in the selection process of the universities of Göttingen (M = 22.24 points (3.54)/ M = 22.25 points (1.95)) than participants without PPQ M = 19.44 points (3.24)/ M = 20.95 points (2.85)); (δ = 0.744, p < .014/ δ = 0.554, p < .015).
nfemale = 2473 (71%1)
nmale = 1003 (29%1)
Mage = 20.0 years1,2 (R = 17–34 years)
The advantage vanishes in the second step of the selection process with A-level grades.
Participants with professional pre-qualifications tended to score lower in the A-level grades (M = 23.44 points (1.84))/ M = 24.05 points (0.95)) than other participants (M = 27.74 points (1.74))/ M = 26.95 points (1.15) (δ = 2.454, p < .0014/ δ = 2.925, p < 0.0015).
Research Question b) non-cognitive data
5 Hiemisch at al., 2005; Germany Peer-reviewed N = 853 students of medicine and dental medicine at both times; Number of students with PPQ not reported Since only 5–6% of the variance could be attributed to the variables age, gender and completed professional pre-qualifications, these variables were not included in the analysis.
%female = (65%1)
%male = (35%1)
6 Talwalker et al., 2016; USA Peer-reviewed N = 166 students of medical, nursing and physician associate studies; N = 143 (86.7%) have healthcare-associated PPQ On the Roles/Responsibility subscale of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale, students with healthcare-associated professional pre-qualifications scored significantly higher (M = 11.9 points (2.33)) than those participants who had no prior experience (M = 10.7 points (2.19)) (t-test: t(163) = 2.30, p < .05).
nfemale = 112 (67.9%)
nmale = 53 (32.1%)
Mage = 25.1 years1 (2.91)
7 Paulmann et al., 2016; Switzerland Congress paper N = 628 medical graduates 1.5 years after finishing university in 5 cohorts N = 142 (23%) have PPQ, more than 80% of them healthcare-associated (ca. 19%) Previous professional qualifications do not influence the dependent variables ("self-assessed medical skills" and "assessment of study satisfaction").
However, a negative influence due to the delayed start of medical studies could not be shown either.
Research Question c) preference for subsequent specialist training
7 Paulmann et al., 2016; Switzerland Congress paper N = 628 medical graduates 1.5 years after finishing university in 5 cohorts N = 142 (23%) have PPQ, more than 80% of them healthcare-associated (ca. 19%) Among students with professional pre-qualifications, the field of anaesthesiology appears to be significantly more popular (27%) than among students without professional pre-qualifications (9%)
8 Kesternich et al., 2017; Germany Peer-reviewed N = 474 medical students during their clinical period at medical studies Number of students with PPQ not reported Students who wanted to become rural physicians tend to have more healthcare-associated professional pre-qualifications, but the difference was not significant (two-sided t-test: p > .05).
Rractical experience in the health-care sector 53%
nfemale = 2991 (63%)
nmale = 1751(37%)
9 Kopp et al., 2016; Germany Peer-reviewed N = 11,462 medical students; Number of students with PPQ not reported Healthcare-associated professional pre-qualifications had a modest, nonsignificant, positive influence on the preference toward general practice as residency.
nfemale = 6,634 (64%),
nmale = 3,650 (36%);
Mage = 25 years2
10 Rourke et al., 2008; Canada Review Overall number of medical students not reported Number of students with PPQ not reported Students from rural areas are more likely to enter the profession of rural medicine.
Practical medical work, undergraduate rural training, or postgraduate rural training have a positive influence on entering the profession of rural medicine.
11 Henry et al., 2009; Australia Review Overall number of medical students not reported Number of students with PPQ not reported. A strong predictor of admissions to rural medical practice is if students resided in a rural area prior to medical school.
Practical work, especially in the later clinical sections of medical school, also has a positive influence on starting work as a rural physician.

1 value self-calculated by author

2 standard deviation not reported

3summation of values from two different cohorts, self-calculated by author.

4 cohort of students in winter semester 2013/14 at the University of Göttingen

5cohort of students in summer semester 2014 at the University of Göttingen.