Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5074. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215074

Table 4.

Statistically significant differences in relative abundance of bacterial phyla, classes, and orders in studied populations.

Taxonomic Unit Relative Abundance in CAD Group Relative Abundance
in Control Group
p-Value
(Adjusted for Sex and Age)
Phyla
Proteobacteria 7.4695 (5.1935–9.7455) 4.6714 (3.4979–5.8449) 0.032
Bacteroidetes 33.5334 (30.8517–36.2151) 37.1957 (35.1636–39.2278) 0.032
Classes
Bacteroidetes, Bacteroidia 33.5334 (30.8517–36.2151) 37.1957 (35.1636–39.2278) 0.032
Firmicutes, Bacilli 4.1117 (2.9382–5.2852) 1.2206 (0.7898–1.6514) <0.001
Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria 6.0816 (3.8101–8.3531) 3.4073 (2.2397–4.5749) 0.04
Order
Actinobacteria, Actinobacteria, Actinomycetales 0.0281 (0.0164–0.0398) 0.0135 (0.0095–0.0175) 0.021
Actinobacteria, Actinobacteria, Micrococcales 0.0152 (0.0108–0.0196) 0.0083 (0.0043–0.0123) 0.021
Bacteroidetes, Bacteroidia, Bacteroidales 33.4714 (30.7887–36.1541) 37.1229 (35.0883–39.1575) 0.033
Firmicutes, Bacilli, Lactobacillales 3.891 (2.7367–5.0453) 1.1638 (0.745–1.5826) <0.001
Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriales 5.4589 (3.1754–7.7424) 2.5555 (1.4063–3.7047) 0.026

CAD—coronary artery disease group, CI—confidence interval. Mean values together with the 95% confidence intervals of the means are presented.