Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 8;2:235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2021.08.003

Table II.

There were statistically significant differences in the mean elastic modulus, toughness, and relative strain among the different aortic segments of the normal aorta compared with the root as a reference (Ref)

Elastic modulus, kPa
Toughness, J/m3
Relative strain
Est. 95% confidence interval P value Est. 95% confidence interval P value Est. 95% confidence interval P value
Circumferential
 Root Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Ascending −303.0 −430.4 to −175.5 <.001 −88.7 −282.4 to 104.9 .4 0.012 −0.004 to 0.028 .2
 Arch −445.1 −576.9 to −313.3 <.001 −129.9 −339.7 to 79.8 .2 0.023 0.006 to 0.040 .008
 Descending −313.6 −440.1 to −187.0 <.001 77.0 −122.3 to 276.3 .5 0.020 0.004 to 0.036 .01
Longitudinal
 Root Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Ascending −34.5 −139.7 to 70.8 .5 205.7 59.9 to 351.5 .007 −0.021 −0.041 to −0.001 .04
 Arch −110.6 −215.4 to −5.8 .04 120.7 −33.5 to 275.0 .1 −0.015 −0.035 to 0.005 .1
 Descending −42.4 −147.4 to 62.5 .4 −0.1 −154.6 to 154.5 .1 −0.026 −0.046 to −0.006 .01

For circumferential toughness, statistically significant differences arose when comparing aortic segments with the descending thoracic aorta as the reference, that is, differences were significant when comparing the descending with the ascending and arch.

Boldface P values represent statistical significance.