Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Placenta. 2021 Oct 1;115:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.09.021

Table 1.

Morphological comparisons of WT vs. Slc6a4 (SERT) KO placenta.

WT Placenta Slc6a4 (SERT) KO Placenta P value

Variable Mean (Pixels) SEM Mean (Pixels) SEM Significance

LA 3386269.25 764900.34 3452322.00 199735.67 N.S.
SpongioTB 3928196.75 679603.32 3116243.67 249725.72 N.S.
pTGC 453818.25 48274.79 1639780.00 237970.99 0.002
LA:pTGC ratio 7.5950000 1.8281328 2.2175667 0.3870017 0.06
pTGC:SpongioTB ratio 0.1244750 0.0215799 0.5323000 0.0871145 0.003
LA:SpongioTB ratio 0.8520250 0.0896600 1.1177667 0.0895804 N.S.

N.S.- not significant