Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):531–536. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1980

Table 2.

Gender distribution of numeral and size developmental dental anomaly

Males (n = 2,000), N% Females (n = 2,000), N% Total (n = 4,000), N% p value
Number anomaly
  Hypodontia 99 (4.9%) 89 (4.4%) 188 (4.7%) 0.45 (NS)
  Hyperdontia 24 (1.2%) 21 (1.05%) 45 (1.125%) 0.65 (NS)
  Supernumerary root 11 (0.5%) 7 (0.3%) 18 (0.4%) 0.34 (NS)
  Total numeral anomalies 134 (6.7%) 117 (5.8%) 251 (6.27%) 0.26 (NS)
Size anomaly
  Microdontia 33 (1.6%) 38 (1.9%) 71 (1.8%) 0.54 (NS)
  Macrodontia 0 1 (0.05%) 1 (0.02%)
  Short root 6 (0.3%) 2 (0.1%) 8 (0.2%) 0.15 (NS)
  Total size anomalies 39 (1.9%) 41 (2.05%) 80 (2%) 0.82 (NS)

Chi-square test