Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):531–536. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1980

Table 3.

Age distribution of numeral and size developmental dental anomaly

10–25 years (n = 2,000), N% 25–40 years (n = 2,000), N% Total (n = 4,000), N% p value
Number anomaly
  Hypodontia 124 (6.2%) 64 (3.2%) 188 (4.7%) 0.00001 (significant)
  Hyperdontia 27 (1.35%) 18 (0.9%) 45 (1.125%) 0.17 (NS)
  Supernumerary root 12 (0.6%) 6 (0.3%) 18 (0.4%) 0.15 (NS)
  Total numeral anomalies 163 (8.15%) 88 (4.4%) 251 (6.25%) 0.00001 (significant)
Size anomaly
  Microdontia 32 (1.6%) 39 (1.9%) 71 (1.8%) 0.4 (NS)
  Macrodontia 0 1 (0.05%) 1 (0.02%)
  Short root 6 (0.3%) 2 (0.1%) 8 (0.2%) 0.15 (NS)
  Total size anomalies 38 (1.9%) 42 (2.1%) 80 (2%) 0.65 (NS)