Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2021 May 12;38(2):373–381. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12583

TABLE 3.

Isolation scores and sociodemograhics as a function of latent class membership

n (%) or M (SD) P value
Full sample
(N = 566)
Nonusers
(n = 386)
Cigarette/ECIG
experimenters (n = 70)
Current ECIG users (n =
65)
Polytobacco users
(n = 45)
Isolation score 6.1 (1.1) 5.7 (0.9) 6.4 (1.2) 5.9 (1.1) 6.4 (1.4) <.001
% Female sex 343 (60.6) 246 (63.6) 43 (61.1) 34 (52.3) 20 (43.5) .035
Age 16.2 (1.2) 15.7 (1.2) 16.5 (1.2) 16.0 (1.2) 16.6 (1.2) <.001
% Parents with ≥ .118
college degree
0 165 (29.2) 88 (22.7) 39 (54.2) 25 (38.5) 15 (32.6)
1 127 (22.4) 77 (20.0) 20 (27.8) 17 (26.2) 13 (28.3)
2 241 (42.6) 201 (52.0) 10 (13.9) 18 (27.7) 12 (26.1)

Note. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; P values are from one-way ANOVA (df = 563) for continuous variables and chi-square tests (df = 2) for categorical variables.