Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 23;9:105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.020

Table 1.

Merits and limitations of microgel assembly strategies.

Driving forces for microgel assembly Merits Limitations Ref.
1.Chemical reaction Chemically and mechanically stable microgel assembly;
Irreversible assembling process in most cases;
Complicated functional group modification on monomer or microgel surface;
Possible damage to cells;
  • (a)

    Enzymatic catalysis

Mild reaction conditions (neutral pH, moderate temperature);
Cytocompatible;
Fragile enzyme activity;
Possible unexpected side reactions induced by enzyme in the microgel system;
19, 21, 28, 29
  • (b)

    Photo-initiated radical polymerization

Mild reaction conditions (normally at room temperature);
Short reaction time;
High spatiotemporal resolution;
Possible damage to cells by released active free radicals;
Incomplete crosslinking inside microgel assembly especially for microgels with deep color;
21, 30-36
  • (c)

    Click chemistry

Mild reaction conditions;
Fast and efficient;
Complicated synthesis steps for functional group modification; 37–42
  • (d)

    Non-enzymatic amidation reaction

No additional modification to microgels containing peptides and proteins;
Mature reaction condition and crosslinker;
Possible damage to cells by reacting membrane proteins with crosslinker or other proteins in microgels; 43
2.Physical reaction Reversible and spontaneous;
Special properties of microgel assembly (except biotin and streptavidin conjugation) like dynamical bonding, self-healing, shear-thinning and injectability;
Relatively weaker mechanical strength of microgel assembly compared with chemical reaction;
  • (a)

    Host-guest interaction

Biocompatible;
Fast and spontaneous;
No toxic crosslinker;
Complicated functional group modification;
Weak and unstable binding force especially in aqueous solution;
47–49
  • (b)

    Electrostatic interaction

Easy-going assembly process;
Fast and spontaneous;
No toxic crosslinker;
Easily destroyed electrostatic interaction among microgels especially in electrolyte solution; 9, 50-53
  • (c)

    Hydrogen bonding (including DNA base complementation, polypeptide self- assembly)

Biocompatible;
Tunable bonding intensity;
No toxic crosslinker;
Special treatment (freezing-thawing cycle) or complicated high-cost fabrication of DNA strands and polypeptides to enhance hydrogen bonding; 24, 55-57
  • (d)

    Biotin and streptavidin conjugation

Biocompatible, fast and spontaneous;
No toxic crosslinker;
Irreversible interaction; 40
3.Cell-cell interaction No additional chemicals or external stimuli (e.g. UV);
No cytotoxicity;
Relatively slow assembly process with the rate depending on cell seeding density and cell adhesion/migration/proliferation rates; cells may possibly occupy pores on microgel surface and thereby reduce diffusion efficiency. 10, 60-62
4.External driving force Simple, fast and cost-effective;
No special requirements for microgel materials;
Unstable microgel assembly;
A subsequent second crosslinking is necessary;
  • (a)

    Fluidic force

Precise 1D or 2D structures of microgel assembly; Complex fabrication of individual microgel;
Difficult in achieving 3D constructs composed of multilayer microgels;
63–66
  • (b)

    Surface tension

No complicated design for microgel materials;
Easy to operate;
Biocompatible;
Secondary cross-linking is required to stabilize the assembly;
Difficult in achieving 3D constructs composed of multilayer microgels;
67, 68
  • (c)

    Magnetic and acoustic force

Fast and efficient;
Suitable for various microgel materials;
Potential cytotoxicity of magnetic nanoparticles;
Fast decay in magnetic and acoustic energy along microgel thickness, limiting the final size assembled 3D constructs;
69–72