TABLE 4.

The estimates of Model 5.

Random effects	Variance	SD	r
Participant (Intercept)	0.06	0.25
Type	0.08	0.29	–0.16
Condition	0.01	0.09	0.45	0.37
Description (Intercept)	0.15	0.39
Actor (Intercept)	0.00	0.00
Fixed effects	Estimate	SE	Z	P
(Intercept)	0.299	0.074	4.03	< 0.001*
Type	0.561	0.145	3.88	< 0.001*
Condition	–0.035	0.072	–0.49	0.624
Group (Blind)	0.097	0.040	2.41	0.016*
Group (O&M)	–0.060	0.042	–1.42	0.156
Group (Sighted)	–0.038	0.032	–1.18	0.238
Type × Condition	–0.124	0.143	–0.87	0.384
Type × Group (Blind)	0.030	0.065	0.45	0.651
Type × Group (O&M)	–0.023	0.068	–0.34	0.735
Type × Group (Sighted)	–0.007	0.052	–0.13	0.897
Condition × Group (Blind)	–0.044	0.030	–1.45	0.146
Condition × Group (O&M)	0.025	0.031	–0.82	0.412
Condition × Group (Sighted)	0.018	0.024	0.77	0.442
Type × Condition × Group (Blind)	–0.222	0.056	–3.95	< 0.001*
Type × Condition × Group (O&M)	–0.016	0.058	–0.27	0.788
Type × Condition × Group (Sighted)	0.238	0.044	5.35	< 0.001*

The summary report used maximum likelihood estimation (Laplace approximation) with a binomial probit link function. The coding system used compares the mean of the dependent variable for a given level to the overall mean of the dependent variable. *p < 0.05.