Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;12:756116. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.756116

TABLE 3.

Glyphosate resistance analysis of the T0 transgenic lines.

Binary vector Glyphosate dosage (g a.e./m2) Total number of transgenic lines Number of HR lines HR ratio (%) Number of MR lines MR ratio (%) Number of LR lines LR ratio (%) Number of NR lines NR ratio (%)
ZH11 0.1125 (1×) 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 100.00

pCEiEPSPS 0.1125 (1×) 69 63 91.30 4 5.80 2 2.90 0 0.00
0.225 (2×) 10 6 60.00 2 20.00 1 10.00 1 10.00
0.5625 (5×) 9 8 88.89 0 0.00 1 11.11 0 0.00
1.125 (10×) 10 7 70.00 2 20.00 1 10.00 0 0.00

pCP4-EPSPS 0.1125 (1×) 35 31 88.57 2 5.71 2 5.71 0 0.00
0.225 (2×) 15 5 33.33 8 53.33 2 13.33 0 0.00
0.5625 (5×) 13 1 7.69 0 0.00 11 84.62 1 7.69
1.125 (10×) 13 2 15.38 3 23.08 4 30.77 4 30.77

HR, High Resistant, plants with no injury at all after being sprayed by glyphosate; MR, Moderate Resistant, plants with some injury spots after being sprayed by glyphosate but would recover growth in a week; LR, Low Resistant, plants with severe injury but still alive; NR, None Resistant.