Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov;289:114450. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114450

Table 1.

Top Ten Influential authors.

Author Country affiliation Link author Betweenness centralitya Closeness centralitya Degree centralitya No. of systematic reviews authored Alcohol industry funding history
j. rehm (subnetwork 1) Canada, Germany, Switzerland No 60.8 1 18 12 None known
e. b. rimm (subnetwork 3) USA, Canada Yes 51 0.777778 10 3 International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI Europe Alcohol Task Force)
v. bagnardi (subnetwork 2) Italy Yes 46.5 0.928571 12 3 None known
k. j. mukamal (subnetwork 3) USA Yes 40 0.7 8 3 Anheuser-Busch InBev, Carlsberg Breweries A/S, Diageo plc, Heineken, Pernod Ricard USA LLC
m. roerecke (subnetwork 1) Canada No 27.3 0.857143 15 10 None known
a. britton (subnetwork 5) England Yes 27 1 10 3 None known
he jiang (subnetwork 8) USA Yes 25 1 10 2 None known
e. s. shin (subnetwork 7) Korea No 12 1 11 2 None known
j. g. jung (subnetwork 7) Korea No 12 1 11 2 None known
o. s. m. hasan (subnetwork 1) Canada No 8.8 0.72 11 3 None known
a

Betweenness centrality measures the number of times an author acts as a bridge along the shortest path between two other authors, closeness centrality is based on the ‘closeness’ of authors to other authors, and degree centrality is based on the number of connections held by each author. The table is ranked according to betweenness centrality as this has the added advantage that a fully connected graph is not required whereas closeness centrality is measured within the relevant subnetwork.