Table 3.
Systematic reviews conclusions and alcohol industry funding.
| Subnetwork and number of SRs | Concludes alcohol had cardio protective effect | Concludes alcohol does not have any cardio protective effect |
|---|---|---|
| Known histories of alcohol Industry funding (all authors) | ||
| Subnetwork 2 (n = 6) | 6 | 0 |
| Subnetwork 3 (n = 5) | 5 | 0 |
| Subnetworks 14, 22 & 26 (n = 3) (one review/network) |
3 | 0 |
| Total |
14 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
| No known Alcohol Industry funding histories | ||
| Subnetwork 1 (n = 12) | 4 | 8 |
| Subnetwork 4 (n = 4) | 3 | 1 |
| Subnetwork 5 (n = 3) | 0 | 2 |
| Subnetwork 6 (n = 2) | 1 | 1 |
| Subnetwork 7 (n = 2) | 1 | 1 |
| Subnetwork 8 (n = 2) | 2 | 0 |
| Subnetwork 9 (n = 2) | 1 | 1 |
| Subnetworks 10–13, 15–21, 23–25, 27–31 (n = 19) (one review/network) |
13 | 5 |
| Total | 25 (54%) | 19 (41%) |
NB: Two reviews with no known histories of alcohol industry funding were inconclusive (one from subnetwork 5, the other an isolate review).