Table 4.
SEM regression estimates.
| Hypotheses |
Research model |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (β) | C-R (T-value) | SMC | Hypo. results | ||
| H1 | Planned resilience → Adaptive resilience | .49*** | 13.960 | ---- | Supported |
| H2 | Planned resilience → Performance | .21** | 3.978 | ---- | Supported |
| H3 | Adaptive resilience → Performance | .35*** | 8.506 | ---- | Supported |
| H4 | Planned resilience → Adaptive resilience → Performance | Path 1: β = .49*** and Path 2: β = .35 *** | Path 1: T-value = 13.960 and Path 2: T-value = 8.506 | ---- | Supported |
| H5 | Planned resilience → Sustainable Tourism Development | .18** | 2.986 | ---- | Supported |
| H6 | Adaptive resilience → Sustainable Tourism Development | .31*** | 6.978 | ---- | Supported |
| H7 | Performance → Sustainable Tourism Development | .57*** | 16.203 | ---- | Supported |
| H8 | Planned resilience → Performance → Sustainable Tourism Development | Path 1: β = .21** and Path 2: β = .57 *** | Path 1: T-value = 3.978 and Path 2: T-value = 16.203 | ---- | Supported |
| H9 | Adaptive resilience → Performance → Sustainable Tourism Development | Path 1: β = .35*** and Path 2: β = .57 *** | Path 1: T-value = 8.506 and Path 2: T-value = 16.203 | ---- | Supported |
| H10 | Planned resilience → Adaptive resilience → Sustainable Tourism Development | Path 1: β = .49*** and Path 2:β = .31 *** | Path 1: T-value = 13.960 and Path 2: T-value = 6.978 | Supported | |
| Adaptive resilience | ------------ | ------------ | .24 | ------------ | |
| Performance | ------------ | ------------ | .17 | ------------ | |
| Sustainable Tourism Development | ------------ | ------------ | .46 | ------------ | |
Model fit:. (χ2 (164, N = 630) = 656.164, p < 0.001, normed χ2 = 4.001, RMSEA = 0.034, SRMR = .046, CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.948, NFI = 0.942, PCFI = 0.804 and PNFI = 0.707). Note: *** significant level less than 0.001; ** significant level less than 0.01.