Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 25;94:102824. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102824

Table 5.

SEM Multi-group analysis – type of enterprise (Restaurants- Hotels).

Hypotheses Model 1: Restaurants Path Coefficient (β,P, T- value) Model 1: Hotels Path Coefficient (β, P, T- value) Restaurant- Hotels significance difference "P value"
Planned resilience → Adaptive resilience β = .32, p***, T-value=6.648 β = .22, p **, T-value=5.367 p = .412
Planned resilience → Performance β = .25, p *, T-value=3.967 β = .11, p ns, T-value= 1.532 p =.041
Adaptive resilience → Performance β = .31, p ***, T-value=4.949 β = .21, p **, T-value=3.241 p =.037
Planned resilience → STD β = .17, p *, T-value=1.999 β = .09, p ns, T-value=1.009 p=.038
Adaptive resilience → STD β = .33, p ***, T-value=6.787 β = .12, p ns, T-value=1.496 p=.029
Performance → STD β = .41, p ***, T-value=9.783 β = .31, p***, T-value=6.425 p=.601

Note: *** significant level less than 0.001; ** significant level less than 0.01; * significant level less than 0.05; p ns: not significant.