Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;26(21):6739. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216739

Table 5.

The significantly different metabolites between the different drying methods.

No. RT/min Name Match VIP P/T-Test log2FC_HA/HR
1 18.354 Hexadecanoic acid 926 1.1281 0.0470 −0.2581
2 16.420 D-Galactose 925 1.7667 0.0000 −0.1467
3 16.127 Fructose 922 1.4236 0.0058 −0.1508
4 16.441 Glucose 920 1.4569 0.0041 −0.6999
5 8.803 Phosphoric acid 901 1.2672 0.0204 −0.1303
6 11.669 Malic acid 901 1.3235 0.0136 −0.1000
7 18.862 Myo-Inositol 900 1.5149 0.0021 0.0850
8 8.798 Glycerol 896 1.1849 0.0343 −0.2474
9 17.154 Gallic acid 895 1.7217 0.0000 0.2589
10 21.070 Octadecanoic acid 895 1.2083 0.0298 −0.2691
11 7.938 L-Valine 871 1.6172 0.0005 −1.0702
12 5.579 2,6,10-Trimethyldodecane 863 1.3412 0.0119 0.6830
13 19.361 Octadecane, 2-methyl- 855 1.2689 0.0202 −0.1432
14 14.244 Nonadecane 835 1.1689 0.0376 −0.1294
15 22.321 2,10-Dimethylundecane 774 1.4382 0.0050 −0.7777
16 28.313 D-Ribose 754 1.2642 0.0209 0.0555
17 27.430 DL-Arabinose 700 1.2362 0.0251 0.0764

Note: FC is fold changes described with the log2 transformed numbers. Positive values of FC indicate upregulation, and negative values indicate downregulation.