Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 5;21(21):7355. doi: 10.3390/s21217355

Table 2.

Comparison of the reported methods for Fe3+ and Cr2O72− using Ln-MOFs.

Ln-MOFs Detect Ion LOD (M) Ratio Fluorescent Probe Linear Range References
Eu0.075Tb0.925-MOF Fe3+ 2.71 × 10−7 Dual emission 10–100 μM
(R2 = 0.99919, R2 = 0.99937)
This work
Cr2O72− 8.72 × 10−7
Eu-MOF; Tb-MOF
[Eu/Tb, 4,4′-(((5-
carboxy-1,3-phenylene)bis(azanediyl))bis(carbonyl)) dibenzoic acid]
Fe3+ 1 × 10−5 Single emission 0–1.0 mM
(R2 = 0.9021, R2 = 0.9752)
[47]
Cr2O72− 8.94 × 10−5
Eu-MOF
[Eu, 5-(2′,5′-dicarboxylphenyl) picolinic acid ligand]
Fe3+ 5.7 × 10−7 Single emission 0–50 μM
(R2 = 0.9948, R2 = 0.9979)
[48]
Cr2O72− 4.2 × 10−7
Tb-MOF [Tb,H3BTB] Fe3+ 1 × 10−5 Single emission - [49]
Eu-MOF [Eu, 2-aminoterephthalic acid 1,10-phenanthroline] Fe3+ 4.5 × 10−5 Single emission 0–0.25 mM
(R2 = 0.992)
[50]
Tb-MOF [Tb, 2-(2-carboxyphenoxy)terephthalic acid] Fe3+ 2.0 × 10−4 Single emission 10−4–10−3 M
(R2 = 0.978)
[51]
Eu-MOF [Eu, 2-(3′,4′-dicarboxylphenoxy)isophthalic acid, 4,4′-bis(imidazolyl) biphenyl Fe3+ 1.32 × 10−5 Single emission 0–10−5 M
(R2 = 0.9885, R2 = 0.9927)
[52]
Cr2O72− 1.01 × 10−5