Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J. 2016 Jun 3;824(1):16. doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/824/1/16

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

1D marginalized posterior distributions, showing 1- and 2-sigma credible intervals, for the propagation parameters that were varied in the propagation scan. Light blue: the constraints from p, p¯, and He scan, using PAMELA and CREAM data only; Purple: light element scan, fitting Be, B, C, N, and O data. (Given in Table 3.) While most of the propagation parameters overlap between runs, there is a clear (>2σ) separation seen in the Alfvén speed and in the low-energy injection break rigidity ρbr. Differences in the D0zh plane can be clearly seen in Figure 3. The injection index for p, p¯, and He is also consistently lower below the 220 GV break, suggesting a harder source injection spectrum.