Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec;37(12):4051–4058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.12.4051-4058.1999

TABLE 4.

Correlation of mecA PCR test results with MIC category results for current and proposed oxacillin breakpoints

Organism group (no. of tests) % Correct values with the indicated medium by MIC breakpointa
Proposed (≤0.25 = S; ≥0.5 = R)
Current (≤2.0 = S; ≥4.0 = R)
CDC Difco MScan Difco CDC Acumedia MScan BDMS CDC Difco MScan Difco CDC Acumedia MScan BDMS
mecA positive
S. epidermidis (198) 95.5 96.0 94.4 93.4 52.5 8.1 72.3 40.9
 Other species (120) 90.8 90.8 66.7 93.3 65.0 55.0 40.8 51.7
 All strains 93.7 94.0 84.0 93.4 57.2 25.8 62.3 45.0
mecA negative
S. epidermidis (99) 100 (97)b 100 (98) 99.0 (97) 100 (99) 100 (97) 100 (98) 100 (97) 100 (99)
 Other species (132) 52.7 (129) 55.0 (131) 60.9 (126) 66.4 (131) 97.7 (129) 100 (131) 96.9 (126) 100 (131)
 All strains 73.1 74.3 77.4 80.9 98.7 100 98.2 100
a

For mecA-positive strains, MICs must be ≥0.5 μg/ml for proposed breakpoints or ≥4.0 μg/ml for current breakpoints to be considered correct; for mecA-negative strains, MICs must be ≤0.25 μg/ml for proposed breakpoints or ≤2.0 μg/ml for current breakpoints to be considered correct. MScan, MicroScan; S, susceptible; R, resistant. 

b

Number given in parentheses is the total number of results used for calculations. Differences were due to growth failures in some MIC plates.