Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;21(21):7038. doi: 10.3390/s21217038

Table 1.

Comparison of related works with their reported results.

Ref. Feature Extraction Method Dataset Result
[7] Face skin (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, energy, entropy) K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) 120 random images from Google infant monitoring Accuracy = 90–96%
[8] Forehead skin (RGB) Linear regression model 64 images at Aalborg University Hospital in Denmark Green sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 62%
Blue sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 60%
[9] Sternum and forehead skin (YCbCr and lab color spaces) Ensemble of five regression algorithms (KNN, Least angle regression (LARS), LARS-Lasso Elastic Net, Support vector regression (SVR), Random forest (RF)) 100 images collected from University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and the Roosevelt Pediatric Care Center A linear correlation of 0.84 with TSB, with a mean error of 2.0 mg/dL
[10] Forehead and sternum skin (Lab color spaces) Matching Standard set of serum bilirubin coloration on detection strips Correlation = 0.93
[11] Forehead skin (RGB and Hue, Saturation, Intensity (HIS) values) Regression 113 images at Hafez and Shoushtari hospitals in Shiraz, Iran using a Samsung phone Sensitivity = 68% Specificity = 92.3%
[12] Sternum skin (YCbCr and lab color spaces) Regression 530 images of different races in US including African American, Hispanic, and Asian American Sensitivity = 84.6%
Specificity = 75.1%
[13] Sternum and abdomen skin (Hue and Saturation values) Regression 35 images in Chennai, India Sternum correlation = 0.6
Abdomen correlation = 0.55
[14] Abdomen skin (YCbCr, RGB, and lab color spaces) KNN
SVR
80 image from Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Neonatal Department in Turkey KNN accuracy = 85%
SVR accuracy = 75%
[15] Soles, palm, forehead, and arm skin (RGB + diffuse reflectance spectra) SVM 20 images of Mexican infants Sensitivity = 71.8% Specificity = 78.8%
[16] Face, arms, feet and middle body skin (RGB) Linear regression 196 images at Firat university, Faculty of Medicine using an Android mobile phone or tablet Accuracy = 92.5%
[17] Eye (RGB) Linear regression 110 images at University College London Hospital captured using a Nikon D3200 camera Correlation = 0.75
[18] Eye (sclera blue pixels) Random forest regression 70 images of adults eyes at University of Washington using an iPhone SE Sensitivity = 89.7% Specificity = 96.8%
[19] Eye (RGB) Regression 86 images at the UCH Neonatal Unit in London using a Nikon Dh3200 camera Correlation = 0.71
[20] Eye Diazo method with dichloroaniline (DCA) 100 images at King Khalid Hospital at Al-Majma’ah, Saudi Arabia and Alpine Hospital, Gurgaon, India using a Samsung 10 Sensitivity = 92.0% specificity = 75.6%
[21] Eye (PCA to extract L, a, and b values per CIE lab color) Artificial neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) 420 images of adults’ eyes captured in fixed conditions using a 3CDD digital camera in aphotic housing made up of acrylic sheet Accuracy = 90%
[22] Eye (RGB) Jaundice Eye Color Index Scleral-Conjunctival Bilirubin ((JECI-SCB) model and SCBxy model 51 images from the UCL Hospital using an LG Nexus 5X smartphone Correlation = 0.75
[38] Bilirubin sample strips (homomorphic filter and blue color intensity) Correlation between actual and predicted bilirubin level 8 images of bilirubin sample strips Correlation coefficient increased from magnitude 0.5261 to magnitude 0.6974 after filtering